Started By
Message

Texas offense Red Zone ranking - the Melt of MtVernon

Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:38 am
Pinch your nose for this one:

Texas Red Zone offense:
#89 in 2023
#111 in 2024

And Steve Sarkisian is a great coach why? Would somebody clear this up for me?

I was never ecstatic about the Sark hire but I have been told for several years he was a godsend. Please explain.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 9:45 am
Posted by Western_tiger
AC is just domesticated wind.
Member since Dec 2024
410 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:41 am to
wait, yall thought sark was a great coach? B tier in the SEC
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
4910 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:43 am to
He needs an OC to replace him in play calling and just work on QB development/be hc. He has completely turned the program around culture wise.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 8:44 am
Posted by Quicksilver
Poker Room
Member since Jan 2013
11685 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:45 am to
Kiffin has also had struggles in the redzone. Why is that?

I'm not sure either have great answers for the passing game in the redzone. So much of their play design is focused on getting isolation on routes to make the QB read easy. It's a lot harder to get isolation on a short field, especially on the goal line.
Posted by TexasWranglers
Member since Sep 2024
552 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:46 am to
Why is he a Great coach?

Hmmm he’s led us to 2 national semis, 1 conference champ, top recruiting rankings (don’t matter unless you produce but still valuable).

Want to go with rankings? His teams have been top 5 -25 depending on the stat ranking you are comparing. If you want to cherry pick a stat he is objectively bad at and then say therefore he is a bad coach I think that’s absolutely moronic but go ahead lol.
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
4910 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Want to go with rankings? His teams have been top 5 -25 depending on the stat ranking you are comparing. If you want to cherry pick a stat he is objectively bad at and then say therefore he is a bad coach I think that’s absolutely moronic but go ahead lol.


Being bad in the red zone means you are not scoring touchdowns and therefore increases the likelihood of not winning against great teams. It is probably one of the most important stats with turnover margin.

If we are a top 10 redzone team in 2023 and 2024, we are probably in the NC back-to-back years.

Literally lost both semifinal games because we couldn't produce in the redzone.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 8:52 am
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
22356 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:52 am to
Just imagine a truly top 4 coach with the Texas NIL at their disposal? JFC... juggernaut.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:52 am to
quote:

He needs an OC


After decades of following football, I have learned that when media and fans micro-manage a coach it NEVER works out.

Sark is doing what he wants to do. You can't rob him of his passion and expect success. He wants his toys. You can't take them away and tell him just make sure the room stays clean, while someone else gets to play with the toys. He doesn't want to be the CEO type HC. If he is forced to do so, that's not an answer either, because it's not him.

I'm afraid that's what comes next for Texas. Sark will be forced to do things a different way, and we'll flounder a couple years with that. Football is so far behind the business world when it comes to executive management - leadership and contributor personalities. Sark is a contributor.
Posted by RebelTheBear
Saban's spare bedroom
Member since Aug 2016
5770 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:52 am to
Some football teams are built to be better between the twenties than inside the red zone. As much as I love Lane and my Rebs, we struggled in the red zone this year because of our lack of impact offensive linemen and running game. Texas struggled here too because of the same problems.

That's why teams like Georgia, whose offense struggled mightily at times this year, is still a good red zone team. Though they had issues moving the ball down the field, they made the most of their red zone attempts. Once they get there, they are big enough up front and strong enough in the backfield to convert short-yardage situations.

This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 8:54 am
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Kiffin has also had struggles in the redzone. Why is that?


Idk Kiffin's background. Was he raised on West-coast offense? That seems to be the issue. The SEC is too tough for that west-coast BS.
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
4910 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Sark is doing what he wants to do. You can't rob him of his passion and expect success. He wants his toys. You can't take them away and tell him just make sure the room stays clean, while someone else gets to play with the toys. He doesn't want to be the CEO type HC. If he is forced to do so, that's not an answer either, because it's not him.


I get that, but the proof is in the pudding. He needs to figure out how to be a top 10-20 team in the redzone to hoist that trophy or even middle of the pack and let the defense shine. He can't call dumb shite like he did Friday. Also, we need a better fricking RT. Hope Cam Williams leaves.

Like I said above, we lost both semifinal games because we couldn't produce in the redzone.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 8:56 am
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:57 am to
Your analysis shits on me and other monetary contributors, and gives all the credit to a man who can't get us in the end zone.

Something has changed parallel to Sark's time at Texas, it's called NIL. We have easily a top 5 roster in the nation. Coaching has to do the rest.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16556 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

I was never ecstatic about the Sark hire but I have been told for several years he was a godsend. Please explain.


Please check the Shorthorn football record from 2010 to 2020. As a fanatical football fan, you want it all yesterday. Neither life nor sport will give you that.

Fortunately for you, Manning and being creatures of hope will soon have you mouthing off about next year.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Literally lost both semifinal games because we couldn't produce in the redzone.


This is why it gets hard to watch Texas play - even when you win 13 games. It's that constant irritation that you know things are going to bog down, and it gets tiresome to observe.

Looks like our money bought a defense, yes? Thank goodness Sark doesn't touch it.
Posted by Whentheleveebreaks
Member since Aug 2020
2098 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:01 am to
Two reasons

His offense works with speed and spreading teams out to get space. Harder to do in the red zone. His O line focuses on pass blocking more and will not get push in obvious running situations.

He also gets to cute in high pressure situations. WTF with that pitch play?
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
43791 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:03 am to
He's a great program manager. You gotta pick two out of great X&O, great recruiting or great program builder. No one has all 3.
Posted by Kool Kaliper
Mansfield, TX
Member since Nov 2018
1834 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:03 am to
I think Sark is an overrated play-caller, his first 15 plays are great, after that he becomes predictable.
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
20326 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:03 am to
I will be somewhat complimentary and not to quick to crucify Sark. He has a great offensive mind. The strength of the sip offense is how they use misdirection and force misalignments on the defense with the shifts. This works beautifully when a defense has to cover more of the field.

Once inside the red zone, the compression of the field becomes a strength to the defense and that misdirection is nullified for the longhorn offense.

Sark, once he shifts to a more "smash mouth" standard offense in the red zone will see more success. He needs more meat and potatoes in the red zone and less fine dining, so to speak.
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
4910 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

His offense works with speed and spreading teams out to get space. Harder to do in the red zone. His O line focuses on pass blocking more and will not get push in obvious running situations.


Ima give the benefit of the doubt about the run game being affected the last two seasons because our starting RB got hurt two years in a row. CJ Baxter gets in the endzone from the 1 yard line Friday.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6847 posts
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Fortunately for you, Manning and being creatures of hope will soon have you mouthing off about next year.


I am positive about Manning - I'm not going to lie. Because he is a Manning - which tells me he is a fierce competitor once his blood gets boiling.

I expect Arch and Sark to clash in the heat of battle. I expect Arch to say "frick that" to Sark's call when the fight is on. I expect Arch to bring the passion and "want to" to the team while Sark stares at his nice colorful play sheet.

So yeah, I expect Arch to make us better.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter