Started By
Message
The real mistake was expanding
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:51 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Says it all. Any given year you have 2-3 teams, occasionally 4, that jump out as legitimately deserving. 12 is asinine. You're scraping the bottom of the barrel and no matter who gets in down there they don't deserve it.
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 2:52 pm
12
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:52 pm to StansberryRules
Expanding to 8 was fine. Expanding to 12 and playing favorites to shitty conferences by giving them a bye fricked the whole thing up.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:53 pm to StansberryRules
Hear here.
It's not about the teams who couldn't get in.
It was letting in more than 4.
It's not about the teams who couldn't get in.
It was letting in more than 4.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:54 pm to StansberryRules
8 is about as many as it needs to be.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:54 pm to StansberryRules
DEI teams gettin' whupped.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:55 pm to StansberryRules
You're right about 4, but the problem is the 4 with the best resume aren't typically the 4 best teams. Last year is a primary example, Georgia might have been the best team, but they had the 6th best resume(4 that made it + FSU). Hell Oregon might have even won it if they'd gotten in
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:56 pm to StansberryRules
Yeah because there were never blowouts before
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:57 pm to StansberryRules
The Top 4 most likely would have been..
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Penn State
4. Texas
* switched 3 and 4 to avoid rematches
That’s likely to be the semifinals this year.. why are people complaining about more football?
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Penn State
4. Texas
* switched 3 and 4 to avoid rematches
That’s likely to be the semifinals this year.. why are people complaining about more football?
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:57 pm to StansberryRules
We’re 2 games in and people (retards) are already blasting out hot takes 
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:59 pm to dawgfan24348
The presence of many blowouts before is an argument against expansion, not for it. Not sure why retards who keep bringing them up fail to grasp that.
They struggled to find 4 great teams most years. What about that says go to 12?
They struggled to find 4 great teams most years. What about that says go to 12?
Posted on 12/21/24 at 3:00 pm to StansberryRules
The problem is all the good teams are in the same conference. Simple as that.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 3:04 pm to Pimphand
quote:
Expanding to 8 was fine. Expanding to 12 and playing favorites to shitty conferences by giving them a bye fricked the whole thing up.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 3:26 pm to StansberryRules
Does anyone lose money on these shite games besides the fans of the losing team?
Posted on 12/21/24 at 3:28 pm to StansberryRules
It’ll go to 16.
And the reason being the answer to this question: Will you watch when it does?
I know I will.
And the reason being the answer to this question: Will you watch when it does?
I know I will.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 3:33 pm to StansberryRules
Expanding to 8 would have been perfect. This playoff without Indiana, SMU, Boise St and Tennessee would be perfect
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News