Started By
Message

Josh Pate believes radical changes are coming to the CFP in 2026

Posted on 12/11/24 at 4:28 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 4:28 am
This is what he thinks those changes will look like:

Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
19867 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:44 am to
It’s going to 16 teams next.

The idea that pate is pushing is just ignorant.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
26878 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:52 am to
I don't think it's ignorant, if your borderline it gives you a shot to get in instead of leaving it up to someone else's opinion. I see no problem with play in games
Posted by Mexican Martini
Member since Aug 2024
276 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 6:33 am to
Would be better than this although still flawed as an SEC 5 is often better than a Big 12 1 and therefore punishes teams for being a part of a difficult conference
Posted by Hater Bait
Tuscaloosa & Gulf Shores
Member since Nov 2012
3125 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 6:56 am to
More changes? There is no way they can frick up college football worse than they’ve already have.
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 6:58 am
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
72500 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 6:56 am to
Going to disagree with him about that being a bad idea. The idea of having play in games for two spots to represent your conference sounds fricking awesome.

The top two are guaranteed spots if they make the conference title game.

Then 3 plays 4 and 5 plays 6 for the other two spots. How is that a bad idea?
Posted by Hater Bait
Tuscaloosa & Gulf Shores
Member since Nov 2012
3125 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 6:59 am to
I didn’t even watch I just assumed it was going to be a terrible idea. Everything in the past 10 years has been terrible ideas
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
20279 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:09 am to
quote:

The idea that pate is pushing is just ignorant.

How so? Puts 4 teams in from the B1G and SEC and creates another weekend of quality games to watch between the best two conferences. CCGs are dead or, at least, they soon will be.
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
1857 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:10 am to
quote:

There is no way they can frick up college football worse than they’ve already have.


: chuckle.gif:
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
4035 Vanderbilt Lane
Member since Dec 2013
36960 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:11 am to
Does this bald retard own one shirt?
Posted by Opry
Member since Oct 2023
5204 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:11 am to
I like his ideas in this video. Hell of a lot better than what we have now. Also expand the playoffs and guarantee the SEC like 5 spots........and bring back a computer to pick the team on a BSC style rating.
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 7:21 am
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
6840 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:14 am to
quote:

I didn’t even watch I just assumed it was going to be a terrible idea. Everything in the past 10 years has been terrible ideas


Thank you. People weren’t happy with the old poll system, then people weren’t happy with the original BCS system, then people weren’t happy the new BCS system, then people weren’t happy with 4 team playoff picked by committee, now everyone hates the 16 team playoff picked by committee.

Just STOP
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14169 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:14 am to
I don't hate it but I have a better solution:
Use the BCS model with more weight to strength of schedule to pick the 8 best teams regardless of conference affiliation.
The fact that conference champions in weak conferences get a auto-bid is absurd and is an affront to selecting the best teams.
If teams like Boise St. want in then they need to either get in a power conference or at least schedule traditionally tougher out of conference opponents.
The SECC will always mean more because you know you will be facing a very strong power conference team and winning the game will assure your place in the playoffs.
So 8 teams would look something like this:
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Texas
4. Ohio St.
5. Penn St.
6. Tennessee
7. Notre Dame
8. Miami
Posted by Yeah Im Live Cali
Member since Oct 2024
228 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:14 am to
Maybe Bama can make the playoffs if it’s 16 teams…..maybe not
Posted by theCAW
Polk County
Member since Dec 2023
4135 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:15 am to
Josh Pate has to be the biggest retard in the college sports commentary sphere
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
1857 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:16 am to
quote:

The fact that conference champions in weak conferences get a auto-bid is absurd and is an affront to selecting the best teams.



Welcome to DEI football
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
21074 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:23 am to
12 is fine if they get rid of the auto bids and just go with the top 12 ranked teams.

16 is too many and 4 is way too few.

And FYI - no matter what number you put it at, there will always be bubble teams.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
17942 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Then 3 plays 4 and 5 plays 6 for the other two spots. How is that a bad idea?


It should be 3 vs 6 and 4 vs 5 if they’re going to play those games.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
10517 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:30 am to
There are models already in place in college football for the playoffs.

FCS has 24 teams make it. 10 conference champs and 14 at large. The top eight teams in the playoffs are seeded and receive first-round byes. Team pairing is determined by geographical proximity. No teams in the same conference get paired in the first and second rounds.

In D2, they divide the country into 4 regions, and the top 7 teams in each region get in. The top seed in each region gets a first round bye. The regions rotate as to which 2 face each other in the later rounds. Then, highest ranked team hosts until the championship game.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
7264 posts
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:40 am to
quote:

It’s going to 16 teams next.

The idea that pate is pushing is just ignorant.


Ignorant of what exactly? It may be unrealistic, but its a great idea
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter