Started By
Message
Your playoff teams are…
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:04 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:04 am
In no particular order:
Oregon
PSU
tOSU
Indiana
Boise State
Notre Dame
Arizona St
Clemson
SMU
UGA
Tejas
Tennessee
Oregon
PSU
tOSU
Indiana
Boise State
Notre Dame
Arizona St
Clemson
SMU
UGA
Tejas
Tennessee
3
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:06 am to Sid E Walker
Yes agree with this teams…and it’s a travesty that Boise State will get a bye instead of the Big 12 or ACC Champion.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:06 am to Sid E Walker
Nah I think Bama gets in.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:07 am to topcat88
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:19 am to Wishbone85
I agree with him.
Texas has ZERO TOP 25 wins and they lost to a backup QB.
Texas best wins are two losses.
Texas can’t be in according to bammer logic.
Texas has ZERO TOP 25 wins and they lost to a backup QB.
Texas best wins are two losses.
Texas can’t be in according to bammer logic.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:20 am to SECdragonmaster
Why should Texas be in over Ole Miss (or Bama for that matter).
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 7:21 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:21 am to Sid E Walker
The “committee” will either pick SMU to appease ACC, or pick Alabama to appease SEC.
Committee may act to preserve conference championship games.
The arguments over who is #12 are like who is the last #11 seed in March.
Several teams have a case for #12.
Committee may act to preserve conference championship games.
The arguments over who is #12 are like who is the last #11 seed in March.
Several teams have a case for #12.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:27 am to makersmark1
quote:
Committee may act to preserve conference championship games.
CFP doesn’t own conference championship games.
14 game playoffs already in the contract and where we are headed.
ACC is third highest paid conference. 2 teams keeps the equity alive.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:35 am to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
Why should Texas be in over Ole Miss (or Bama for that matter).
They had an easy schedule, no doubt. But...on the other hand, no easy teams beat them, either.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:40 am to makersmark1
quote:
Several teams have a case for #12.
I agree. If we had a 64 team PO #65 would be bitching. I don't care that much about us being #12 or #13. But, the committee needs to consider schedule strength because it's not even close. Do you want to encourage poor schedules or tough schedules in the future?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:43 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
Texas has ZERO TOP 25 wins and they lost to a backup QB.
Aaron makes a good point
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:47 am to bama1959
If a team has lost twice to another playoff team they shouldn’t be in. They had their shot.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:56 am to CSTXAG1
quote:
If a team has lost twice to another playoff team they shouldn’t be in. They had their shot.
If a team has lost 3 times, 2 of those losses to .500 teams including being held to 3 points by one of them and giving up 40 to the other, they should not be in...they had their shot...
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:04 am to Wishbone85
Texas has a 30th ranked SOS or higher with UGA game. SMU has 75th.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 9:04 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:08 am to RealDawg
quote:The opposite of competition.
equity
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News