Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Athletic Directors

Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:40 am
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
1169 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:40 am
How many of these guys actually have real business experience other than being in Academia? Why do they hand out long term contracts to these coaches with no escape clause if they prove to be failures? All they are doing is locking in financial hardship for the universities they represent. Asking for a friend
Posted by Hussss
Helena, AL
Member since Oct 2016
7482 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:42 am to
The market makes the contract(s) not the A.D.
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
1169 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:45 am to
No. They should be fired with the duds they hire. That goes back to the University Presidents and State boards of education. Stop this nonsense.
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
25567 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:48 am to
The old school ADs like Frank Broyles used to be former head coaches.

They don't do that anymore.
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
25567 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:51 am to
Jimmy Sexton is smarter than your average AD.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18426 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:59 am to
“Market rate” trills wil be here soon.

I say make it 4 years, no buyout IF losing season.
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
1169 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:00 am to
I think Mississippi has a state law restricting how long a contract can be given to state employees. Someone from Mississippi chime in. In my opinion this is the way to go to stop this nonsense.
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
2105 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:01 am to
Problem is that all these ADs don’t get together and share knowledge anymore.

These ADs should have semi annual meetings where they all discuss challenges facing the whole sport.

They could atleast share market knowledge so that these agents don’t bend them over and ram them in the arse with each and every contract.
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
8849 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:06 am to
That falls into anti-trust laws. You can talk about overall issues but not details like salaries.
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
1169 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:16 am to
State legislators can stop it. Don’t need Washington getting involved which I think is coming with this NIL nonsense going on.
Posted by Peter Ferrari
Quahog, RI
Member since Jul 2023
56 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:19 am to
These are all state schools, salaries/buyouts are publicly available.
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
1169 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 8:29 am to
States can limit lengths of contracts to state employees if they so desire. Maybe not the money but the length of time
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 8:30 am
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
8849 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

These are all state schools, salaries/buyouts are publicly available.


True, but the private schools don’t disclose. Price fixing salaries is not viewed as legal.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
34876 posts
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I think Mississippi has a state law restricting how long a contract can be given to state employees. Someone from Mississippi chime in. In my opinion this is the way to go to stop this nonsense.
True. 4 years. However, there is a work around if the contract is with the Foundation, a private entity not covered by state laws.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter