Started By
Message

Top graded QBs after week 1
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:14 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:14 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:24 am to Pickle_Weasel
???
Milroe graded at 98.7 after the weekend.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4432734/jalen-milroe
Milroe graded at 98.7 after the weekend.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4432734/jalen-milroe
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:27 am to iglass
That’s ESPN you posted. I think PFF has their own.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:32 am to JayAg
quote:
That’s ESPN you posted. I think PFF has their own.
Fair enough. I'd be interested in seeing PFF's criteria/methodology.. Because that's VASTLY different.
I mean... I'm not knocking their list - all of them had excellent performances this weekend. But not having Milroe on this list seems to me to be a glaring omission. Maybe they have a minimum throws requirement - Milroe only threw 9 times (7/9, 200 yds, 3 TDs, plus ran for 79 yds and 2 TDs.)
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:47 am to Pickle_Weasel
5 out of 10 have a 2 syllable first name and a 1 syllable last name.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:51 am to Pickle_Weasel
If you’d have told me a year ago that Payton Thorne would be listed on anyone’s “top graded QB” rankings, I’d have accused you of losing your mind.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:52 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
If you’d have told me a year ago that Payton Thorne would be listed on anyone’s “top graded QB” rankings, I’d have accused you of losing your mind.
I think Oxford High School could have beaten Alabama A&M.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:54 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
I think Oxford High School could have beaten Alabama A&M.
Same for Furman. That doesn’t change the fact that last season Payton Thorne played similarly bad opponents and looked inept doing it, while this past weekend looked like an entirely different QB.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 7:56 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:55 am to Pickle_Weasel
Maybe Jalen is not in their due to the limited number of attempts he had?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 7:58 am to iglass
ESPN’s QBR is complete shite and there’s no rhyme nor reason to it.
PFF’s is much better - in theory at least. It’s probably is the grading is done by humans and humans will not be objective. A lot of their individual QB metrics are great though, it’s just the sum of those parts don’t always jive with their overall scores.
PFF’s is much better - in theory at least. It’s probably is the grading is done by humans and humans will not be objective. A lot of their individual QB metrics are great though, it’s just the sum of those parts don’t always jive with their overall scores.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:03 am to iglass
He doesn't have enough attempts for some systems.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:09 am to iglass
quote:
I'd be interested in seeing PFF's criteria/methodology.. Because that's VASTLY different.
PFF seems to be hit or miss at best when it comes to grading most positions.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:16 am to Pickle_Weasel
Thorne Heisman loading…
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:20 am to Darth_Vader
quote:Wrong. Furman would have beaten everyone in the ACC not named Miami and then at least half the SEC.
Same for Furman.
We just made them look like a joke because of how good we are
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 8:20 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:21 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Wrong. Furman would have beaten everyone in the ACC not named Miami and then at least half the SEC.
To be fair, Furman would have beaten Ark PB and Alabama A&M by 5 TDs. Furman was a Quarterfinal FCS team last year. Still an FCS team but comparing Furman to Swac teams is like comparing Michigan to UMass.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:26 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Wrong. Furman would have beaten everyone in the ACC not named Miami and then at least half the SEC.
Please list off the 8 SEC teams Furman would beat.
quote:
We just made them look like a joke because of how good we are
Wrong. You made them look like a joke because you’re a SEC program playing a FCS team. It’s what SEC teams are supposed to do in these sort of games. We don’t beat our chest about it though. And to do so is frankly embarrassing.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 8:30 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:31 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Furman would have beaten Ark PB and Alabama A&M by 5 TDs.
Only an Ole Miss fan would stoop to “my cupcake is better than your cupcake”.
Hang a banner. You’ve sure got room for it.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 8:32 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:35 am to Rzrbackguy
quote:
Only an Ole Miss fan would stoop to “my cupcake is better than your cupcake”.
He’s making a complete arse of himself and embarrassing the Ole Miss fanbase. Look, we all play at least one cupcake game a year. It’s good practice and gives the cupcake a nice payday to bankroll their program. But when we beat them down like a rented mule, we don’t beat our best over it because beating them down is what we’re expected to do. And we certainly don’t get delusions of grandeur about it.
And to claim Furman would beat “half the SEC” is just downright stupid.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 8:37 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 8:41 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
He’s making a complete arse of himself and embarrassing the Ole Miss fanbase.
This board is a joke and you Ole Miss fans spent a decade trying to be cool with the other fanbases. HJJ is the worst of all. I couldn't give a frick what you guys think of me. I'm here to win and talk shite. That's what this board is for. If you are here to make friends go back to he Matt Luke Era.
PB, Alabama A&M and Furman all suck. But Swac is a different level of suck. We learned nothing about anyone playing an FCS school this week. Period.
Popular
Back to top


9








