Started By
Message
EA 2024 Defense Rankings
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:06 pm
Ohio State - 96 OVR
Georgia - 94 OVR
Oregon - 90 OVR
Alabama - 90 OVR
Clemson - 90 OVR
Notre Dame - 90 OVR
Michigan - 90 OVR
Texas - 88 OVR
Penn State - 88 OVR
Utah - 88 OVR
Florida State - 88 OVR
Oklahoma - 88 OVR
Iowa - 88 OVR
Virginia Tech - 86 OVR
Wisconsin - 86 OVR
USC - 86 OVR
Auburn - 86 OVR
LSU - 84 OVR
Texas A&M - 84 OVR
Colorado - 84 OVR
Oklahoma State - 84 OVR
Louisville - 84 OVR
North Carolina - 84 OVR
Kansas State - 84 OVR
Florida - 84 OVR
EA
Georgia - 94 OVR
Oregon - 90 OVR
Alabama - 90 OVR
Clemson - 90 OVR
Notre Dame - 90 OVR
Michigan - 90 OVR
Texas - 88 OVR
Penn State - 88 OVR
Utah - 88 OVR
Florida State - 88 OVR
Oklahoma - 88 OVR
Iowa - 88 OVR
Virginia Tech - 86 OVR
Wisconsin - 86 OVR
USC - 86 OVR
Auburn - 86 OVR
LSU - 84 OVR
Texas A&M - 84 OVR
Colorado - 84 OVR
Oklahoma State - 84 OVR
Louisville - 84 OVR
North Carolina - 84 OVR
Kansas State - 84 OVR
Florida - 84 OVR
EA
This post was edited on 6/27/24 at 12:07 pm
13
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:07 pm to Jebadeb
People will complain about any rankings sent out but these are fine with me. The only problem I have is Colorado way too high in both offense and defense
Also, these rankings only matter for like a month since they will probably update all the ratings based on results throughout the year
Also, these rankings only matter for like a month since they will probably update all the ratings based on results throughout the year
This post was edited on 6/27/24 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:09 pm to Jebadeb
lol USC being in the top 50 would be too high, but 16th???? Colorado??
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:10 pm to Jebadeb
LSU too high. 
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:10 pm to Jebadeb
LSU too high.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:10 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
People will complain about any rankings sent out but these are fine with me
I think our Defensive will be right around the 25 mark so I'm not gonna sweat it when I don't see them listed.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:11 pm to Jebadeb
I compared these to the NCAA and ESPN stats from last season.
They are completely different.
They must be using a lot more data in their formula for ranking them.
They are completely different.
They must be using a lot more data in their formula for ranking them.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:16 pm to Jebadeb
I’m doing either UTEP or Kennesaw as my dynasty. Did either of them make the top 25??
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:19 pm to Jebadeb
I thought LSU was bad here but...
Holy shite
quote:
USC - 86 OVR
quote:
Colorado - 84 OVR
Holy shite
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:19 pm to thunderbird1100
Agreed usc is woiser
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:20 pm to rtr23242526
I'm rolling with the Tide again #23 natty
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:21 pm to thunderbird1100
If Colorado is 20th here and 8th on offense, that must mean they thin they are at least a preseason top 15 team
Talk about hype machine engaged, but CU got popular last year and they want to capitalize on that without a doubt. Their product is to sell games ultimately. Making Colorado look good will help that
Talk about hype machine engaged, but CU got popular last year and they want to capitalize on that without a doubt. Their product is to sell games ultimately. Making Colorado look good will help that
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:21 pm to Jebadeb
You can tell they just decided to put the biggest brands at the top. Colorado is arse but Deion has done a great job marketing them and so EA assumes people will want to play with them, so they made them way better than they should be just for that reason.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:22 pm to That LSU Guy
quote:
LSU too high.
It's equal to Colorado, so maybe it's accurate?
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:22 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
these rankings only matter for like a month since they will probably update all the ratings based on results throughout the year
That's a good point. I disagree with a lot of these, but they should adjust.
The problem is I'm not seeing much logic in the rankings as is, so if logic isn't there initially it won't be there for updates either.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:23 pm to Monsusta
quote:
They must be using a lot more data in their formula for ranking them.
Here is the secret formula:
If you rank the teams with a lot of fans higher, they are more likely to buy the game.
Rinse and repeat every year.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:30 pm to Monsusta
Pretty sure it's simply based on the ratings of the players. Stats are relative and dependent on who you play.
This post was edited on 6/27/24 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:32 pm to Jebadeb
Colorado was 4-8 last season...but both units are ranked in the top 25?
SC was 4-8 with a a far tougher schedule.
SC was 4-8 with a a far tougher schedule.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:33 pm to 3down10
quote:exactly. Which is why Colorado is rated so high. They know people are going to want to play with them and Deion has attracted a lot of fans.
Here is the secret formula: If you rank the teams with a lot of fans higher, they are more likely to buy the game. Rinse and repeat every year.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News