Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

OU & Texas football - which loses to Vandy first?

Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:42 pm
Posted by everytrueson
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2012
6510 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:42 pm
And why will it inevitably be ZeroU?



Posted by Shea Vinnerbush
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2023
2162 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:46 pm to
Missouri sure as hell wasn't good enough last time we played

Posted by Lucado
Member since Nov 2023
3497 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:48 pm to
Texas has a losing record against Vandy.
Posted by Shea Vinnerbush
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2023
2162 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:51 pm to
And a winning record against LSU
Posted by Lucado
Member since Nov 2023
3497 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:55 pm to
Doesn't make it any less funny that you have a losing record to Vanderbilt.
Posted by Shea Vinnerbush
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2023
2162 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:55 pm to
It does make our winning record against LSU even funnier, though
Posted by everytrueson
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2012
6510 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:13 pm to
I have learned a lot in this thread.

But I still think it will end up being Oklahoma. They will be to the SEC what Nebraska is to the big 10.
Posted by MOJO_ERASER
Tulsa Oklahoma
Member since Jun 2017
5839 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:44 pm to
Another loser post from a loser poster from a loser program..... OU>Missouri always on your mind every day!
BTW stop listening to our sports radio shows ......you got your own.....
This post was edited on 1/4/24 at 10:46 pm
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:54 pm to
LSU was winless vs Vandy over the same period they played Texas.

Posted by 49 to nada
In aggy and gooner heads, rent free
Member since Sep 2023
3450 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Texas has a losing record against Vandy.
In the leather helmet days? Only aggy hangs on to stuff like that lol.
Posted by everytrueson
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2012
6510 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:58 pm to
Radio shows?! Was this an actual topic on Oklahoma radio?!



Posted by Tenn grad LSU fan
Woulhuntdn't you like to know spazz
Member since Apr 2023
1052 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:59 pm to
Yeah it does you open you big trap before think8ng it through lol lsu is owned by texas
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 10:04 am to
quote:

In the leather helmet days?


Actually half of those matchups were pre leatherhead days.

Posted by Sooner a Reb
Maryland
Member since Jan 2017
1353 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:52 pm to
I guarantee NEITHER of them will lose to Vandy 3 times in their first 10 SEC meetings like Mizzou did.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Sooner a Reb
Maryland
Member since Jan 2017
1353 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

But I still think it will end up being Oklahoma. They will be to the SEC what Nebraska is to the big 10.

Say you don't understand College Football, without saying you don't understand College Football.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
12339 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:05 pm to


They have this clownboy narrative around here that we're going to become "the new Nerbrasky!".

They can't say why or how, nor do they understand the root cause of "Nerbasky's" troubles, they just need to believe it. Just laugh at them.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 3:09 pm
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
2015 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

They have this clownboy narrative around here that we're going to become "the new Nerbrasky!".



It is pretty easy to see how someone who is from the SEC and doesn't understand the nuanced differences between the two programs/situations might think that.

All they see is two old Big 8 "midwestern" schools in low population states... and that light goes off in the geographically challenged heads.

But until the state of Texas moves from it's current spot or all the sudden quits producing recruits...the Oklahoma/Nebraska parallels won't be legitimate.
Posted by BigScoreboard
Member since May 2021
1369 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:23 pm to
Neither - never gonna happen
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
12339 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:27 pm to
Don't bring geography into this. It confuses the peanut gallery.
Posted by Sooner a Reb
Maryland
Member since Jan 2017
1353 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

It is pretty easy to see how someone who is from the SEC and doesn't understand the nuanced differences between the two programs/situations might think that.

All they see is two old Big 8 "midwestern" schools in low population states... and that light goes off in the geographically challenged heads.

But until the state of Texas moves from it's current spot or all the sudden quits producing recruits...the Oklahoma/Nebraska parallels won't be legitimate.

It goes a lot deeper than that. Those mentioning the recruiting differences are spot on, but it also goes back to the 1 gray shirt rule. But the big thing was Tom Osborne. Tom Osborne had every high school team in Nebraska running his system. Every Junior High running his system. Every peewee football program running his system. This meant when the lesser athletes went to play for the university they always had 10-12 years in his system. They ran the option flawlessly and everyone knew exactly what to do in every situation. It was an extreme case of not having the best talent but being perfect with the talent they did have. When Tom left, it all fell apart. They couldn't recruit the talent to compete.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 3:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter