Started By
Message
OU & Texas football - which loses to Vandy first?
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:42 pm
And why will it inevitably be ZeroU?
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:46 pm to everytrueson
Missouri sure as hell wasn't good enough last time we played
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:48 pm to everytrueson
Texas has a losing record against Vandy.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:51 pm to Lucado
And a winning record against LSU
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:55 pm to Shea Vinnerbush
Doesn't make it any less funny that you have a losing record to Vanderbilt.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:55 pm to Lucado
It does make our winning record against LSU even funnier, though
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:13 pm to Shea Vinnerbush
I have learned a lot in this thread.
But I still think it will end up being Oklahoma. They will be to the SEC what Nebraska is to the big 10.
But I still think it will end up being Oklahoma. They will be to the SEC what Nebraska is to the big 10.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:44 pm to everytrueson
Another loser post from a loser poster from a loser program..... OU>Missouri always on your mind every day!
BTW stop listening to our sports radio shows ......you got your own.....
BTW stop listening to our sports radio shows ......you got your own.....
This post was edited on 1/4/24 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:54 pm to Lucado
LSU was winless vs Vandy over the same period they played Texas.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:57 pm to Lucado
quote:In the leather helmet days? Only aggy hangs on to stuff like that lol.
Texas has a losing record against Vandy.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:58 pm to MOJO_ERASER
Radio shows?! Was this an actual topic on Oklahoma radio?!
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:59 pm to Lucado
Yeah it does you open you big trap before think8ng it through lol lsu is owned by texas
Posted on 1/5/24 at 10:04 am to 49 to nada
quote:
In the leather helmet days?
Actually half of those matchups were pre leatherhead days.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:52 pm to everytrueson
I guarantee NEITHER of them will lose to Vandy 3 times in their first 10 SEC meetings like Mizzou did.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:54 pm to everytrueson
quote:
But I still think it will end up being Oklahoma. They will be to the SEC what Nebraska is to the big 10.
Say you don't understand College Football, without saying you don't understand College Football.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:05 pm to Sooner a Reb
They have this clownboy narrative around here that we're going to become "the new Nerbrasky!".
They can't say why or how, nor do they understand the root cause of "Nerbasky's" troubles, they just need to believe it. Just laugh at them.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:17 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
They have this clownboy narrative around here that we're going to become "the new Nerbrasky!".
It is pretty easy to see how someone who is from the SEC and doesn't understand the nuanced differences between the two programs/situations might think that.
All they see is two old Big 8 "midwestern" schools in low population states... and that light goes off in the geographically challenged heads.
But until the state of Texas moves from it's current spot or all the sudden quits producing recruits...the Oklahoma/Nebraska parallels won't be legitimate.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:23 pm to everytrueson
Neither - never gonna happen
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:27 pm to Gunga Din
Don't bring geography into this. It confuses the peanut gallery.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 3:51 pm to Gunga Din
quote:
It is pretty easy to see how someone who is from the SEC and doesn't understand the nuanced differences between the two programs/situations might think that.
All they see is two old Big 8 "midwestern" schools in low population states... and that light goes off in the geographically challenged heads.
But until the state of Texas moves from it's current spot or all the sudden quits producing recruits...the Oklahoma/Nebraska parallels won't be legitimate.
It goes a lot deeper than that. Those mentioning the recruiting differences are spot on, but it also goes back to the 1 gray shirt rule. But the big thing was Tom Osborne. Tom Osborne had every high school team in Nebraska running his system. Every Junior High running his system. Every peewee football program running his system. This meant when the lesser athletes went to play for the university they always had 10-12 years in his system. They ran the option flawlessly and everyone knew exactly what to do in every situation. It was an extreme case of not having the best talent but being perfect with the talent they did have. When Tom left, it all fell apart. They couldn't recruit the talent to compete.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 3:52 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News