Started By
Message
Fans of the Original 10 SEC Teams
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:01 pm
What are your thoughts on the six expansion teams? We know most would have preferred the SEC stayed at 10 teams, but here we are.
1. Arkansas
2. South Carolina
3. Missouri
4. Texas A&M
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas
1. Arkansas
2. South Carolina
3. Missouri
4. Texas A&M
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas
49
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:04 pm to gamecockman12
We can all talk shite about them, but they are solid additions.
Arkansas being my favorite of the bunch.
Arkansas being my favorite of the bunch.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:04 pm to gamecockman12
I've had the same amount of worries about the expansion teams as the expansion teams have conference football championships
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:06 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Apparently LSU has a losing record to Missouri. I’d be worried.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:07 pm to gamecockman12
I have a feeling the team that has been to the most conference championships will be the least favorite.
Wonder why?
Wonder why?
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:07 pm to father2sons
quote:
Apparently LSU has a losing record to Missouri. I’d be worried
I'm not
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:07 pm to gamecockman12
Cackalak and Arky are the only 2 that belong.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:08 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Conclusion of Week 6 will be fun.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:10 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
1. Arkansas
2. South Carolina
3. Missouri
4. Texas A&M
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas
Five outta six are their State's Flagship Institutions of Higher Learning.
Is there another conference that can boast as many Flagship Universities in their conference?
We've got Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas.
12 of 16.
Non flagships ... Auburn, Vandy, Miss State, A&M.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:10 pm to father2sons
quote:
Apparently LSU has a losing record to Missouri. I’d be worried.
3 game sample size?
Cute.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:11 pm to gamecockman12
1. Arkansas -- good fans, glad to have them.
2. South Carolina -- Spurrier made them legit.
3. Missouri -- They're in the conference, really?
4. Texas A&M -- LSU's ghey cousin from eTx.
5. Oklahoma -- Bring that wagon to Jordan-Hare, I'd like to see it.
6. Texas -- Meh, even Vandy used to be good once upon a time.
2. South Carolina -- Spurrier made them legit.
3. Missouri -- They're in the conference, really?
4. Texas A&M -- LSU's ghey cousin from eTx.
5. Oklahoma -- Bring that wagon to Jordan-Hare, I'd like to see it.
6. Texas -- Meh, even Vandy used to be good once upon a time.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:11 pm to wadewilson
I just had to take shot. It’s the Bama in me.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:11 pm to wadewilson
About to be 4.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:11 pm to gamecockman12
Arkansas and USC might as well be original members to people my age.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:11 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
1. Arkansas
2. South Carolina
3. Missouri
4. Texas A&M
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas
Well rounded athletically. Combined with the original 10, we should dominate almost every playoff in every sport.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:12 pm to RamboMizzou
quote:
About to be 4.
Cool.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:14 pm to gamecockman12
Missouri??? They exist??? Gun to your head name 3 Missouri players ever
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:14 pm to gamecockman12
I just want to chime in and say Mizzou can frick off.
There is nothing "southern," much less "southeastern" about Columbia, Missouri, which is closer to Lawrence, KS, Manhattan, KS, Ames, IA, and Champaign, IL, than it is to Fayetteville. It's a midwestern, "Great Plains" school and they need to frick off.
Furthermore, Mizzou is not and has never been the biggest draw in their state. You can't say that about any other SEC school. They're simply not a cultural fit and, to be honest, their addition to this conference represents everything wrong with college athletics: forsaking tradition for the potential to make money.
There is nothing "southern," much less "southeastern" about Columbia, Missouri, which is closer to Lawrence, KS, Manhattan, KS, Ames, IA, and Champaign, IL, than it is to Fayetteville. It's a midwestern, "Great Plains" school and they need to frick off.
Furthermore, Mizzou is not and has never been the biggest draw in their state. You can't say that about any other SEC school. They're simply not a cultural fit and, to be honest, their addition to this conference represents everything wrong with college athletics: forsaking tradition for the potential to make money.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:16 pm to bootymane
quote:
Gun to your head name 3 Missouri players ever
They had that gay dude, and the qb that the douchey Texas coach made fun of, and......Mekhi Wingo, formerly.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:16 pm to father2sons
quote:
but they are solid additions.
Missouri has not been a solid addition unless you are a good team looking for an automatic win. After their first couple years in the SEC they have been bad. Playing baseball in Missouri to start the season in February and March time frame is absolutely brutal weather wise if you have to play there.
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News