Started By
Message
re: Why the lack of bluebloods in the SEC?
Posted on 7/9/22 at 1:06 am to Gaggle
Posted on 7/9/22 at 1:06 am to Gaggle
LINK
Here’s a link to the current year’s national champions in each sport. Notice the number of SEC members and members-to-be titles vs the number from the Big 10. Maryland won the lacrosse title and Penn State won wrestling but then again, Pedo U has always excelled at pinning young men to something haven’t they? Ohio State has the nation’s best women’s hockey team. Congratulations. Your bitches obviously have the bigger balls in Columbus.
I’m pretty certain this year reflects a growing trend of SEC and other southern teams dominating in all but the winter sports. Pretty soon, all you’ll have left will be your hockey and cross country skiing teams to brag about. Have fun with that.
Here’s a link to the current year’s national champions in each sport. Notice the number of SEC members and members-to-be titles vs the number from the Big 10. Maryland won the lacrosse title and Penn State won wrestling but then again, Pedo U has always excelled at pinning young men to something haven’t they? Ohio State has the nation’s best women’s hockey team. Congratulations. Your bitches obviously have the bigger balls in Columbus.
I’m pretty certain this year reflects a growing trend of SEC and other southern teams dominating in all but the winter sports. Pretty soon, all you’ll have left will be your hockey and cross country skiing teams to brag about. Have fun with that.
0
Posted on 7/9/22 at 1:45 am to BuckI
Blue blood is meaningless, especially when you guys mainly have national titles only your grand parents can remember… Ohio State would not have the record they do if they competed in the SEC since it’s inception. Same for any other “blue blood” program.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 2:00 am to BuckI
Don’t sleep on Vandy bowling.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 2:58 am to BuckI
quote:
BuckI
quote:
For all of their success it is hard to believe that they have only 1 blueblood
LINK
Just do not see Ohio State on this link.
Many of the schools listed have championships in low profile sports like wrestling, indoor track, tennis, skiing, Rifle and golf but championships.
Are you considering all sport of just the 4 major programs Football, Basketball, Baseball and Track & Field.
Recent or yesteryear.
I consider true championships that were won on the field through tournament play not by media the way football was chosen prior to the BCS.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 4:03 am to BuckI
Your best coach ever lost to a grass eater
Posted on 7/9/22 at 6:19 am to BuckI
Ohio state is not a blueblood
Posted on 7/9/22 at 8:58 am to BuckI
We coming 
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:03 am to magildachunks
quote:
This one is not like the others.
Yeah since we have the most recent natty and are way more consistent than LSU I would assume you mean we are a cut above.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:04 am to BuckI
serious question for you. Why does Ohio State sign so many players from the deep South? I can only assume the midwest doesn't produce many elite athletes.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:07 am to Carolina_Girl
Mic drop.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:09 am to BuckI
quote:
Basketball. That's cute.
Are you guys still chasing UCLA?
Of all the replies... the OP responds with this first. So, the OP is either a troll... a pussy... scared to respond, because he has none or all the above.
But if the SEC only has one blueblood program then maybe tosu should use that as a model for success.
For the record... I'm leaning towards the OP being a pussy.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:11 am to magildachunks
quote:
This one is not like the others
True. Georgia is the reigning national champions of college football. The other two are not.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:14 am to BuckI
Lol
0-1 vs GA
0-2 vs FL
0-1-1 vs Auburn
0-2 vs SC
1-4 vs AL
0-1 vs TN
1-1-1 vs LSU
That 2-10-2 against the Big 6 in the SEC
Ohio State has 1 win, ONE WIN against an SEC team since 1990. You’d have 2 but you vacated your sugar bowl win over Arkansas.
UGA is 11-3 against the B1G, and that’s almost exclusively against winning Big 10 teams in Bowl games. Or in other words a .786 winning percentage. Meanwhile Ohio States winning percentage all time against the Big 10 including the slappy’s is .747.
Why is Georgia more successful against the Big 10 than Ohio State Sir Blueblood?
0-1 vs GA
0-2 vs FL
0-1-1 vs Auburn
0-2 vs SC
1-4 vs AL
0-1 vs TN
1-1-1 vs LSU
That 2-10-2 against the Big 6 in the SEC
Ohio State has 1 win, ONE WIN against an SEC team since 1990. You’d have 2 but you vacated your sugar bowl win over Arkansas.
UGA is 11-3 against the B1G, and that’s almost exclusively against winning Big 10 teams in Bowl games. Or in other words a .786 winning percentage. Meanwhile Ohio States winning percentage all time against the Big 10 including the slappy’s is .747.
Why is Georgia more successful against the Big 10 than Ohio State Sir Blueblood?
This post was edited on 7/9/22 at 9:31 am
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:25 am to Gaggle
quote:
Tennessee was a blueblood of the 20th century.
No, they were not.
Their heyday was between 1925-1960. Aside from a few years here and there in the 60s, 70s, and 80s, they were a very bipolar program with ups and downs. Fulmer brought them back to the prominence they enjoyed under Neyland for a few years but that run only lasted from 1995-2001. And even though they were one of the best programs in college football during that time, they won the conference but twice and were consistently thwarted by Florida.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:29 am to Porter Osborne Jr
You still trying to elevate uga ahead of LSU. You simply don’t have the hardware in the trophy case. And yes based upon how long college football has been played 2000 until now is recent!
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:48 am to MEd LSU
UGA and LSU as programs is a hair splitting exercise. UGA has more wins, a higher winning percentage, more bowl games, more bowl wins, more SEC Championships, LSU has a 4-3 NC edge and has the head to head. Both are top 12 all time programs. You’ll get no disrespect to LSU from this Dawg fan.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 9:50 am to BuckI
The only blue blood here is Kentucky in basketball.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 11:21 am to BuckI
It's because most SEC teams don't have the same history/tradition as the mid-west teams.
Alabama is the exception.
Alabama is the exception.
Posted on 7/9/22 at 11:31 am to MEd LSU
quote:
You still trying to elevate uga ahead of LSU. You simply don’t have the hardware in the trophy case
Still, I've never once said they were but your response reeks of insecurity
Posted on 7/9/22 at 1:01 pm to BuckI
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News