Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:50 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:50 am to Draconian Sanctions
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
11
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:52 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
Because outside of Georgia, Bama, Florida, Auburn, and UTe, who has 2 true rivals?
Eta
I want 3-6 personally but I see why some schools like USC, Kentucky, Arkansas, State, Mizzou, would want 1-7
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 10:53 am
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:53 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years
In 15-20 years the SEC will more closely resemble the NFL than it will the SEC of 1970
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:27 am to WG_Dawg
So you play your “rival” every other year. What’s the problem?
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:38 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
I think saying it would “kill the SEC as we’ve known it” is an overreaction, but 100% agree a 3-6 format is the way to go.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:42 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
Disagree. LSU hasn’t played in Athens since 2013. Tennessee hasn’t played in Baton Rouge since 2010.
It makes no sense to not have conference members play one another more than once or twice a decade, just so UGA can have its annual “rivalry” games with UF, Auburn, and Tennessee.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 4:46 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
Cry more
Posted on 6/6/22 at 5:29 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
Because they don't give a frick bout anything by money
Posted on 6/6/22 at 7:59 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
his would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
Agreed this is some really stupid shite. I grew up an SEC fan and there is too much history to just throw it away with 1-7
Posted on 6/6/22 at 8:03 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years
I’m pretty sure it’s dead already
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:17 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
We are already on a downward spiral.
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:55 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
this would not only be logically stupid but would pretty much kill the SEC as we've known it for nearly 100 years. It is baffling why anyone would think this is the best method instead of having 3 permanent opponents.
How in the world will this kill the SEC?
I thought it would be 3-6 also but someone much smarter than me pointed something out that I never considered.
The SEC has a new contract with ESPN. Obviously the Conference would expect to get paid for a extra league game and ESPN would be under no obligation to so. The Schools will want to be be paid for that extra game to make up for the lost home game every other year.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News