Started By
Message
re: Old Recruiting Thread: RIP insiders
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:09 pm to Johnnycrane
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:09 pm to Johnnycrane
quote:
Auburn has been better than 8-5 historically.
Ehhhh that's about right actually
0
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:10 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
Id like to put it on my Yeti
If you would have gone off-brand instead of getting Yeti you could have gotten a few months of OTV
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:20 pm to TheJones
quote:Processed. Haven't kept up with his season, but I would be willing to go out on a limb and say the coaches haven't been overly impressed. Collins was probably our worst commit tbh.
Collins is more of a blocking TE, and JLee thinks them coming back is part of it. Not sure I buy that, I just think Collins sees the writing on the wall. He can probably go somewhere else and be a bigger asset than his role will be at Auburn
Hearing that Carter news after his visit is big. I was kind of worried about that one.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:57 pm to jt33
Can’t rule out Texas ever, but I don’t think the visit changed the calculus for him.
Need to close on House and Favour. IMO, Favour is a 4* candidate
Need to close on House and Favour. IMO, Favour is a 4* candidate
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:05 pm to TheJones
What about the trigonometry and algebra on him? I need all formulas equating to A+U.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:33 pm to AA7
quote:
If you would have gone off-brand instead of getting Yeti you could have gotten a few months of OTV
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:48 pm to Johnnycrane
quote:
Auburn has been better than 8-5 historically. Hell, they were the best team in the SEC in the 80 and 00s in terms of wins and loses.
Were you even alive in the 80's? I promise you I was and I watched them. I know what they are historically because we have had this conversation on this board 1000 times. Auburn historically is a 8-5 program. Just go do the math. If I remember well, it was something like 8.25 wins historically
quote:
You have the right to choose and not give cash brother.
quote:
My biggest issue is the people who complain about Auburn's product on the field, but are refusing to contribute ANYTHING
It sounds like I , and the other millions of people, dont have a choice. If we dont, we cant say anything about the program. Amirite?
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:49 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
By the way how is your take different from mine.
Pretty much the same but I worded it more TD friendly
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:50 pm to AA7
quote:
If you would have gone off-brand instead of getting Yeti you could have gotten a few months of OTV
Its true. No doubt.
But other brands wont fit. But I will get more out of my 110 that first perfectly in the front of my boat than I will giving money to Auburn who may or may not give it to a 17 year old to buy weed with. Hell, I raised 3 kids who I had to give money to for years. Ive done my part
Posted on 10/2/23 at 2:57 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
If I remember well, it was something like 8.25 wins historically
How do you even prove that?
Posted on 10/2/23 at 3:00 pm to HonorThyWarEagle
quote:
How do you even prove that?
Someone added up the games played vs games won. Cant remember..
I will look
ETA
Auburn Tigers football
All-time record 785–452–47 (.630)
If you convert that to todays 12 game schedule, 7-5 is (.714)
So we are not even a 7-5 program historically. I think a more realistic look, or one that really mattered to most of us, would be to look at the last 50 years.
That all time record counts back 100 years ago. And nobody but beatbamer was around then
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:26 pm to LanierSpots
7-5 is .583 not .714
You can just look at 785-452 and divide each by 100 and you get 7.85-4.52. So that’s the true reflection of Auburn all time. Better than 7-5 but not as good as 8-4.
You can just look at 785-452 and divide each by 100 and you get 7.85-4.52. So that’s the true reflection of Auburn all time. Better than 7-5 but not as good as 8-4.
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:31 pm to Dilligas
Laniers math was off but his point is still right. 63% win percentage has us as 7.5-4.5 on a 12 game season and 8.2-4.8 if you throw in a bowl game for a 13 game season.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:32 pm to LanierSpots
9-3 is as low as im willing to busge.
You're just pissing me off.
7-5 sucks.
You're just pissing me off.
7-5 sucks.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:32 pm to AA7
Yeah I get it. Just pointing out the math.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:40 pm to Dilligas
quote:
7-5 is .583 not .714
You can just look at 785-452 and divide each by 100 and you get 7.85-4.52. So that’s the true reflection of Auburn all time. Better than 7-5 but not as good as 8-4.
Yea, I wasnt comfortable with the way I did it so thanks.
I believe when we did this before, the last 40 years was a little better but still not better than 8-4
The numbers done lie. Unless I do the math
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:41 pm to jangalang
quote:
9-3 is as low as im willing to busge.
You're just pissing me off.
7-5 sucks.
History dont lie baw. If you dont like it, jump on the bandwagon and empty your saving for the NIL
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:42 pm to Johnnycrane
quote:
Hell, they were the best team in the SEC in the 00s in terms of wins and loses.
I attended probably 85% of our games (home and away) in the 00s. Unfortunately we were nowhere close to the best team in that timeframe. I'm not sure even sure we were top 4.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:42 pm to AA7
quote:
and 8.2-4.8 if you throw in a bowl game for a 13 game season.
Does that number reflect out bowl record or did you just count all the bowl games as wins?
Posted on 10/2/23 at 4:44 pm to LanierSpots
Well I guess we should just not try. Great motivation.
Just be happy to get to play the game.
This ain't upwards basketball bro.
Just be happy to get to play the game.
This ain't upwards basketball bro.
Page 315 of 836
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News