Started By
Message

re: Durkn? hate

Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:18 pm to
Posted by Hussss
Helena, AL
Member since Oct 2016
7777 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:18 pm to
Exactly

Durkin has just as good of a chance of turning things around as Sumrall, Lashlee, Dilly etc
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
51056 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:24 pm to
I am as high on Durkin as ever and hope he keeps it up.

I didn't like his press conference a whole lot. He seemed to stutter.
Posted by jvilletiger25
jacksonville, fl
Member since Jan 2014
20651 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Durkin has just as good of a chance of turning things around as Sumrall, Lashlee, Dilly etc


So 2 coaches that have won their conference and been in the playoffs vs a guy with a losing record and was run off in 2 years.

Posted by AU_ATL5
Member since Sep 2024
40 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:48 pm to
If we hire Durkin, we completely lose the benefit of his skills, which are coaching defense and calling plays.

The success of our defense would be entirely dependent on which defensive coordinator he hires, and not on Durkin's coaching skills, because Durkin would not be HC/DC, he'd be HC only.

The counter-argument might be that Durkin would still help direct the defense and continue the defense's success, but if that was true, then why didn't he do that at Maryland? His defenses were terrible at Maryland (an average of 76th in the country in total defense).

And as bad as his defenses were as head coach, his offenses were even worse, with an average ranking of 103rd in the country in total offense.

His tenure at Maryland suggests that he does not manage a program well, he does not hire well, and he does not direct the defense or offense well.

He's a very good defensive coordinator, but his resume as a head coach is horrific.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14454 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

The counter-argument might be that Durkin would still help direct the defense and continue the defense's success, but if that was true, then why didn't he do that at Maryland? His defenses were terrible at Maryland (an average of 76th in the country in total defense).
Universe of difference in the quality of player Maryland gets over Auburn. The list of legendary players Auburn has produced makes Maryland look like a Pee Wee team. Great coach with shitty talent is the same result as shitty coach with decent talent.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19634 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Then the 2 coaches after him went on to have better records than Mr. 5-19.
one of them is Matt Campbell, who’s probably one of thd best HCs in the country - midway thru his 10th season there, he’s 66-51

the other was Paul Rhoads, who got fired for going 5-19 his last two seasons



Posted by auyushu
Surprise, AZ
Member since Jan 2011
9781 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

His tenure at Maryland suggests that he does not manage a program well, he does not hire well, and he does not direct the defense or offense well.

He's a very good defensive coordinator, but his resume as a head coach is horrific.


Yep. People seem to be blinded by him being an excellent DC, thinking that will transfer to head coach.

I have a question for all the hire Durkin people. Can you name me a head coach that was struggling as a head coach, got fired, and then went on to have good success at another P4/P5 program as a head coach later in their career?

Because literally the only coach I can think of that fits that criteria is Lane Kiffin. And I wouldn't really fully count him so much as he had a 10 win season a year and half before they fired him at USC.

Can anyone think of any other examples?

I'm not trying to troll here, I'm legit curious if I'm forgetting folks.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14454 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

From 1995 to 1997, Michigan State finished 6–5–1, 6–6, and 7–5
Care to guess how that turned out for that coach?
Posted by auyushu
Surprise, AZ
Member since Jan 2011
9781 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Care to guess how that turned out for that coach?


That coach wasn't fired, so not sure what he has to do with my question. Try again, the question is coaches that were struggling and were fired that went on to have success.

There have been a ton of coaches over the years that bounced around 6-7 wins their first couple years and then had huge success. That's not uncommon at all. That's an apples to oranges comparison.
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 11:15 pm
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
23797 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Can you name me a head coach that was struggling as a head coach, got fired, and then went on to have good success at another P4/P5 program as a head coach later in their career?

quote:

Can anyone think of any other examples?

Ed Orgeron. Granted, he couldnt sustain the success. But it did happen.

Maybe Houston Nutt could kinda count. He "resigned" from Arkansas, but it was widely known they were about to fire him. He got Arky and couple SEC West titles but was mediocre to bad the rest of the time. He then went on to finish 2nd in the western in his first year at Ole Miss.

Lou Holtz (dont know if he was actually fired or not. I will lean he wasn't since he was only there for like 2 seasons. But he struggled so im putting him in) was a few games under .500 at Minnesota before going to Notre Dame and winning a title.

Yes, its rare, but not unheard of so i understand where you're coming from. And it has been a while as far as I know. These were just off the top of my head.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18973 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:04 am to
quote:

I know there were the "toxic culture" accusations at Maryland, but it seems like every dude on our defense absolutely loves the guy. They sure as hell play hard for him.


He had a player get heat stroke and die doing wind sprints where the OLmen were asked to perform 110 yard sprints....and were given 19 seconds.

They then brought in a panel of academics to look at the "culture". They found where one player who was overweight and not following prescribed training.....was forced to eat candy bars on the sidelines while his teammates practiced. Heaven forbid.

Can you imagine Bear Bryant and the Junction Boys, or Pat Dye kicking players off the program in front of the team because they would not run stadium steps and put blood on the saddle......in today's culture?

There is a reason the players love Durkin. He is a hard arse, he expects performance and discipline. Most of these kids have no father and little discipline and are coddled throughout high school. The good ones long for that sense of order.

Promote him, pay the bucks to bring in an OC the likes of Mike Leach or Gorgeous Borges and rock this program.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
20524 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:15 am to
quote:

We will look like a totally different team against Vandy and will beat them quite easily


Put down the crack pipe.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
20524 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:20 am to
quote:

The list of legendary players Auburn has produced makes Maryland look like a Pee Wee team.


Randy White says hi.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6644 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:42 am to
quote:

Universe of difference in the quality of player Maryland gets over Auburn.


Let's just drop this crap. That ship has sailed. I heard the same garbage about Freeze and Liberty and we did recruit well and we're possibly headed towards our fourth losing season in a row.

It's about management, evaluation, organization and public relations. So far, Durkin has proven lacking given - admittedly - a very small sample size. We may have to roll the dice on a coaching hire no matter what, but I'm uncomfortable not making a clean break from the Freeze era. It screams retaining coaches, bad practices and expectations we need to move away from.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 5:43 am
Posted by AUIH1
Logan Martin Lake, Talladega, AL
Member since Oct 2012
261 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:44 am to
I would like for us to hire a coach that hasn't been fired and is on an upward trajectory. I also would like to hire someone with as little baggage as possible after Hugh. So sign me up for a Sumrall, Golesh - type of hire. I want us to find our Kirby or Lanning.
Posted by Ccslimm
DC
Member since Nov 2016
742 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:35 am to
Exactly, we just had this happen with Freeze. In this league you cant just out talent teams, they get 5 and 4 stars too. You have to develop those players.

Cam Coleman is basically playing on pure Talent, he isnt being developed
Posted by jvilletiger25
jacksonville, fl
Member since Jan 2014
20651 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:38 am to
quote:

I would like for us to hire a coach that hasn't been fired and is on an upward trajectory. I also would like to hire someone with as little baggage as possible after Hugh.


Exactly
Posted by Beachbum87
Niceville, FL
Member since Oct 2022
4305 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Cam Coleman is basically playing on pure Talent, he isnt being developed


Is this a Marcus Davis issue? Can he actually coach the position? Probably a moot point because he most likely won’t be retained by the new HC.
Posted by auyushu
Surprise, AZ
Member since Jan 2011
9781 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Ed Orgeron. Granted, he couldnt sustain the success 


This is a good example. And probably the closest to a Durkin type situation working out.

quote:

Lou Holtz (dont know if he was actually fired or not


Holtz wasn't fired, he had a history of success with NC St and USC and was trying to do a full rebuild at Minn. Minn fans at the time were kinda pissed he bailed on them to take the ND job. You don't go straight from being the head coach of Minn to ND if people think you are sucking.

Houston Nutt isn't really a fit here to me, though I can see why you'd kinda count him. He led Arky to their longest period of sustained success in a while, and bounced before they got completely done to the point of firing him (he wasn't struggling really when he left, coming off 10-4 and 8-4 seasons). Nutt is more of a Jimbo situation, leaving and going somewhere else, have some success and then fall on your face. Plus, I wouldn't consider his Ole Miss tenure successful. If we are calling him successful there I'd have to consider Kiffin successful at USC (which I think we can agree he wasn't).

I guess if we are talking about Ed O here, we can also add Chizik, since Ed O's LSU tenure was just a slightly better version of Chizik here.

quote:

its rare, but not unheard of so i understand where you're coming from.


Yeah, when we are having to use guys like Ed O and Chizik, I'd say it's rare (and not exactly sustained success). I think what makes it even more unlikely to me is that Durkin's mentor coach is Muschamp, who is basically the archetype for amazing DC, bad head coach.

Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:51 am to
quote:

That coach wasn't fired, so not sure what he has to do with my question. Try again, the question is coaches that were struggling and were fired that went on to have success.

Durkin wasn't fired due to his win/loss record.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter