Started By
Message

re: Auburn hires Arizona State OC Chip Lindsey

Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:35 am to
Posted by DuncanIdaho
Ouray, CO
Member since Feb 2013
14970 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:35 am to
Does Marcello not remember that Tuberville, the architect of the modern 3-2 football game once fired Mazzone and it's taken him over a decade to get back into the SEC??

I agree on Yurchich!
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44870 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:49 am to
Another interesting point is the SEC seems to be trending air raid. Ole Miss when chest deep.
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29651 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Mazzone


There are other people I would rather have, but he has come a long way since his days at Auburn.
Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:17 am to
Would love to see some of these ideas in our offense next season

That site has some great breakdowns of their offense and you can see some of the concepts Yurcich likes to use. For the Briles fans he uses some similar ideas from that offense which I think would work well for us. Mainly I love his use of RPOs. I think with a running threat like Pettway, deep threat in Kyle Davis in the slot and Stidham's arm we could have a lot of success using some of these looks

Edit: It's interesting more I read from Oklahoma State fans they are frustrated by his run scheme while we are frustrated with Malzahn's pass scheme
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 8:20 am
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Another interesting point is the SEC seems to be trending air raid. Ole Miss when chest deep.


Which I do not understand. What has ever been won with that type of offense?


Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44870 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:29 am to
The Pats run it. But I agree. You need very high QB play, and development. The reason DT offensive is so effective in college is you don't need the QB adjusting to the D. He just reads and reacts. If we had a Brady, Manning, and 5-6 years to develop them, then I would be down.
Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Which I do not understand. What has ever been won with that type of offense?


More teams are blending Air Raid passing concepts with usually some sort of zone run scheme. Obviously you need to run the ball to win championships but with the growth of RPOs you can use air raid passing concepts off of your run game
Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:40 am to
pulled a Brannigan
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 8:41 am
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:42 am to
quote:

pulled a Brannigan


splain yourself...


Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:43 am to
well more of a half Brannigan only a double post
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:44 am to
quote:

The Pats run it. But I agree. You need very high QB play, and development. The reason DT offensive is so effective in college is you don't need the QB adjusting to the D. He just reads and reacts. If we had a Brady, Manning, and 5-6 years to develop them, then I would be down.





NFL and college are totally different. I still do not know why we are so obsessed with trying to throw the ball more. I understand having the threat and using it on play action or getting the defense on their heals but our offense with Gus at the controls revolves around running the ball 70% of the time.

Why not just concentrate on what we can do and what has worked for us. Not what others do.

Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44870 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:48 am to
I think the problem has been with everyone converting to the spread, the stock pile of available QBs has hit their bottom limit. It is a economic principle. When there is a surplus, exploit it until the competition enters the market, then move on the greener pastures.
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
3946 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I understand having the threat and using it on play action or getting the defense on their heals but our offense with Gus at the controls revolves around running the ball 70% of the time.

Why not just concentrate on what we can do and what has worked for us. Not what others do.



Idk if you noticed but it's not working anymore.
Posted by AuSteeler
montgomery. AL
Member since Jan 2015
2989 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:05 am to
That's the problem. Running the ball 70& is not winning for us. We simply don't have a good optional passing game to open the running game up to.

And the NFL is perfect for trying to get a good balance between running and passing. The great NFL teams always have a good running game and if not your going to get your franchise QB killed.

All Auburn is changing is to get a more 60-40 balance on run/pass, and at times pass more on early downs, and not when it is just a long distance down. And to bring a more diverse passing attack.

They are NOT trying to abandon Gus's strong running credentials..
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29651 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:

NFL and college are totally different. I still do not know why we are so obsessed with trying to throw the ball more. I understand having the threat and using it on play action or getting the defense on their heals but our offense with Gus at the controls revolves around running the ball 70% of the time.



I think SEC DC's have figured out Gus' O. We must be able to throw the ball better to keep teams from loading up the box on us. I have a friend who is a HS coach and huge Auburn fan. He told me that their HS passing tree is a lot more sophisticated than ours.
Posted by metafour
Member since Feb 2007
4356 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I understand having the threat and using it on play action or getting the defense on their heals but our offense with Gus at the controls revolves around running the ball 70% of the time.


Running 70% of the time is too much, and what your are glossing over is the fact that this strategy has only worked for Gus when he has had the perfect personnel storm...ie: an elite running QB (Cam, Marshall) , running back(s) (Dyer, Mason, etc) , blocking FB (Prosch), and OL (Greg Robinson).

When you don't have that perfect mix of players, you are left holding your dick with an offense that can't just run over everybody yet doesn't possess the ability to actually throw the ball because the system doesn't have the players or plays to switch modes. Malzahn's pass offense has deteriorated because he has been spoiled by those seasons wherein the run game has been so unstoppable that he could just get away with a passing offense that revolves around a few deep routes and screens. The shite doesn't work when the defense can stop your run game at a decent rate.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Idk if you noticed but it's not working anymore.


Its more personnel than scheme. We do not have a SEC Caliber QB
out there who can sell the run and the pass. It has nothing to do with
the defenses. Just the fact that we are not doing what we have done that
worked. We do not have the right people. Everybody could see it

Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
23960 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:28 am to
I read your post like a poem with the way it posted.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I think SEC DC's have figured out Gus' O.


I dont believe that. We just dont have the people in place to run it effectively. We need a QB and HB and we will pretty much be there.

I totally understand the fact we need a passing game and why. No doubt. But to try and add some kind of "Air Raid" element to what we do sounds counter productive.

Surely finding a QB to do what we need can not be any harder than revamping the offense.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69456 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I read your post like a poem with the way it posted.


I have no idea why it looks like that.
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 58Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter