Started By
Message

re: Coaching Search Thread

Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:19 am to
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
8747 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:19 am to
quote:

That ship sailed when we started blaming interim coaches for the program's problems.



"The games have to mean something"

(Unless your buyout is $30mil, then you get multiple years before the games mean something, like a normal coach.)
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
64643 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 7:56 am to
Posted by Feral
Member since Mar 2012
12680 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

The one area on the team I'd feel good about talent-wise was the O-line. The rest needs to be revamped.


I’m supportive of the Silverfield hire, but I’m not happy with his moves at OL coach and not retaining Mateos.

Offensive line was arguably the strength of the team last year.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14675 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:46 am to
quote:

The portal has shown us there’s no need to wait and see. If he’s not winning in the fist 2 seasons he needs to go. We’ve got plenty of evidence to show that with the portal coaches should be able to be competitive immediately. 6 win minimum next year should be the standard.


This program is doomed. Why couldn’t I have been a fan of a college that brought enjoyment and accolades, like Alabama or LSU?
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18176 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:53 am to
It’s only doomed because we continue to make shite hires. It’s not hard to go out and hire a winner. They tend to win. Like yeah it’s always some what of a crap shoot, but if you’ll just hire people based on whether they win or not, you’ll tend to have more success than not. Especially when you start to look at things like do they win against superior talent? Do they win without top resources? If they check those boxes it’s even easier. Hiring a football coach isn’t rocket science. But we have dumb fricks on the hill ( Hunter) who are inept at making a coaching hire.
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8924 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

That ship sailed when we started blaming interim coaches for the program's problems.


Let’s go back to the true problem, Yuracheck.
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8924 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

This program is doomed. Why couldn’t I have been a fan of a college that brought enjoyment and accolades, like Alabama or LSU?


One program was irrelevant until a coach got there that knew how to work its magic and knew what kind of players to get and set up a system that 2 of the next 3 coaches used to get players and win championships.

The other was saved from a death spiral by the same coach.

All this goes back to the thread I made months ago. What kind of program are we? What is our identity?
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 9:44 am
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19360 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:02 am to
quote:

One program was irrelevant until a coach got there that knew how to work its magic and knew what kind of players to get and set up a system that 2 of the next 3 coaches used to get players and win championships.

The other was saved from a death spiral by the same coach.

All this goes back to the thread I made months ago. What kind of program are we? What is our identity?
The reality is hard to ignore: we’ve become an administratively incompetent program that’s lowered the bar so far, bowl eligibility is treated like a win—even as the bowl system itself is fading.

There’s no strategic fundraising, no understanding of how to identify or support the right coach, and absolutely no charisma in the brand.

We don’t know how to generate national attention unless it’s through embarrassment.

And when it comes to pitching big donors? There’s no vision, no story, no leadership that inspires confidence.

This isn’t just about football—it’s about identity. Programs that win consistently know who they are. They have a culture, a system, and leadership that understands how to build and sustain success. We don’t. We’re stuck in a cycle of reactive decisions, short-term fixes, and lowered expectations.

Until the people at the top commit to real change—starting with defining who we are and what we stand for—we’ll keep drifting. The blueprint exists. Other programs have followed it. But it takes courage, clarity, and competence to execute it.
Posted by Rzrbackguy
Apalachicola, FL
Member since Jul 2014
2537 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Until the people at the top change


Fixed your typo. Otherwise a solid post!
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
20398 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

And when it comes to pitching big donors? There’s no vision, no story, no leadership that inspires confidence.


This is the biggest problem.

The minute NIL without restrictions hit HY should have been in every big money donors office saying lets go win a Natty in football. It's a free for all.

Instead he doubled down on Titman and played a victim complaining about the system and how it wasn't right.

Joey freakin McGuire who could barely break .500 in his previous 3 years at Tech is in the playoff because boosters paid to get them there.

Thanks HY

This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 12:44 pm
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8924 posts
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Fixed your typo. Otherwise a solid post!


I think the problem is everyone not in the Athletic Department sees the sports as taking away from the school, instead of a great team increasing the enrollment of the classes leading to the funding of their departments.
Jump to page
Page First 159 160 161
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 161 of 161Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter