Started By
Message
re: Arkansas Football 2024 Recruiting Thread **WR Zachary Taylor Commits**
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:08 am to Jack Ruby
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:08 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Hell, their appointed NIL VP at UofA left and went to Miss State b/c their program is better. What does that say?
Is this true? Where had you seen this? Wow. Hunter seems to be a very good AD overall, why isn't he more involved in getting this started better?
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:12 am to Razorback Reverend
Allegedly, he doesn’t agree with it and wants to stay above the shadiness of it. Who knows if that’s true or just message board rumors.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:38 am to TheCheshireHog
LINK
This was from June before the August guest editorial.
LINK
LINK
Terry left for Miss State two weeks after Yurachek's comments.
This was from June before the August guest editorial.
LINK
quote:
OPINION | Guest writer
OPINION | HUNTER YURACHEK: Save college sports
Enact national NIL policy by Hunter Yurachek Special to the Democrat-Gazette | August 12, 2023 at 3:00 a.m.
quote:
It doesn't take intimate knowledge of the current landscape of college sports to see the impact name, image, and likeness (NIL) is having in every conference and with every school. In recent years, it has become the proverbial elephant in the room when discussing college athletics.
NIL arrived at the doorstep of college sports without the proper guardrails in place to navigate this new frontier.
As a result, states were forced to enact their own laws that created a landscape that is disjointed, unbalanced, and lacks clear oversight or supervision from a national policy and body.
But Congress has the power to rectify the imbalance in state laws and create a uniform system that not only works for everyone, but secures the future of college athletics for thousands of current and future athletes in non-revenue generating sports.
While college athletes benefiting from their name, image, and likeness has been widely accepted as a net positive for the athletes, what is on the horizon, thanks to California, puts the entire system at risk and threatens the viability of every non-revenue collegiate sport. This means women's and Olympic sports are facing an existential threat, and the athletes competing in these sports might lose the opportunity to compete and pursue their dreams.
On June 30, 2021, the NCAA approved a name, image, and likeness policy that effectively instructs that state laws in each individual state prevail, and for states where NIL laws have yet to be enacted, it is up to the individual institutions to put guidelines in place.
Unfortunately, the current state of affairs appears to be just the tip of the iceberg. California seems poised to again potentially be the catalyst for massive change. Legislation introduced this year in California proposes a revenue-sharing model for college athletics that will result in a complete and total upheaval of the system.
This bill would require schools to share 50 percent of the revenue a sport generates with athletes of that sport after subtracting the cost of scholarships. Yet it is that very revenue that supports the non-revenue-generating sports at these schools.
If you are a fan of college athletics this potential new model could place women's and Olympic college sports in serious jeopardy.
As it currently stands, players are able to benefit off their own name, image, and likeness through endorsement deals, sponsorships, and other mechanisms. This has given athletes the power to build personal brands and take advantage of those brands. We've seen athletes use name, image, and likeness to help support family members, raise money for charity, fund graduate programs after their playing days, or make extra money to spend, save, or invest.
However, a patchwork set of name, image, and likeness laws across various states, as well as some states with no laws regulating NIL whatsoever, has left the system in desperate need of a standard set of guidelines. Unfortunately, the NCAA is hamstrung by many of the state laws regulating NIL, which leaves Congress as the sole vehicle to act.
W ithout congressional action to help create a nationwide standard that can be applied to all schools and conferences, the result will be more states like California taking legislative action, each one seeking to go one step further than the last. As we're seeing with the proposed legislation in California, this is wholly unsustainable for the future of college athletics as we know it.
A revenue-sharing model that forces sports programs generating meaningful revenue to share nearly half the revenue that the program generates with the athletes of the team would collapse the entire system. This fails to appreciate the extent to which revenue-generating sports--primarily football and men's basketball--are used to fund entire athletic programs.
If this passes, other states are sure to follow. As we know, college athletics can be the lifeblood of many college campuses, and fandom runs deep. No state, particularly those with prominent college athletic programs, will want to feel like they are being left behind. This will only further tip the scales of what is already an uneven playing field.
Through congressional action, we can help mitigate these potential problems. A national, consistent policy would not only be a solution to the fragmented NIL system in place today, it would also create a system that works for everyone--particularly the athletes--while simultaneously protecting the future of a college athletics system that provides more opportunity in higher education for scholarships than anything outside the GI Bill.
Absent Congress stepping in, it is only a matter of time before we see opportunities for female and Olympic sports athletes wash away. If there is any chance of maintaining the collegiate athletic ecosystem that has become synonymous with the college experience not only for the athletes, but for students, fans, staff, and communities nationwide, a national framework provided through congressional action is our best hope.
Hunter Yurachek is the director of athletics at the University of Arkansas.
LINK
Terry left for Miss State two weeks after Yurachek's comments.
quote:
Terry Prentice, who served as the University of Arkansas athletic director for branding and inclusion, has left the post to become deputy athletic director at Mississippi State.
Prentice had been in that role with the Razorbacks since 2021. That was about the time schools across the country began to tackle Name, Image, Likeness activities. Prentice was, in a manner, Arkansas’ NIL lead in the athletic department.
Before arriving at Arkansas in 2021, Prentice held the diversity and inclusion AD position at Kansas. He also worked with the Razorbacks Foundation from 2014-18 after graduating from Arkansas in 2012.
Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek authored an editorial in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette earlier in August that wished for the United States’ Congress make changes to the NIL, specifically calling for regulation of it.
In that vein, a larger spotlight than usual exists on Prentice’s replacement.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:42 am to RazorHawg
June Athletic article.
LINK
LINK
quote:
Nick Saban, Greg Sankey and a host of other dignitaries from the Southeastern Conference are in Washington, D.C., this week to convince legislators to address what is undeniably one of the most pressing crises in our country right now: NIL collectives.
It’s not that college commissioners, athletic directors and coaches are against athletes finally earning money for their name, image and likeness. It’s that in many cases they’re being paid too much money, and that sometimes the money is not being used as it was intended, and it’s not being regulated, so man, do we have ourselves some problems.
Arkansas AD Hunter Yurachek, a member of the aforementioned D.C. convoy, explained one of those problems at a Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce event this week.
“Young men and women are making decisions not to go to Major League Baseball or the WNBA or the NBA because they can make more money in college,” Yurachek said, according to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. “Does that make any sense, that you can make more money by staying in college than you can by going and being a professional athlete? That’s where we have some issues in college athletics.”
Upon reading this, you may be asking yourself: Wait, isn’t it a good thing for college athletics if the star athletes want to stay in college longer?
Of course it is.
Well, then why would the athletic director of a major Power 5 athletic program say something so … well, for lack of a better word, asinine?
Yurachek is no dummy. In fact, he’s a highly regarded athletic director. It’s just that he, like most of his colleagues, has been working inside the college athletics industrial complex for decades. So he, like most of his colleagues, would have you believe something that most rational people outside that sphere would find fairly ludicrous:
The notion that revenue-generating college sports are not a professional sport.
Maybe you could have made that argument in some earlier era when the coaches were making $25,000 a year and the players were doing it solely for the love of the game. (Though there have been famous scandals dating back as far as the late 1800s about college players receiving payments in violation of amateurism principles.)
But Yurachek works in a conference that earned $721.8 million in revenue in 2021-22 and starting next year will earn another $300 million a year from ESPN for the rights to one (1) football game a week (the current “SEC on CBS” package). Last year, his athletic department paid head football coach Sam Pittman $6 million a year, and even that ranked in the lower half of his own conference.
Meanwhile, just last week at a resort near Destin, Fla., Yurachek and his counterparts opted to remain at eight conference games instead of nine next season despite the league expanding to 16 schools with Oklahoma and Texas. The main reason? Because they want ESPN to throw even more money their way in exchange for improving the quality of a TV property for which the network already holds the rights.
This. Is. Professional. Sports.
And once you accept that premise, then it absolutely does make sense that some athletes might realize more NIL value in college than they would in the NFL. Not Caleb Williams, the USC quarterback who could sign a contract in excess of $40 million guaranteed next year if he indeed becomes a No. 1 draft pick, or Arkansas’ own point guard Anthony Black, a projected top-10 pick in this month’s draft. The 10th pick in the NBA Draft gets more than $8 million over his first two seasons.
But what if you’re current Razorback quarterback K.J. Jefferson? In January, shortly after the underclassman NFL Draft deadline passed, the collective ONEArkansas announced on Twitter it had “re-signed” the fifth-year senior. The terms of NIL deals are rarely made public, but it’s no stretch to suggest the star quarterback for an SEC program could fetch seven figures in NIL money. Which, yes, is more than he would have made if he had turned pro after last season and gone in the fourth round or lower.
Yurachek is apparently under the impression that the economics here don’t make sense, but they absolutely do. Surely he’d agree that Jefferson brings considerable value to the Arkansas football program, helping drive ticket sales and donations as well as potential exposure if the Razorbacks knock off Alabama or reach a major bowl in 2023.
Whereas Jefferson’s monetary value to, say, the New England Patriots, were he to spend this season wearing a baseball cap on the sideline, would be … non-existent.
It’s also rich that Yurachek brings up the WNBA, where the rookie salary for the No. 1 pick is a whopping $74,305. Iowa’s Caitlin Clark may make more than that figure just to conduct a dozen autograph signings. LSU’s Angel Reese may make more than that selling merchandise on her own website. Both might make even more once they reach the WNBA, likely in 2024, and add salaries on top of their endorsement deals, but their ability to capitalize on their contribution to the popularity of women’s college hoops is the absolute opposite of a crisis.
That’s not to say there aren’t legitimate issues in the college NIL space. There has been no shortage of stories about bad actors taking advantage of athletes, in particular recruits, whose families aren’t necessarily savvy about collectives and marketing contracts. Coaches like Saban are more offended that collectives are using NIL money as a tool to lure recruits. One might argue that’s actually a more efficient recruiting tool than raising hundreds of millions to build a lavish football facility that exists for the sole purpose of impressing 17-year-olds on a visit — but that’s at least up for debate.
But it’s hard to argue that this statement Wednesday by former coach and current Senator Tommy Tuberville is anything other than ludicrous:
“Today we are meeting with coaches, athletic directors and administrators from several different conferences here in Washington, D.C., talking about the disastrous new NIL rules. And they are a disaster.”
Despite years of fear-mongering by the powers that be in college sports, these supposed “disastrous” consequences have yet to show their face. College football’s television ratings last season were excellent. Women’s athletes with big social media followings are thriving.
And yes, star football players like Washington’s Michael Penix Jr. and Oregon’s Bo Nix along with Kansas basketball star Hunter Dickinson are returning to entertain college fans for another year. Makes sense.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:08 am to RazorHawg
Deputy AD would be a promotion though, no? Hard to blame him if that’s the case regardless
Posted on 11/5/23 at 12:34 am to RazorHawg
Ohh boy, HY is desiring to be the poster child against NIL....
Not a great look overall. I agree changes need made with recruiting. It was never intended to be used as a recruiting tool to get the kids to campus, but it is exactly what is happening now. Crazy times indeed.
So, again... 25bucks a month x 250000 fans... A Lotta Nil change.
Not a great look overall. I agree changes need made with recruiting. It was never intended to be used as a recruiting tool to get the kids to campus, but it is exactly what is happening now. Crazy times indeed.
So, again... 25bucks a month x 250000 fans... A Lotta Nil change.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:20 am to Razorback Reverend
quote:
Arkansas AD Hunter Yurachek, a member of the aforementioned D.C. convoy, explained one of those problems at a Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce event this week.
“Young men and women are making decisions not to go to Major League Baseball or the WNBA or the NBA because they can make more money in college,” Yurachek said, according to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. “Does that make any sense, that you can make more money by staying in college than you can by going and being a professional athlete? That’s where we have some issues in college athletics.”
This entire quote is just absolutely insane to me, especially coming from an AD at a major program who gets his arse kicked in football every year.
HY's sentiments are the EXACT OPPOSITE of the Supreme Court's absolute takedown to the NCAA in their 9-0 ruling. Basically, who gives a shite if a college kid can make that much money? He's an adult and if people are willing to pay him, then that's the free market.
Its also even crazier that the SEC is about to double its TV rights revenue and hunter and the BoT still act like a little dick program when it comes to $$.
Will that added TV rvenue not offset any kind of losses they'd get from boosters giving cash to players instead of directly to their stupid foundation?
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:30 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
HY's sentiments are the EXACT OPPOSITE of the Supreme Court's absolute takedown to the NCAA in their 9-0 ruling. Basically, who gives a shite if a college kid can make that much money? He's an adult and if people are willing to pay him, then that's the free market.
HY sounding like Cartman trying to sign crack baby basketball players....
Kj is doing the work to pay hunter's check.....he's the one sacrificing not hunter. Who benefits from one of the cushiest highest paying state jobs out there..... Kj made Kjs value and increased our programs value. Why shouldn't he be able to profit off his own name?
Posted on 11/6/23 at 9:44 am to Jack Ruby
Latest is Crutchfield to Mizzou on multiple crystal ball picks including Wiltfong.
DL Charleston Collins got a recent flip prediction to Ole Miss by Spiegelman on On3.
DL Charleston Collins got a recent flip prediction to Ole Miss by Spiegelman on On3.
Posted on 11/6/23 at 12:10 pm to RazorHawg
frick me. The gift from Enos keeps on giving.
Posted on 11/6/23 at 12:38 pm to RazorHawg
quote:
Latest is Crutchfield to Mizzou on multiple crystal ball picks including Wiltfong.
DL Charleston Collins got a recent flip prediction to Ole Miss by Spiegelman on On3.
Sam supporters get in here.
Posted on 11/6/23 at 12:46 pm to oklahogjr
You are fooling yourself. Most of these kids are making money based solely on the helmet they put on. They are beneficiaries of institutions that have fostered alumni relationships for decades.
It’s embarrassing to even suggest KJ has done more for the university than HY
It’s embarrassing to even suggest KJ has done more for the university than HY
Posted on 11/6/23 at 1:01 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Do we blame Sam or NIL
Posted on 11/6/23 at 1:10 pm to hawgfaninc
Everything comes down to money.
Always.
Always.
Posted on 11/6/23 at 1:11 pm to WonderWartHawg
Especially these days when you hear “doing what’s best to take care of me and my family”
Posted on 11/6/23 at 1:13 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Sam or NIL
Sam, duh... Because everyone want someone to blame... Must have our pound of flesh! It's the American way man!
Posted on 11/6/23 at 1:15 pm to hawgfaninc
Sam's uncertainty and on the field performance lead to lack of NIL for the program.
Muss and DVH both get NIL support but nothing helps more than winning and success against opponents.
If only Arkansas could put together sustained consistency in football for a few years beating the middle table and bottom teams.
Muss and DVH both get NIL support but nothing helps more than winning and success against opponents.
If only Arkansas could put together sustained consistency in football for a few years beating the middle table and bottom teams.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:31 pm to RazorHawg
quote:Hiring a quality coach would do wonders for NIL inflow and our W|L column.
Sam's uncertainty and on the field performance lead to lack of NIL for the program
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top



1







