Started By
Message

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13824 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:11 pm to
I’m confused? You stanning UAB? You some sidewalk fan?
Posted by Fleurs
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2016
1422 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:12 pm to
if thinking it's pitiful you guys are still on about this amounts to "stanning" (sic), sure.

the good news is that it was extremely unpopular, both locally and nationally, when the ua power brokers tried this before, so much like the new ua president trying to take the med school from uab, you do not have to worry at all about them trying again any time soon. uab has a football team now and thats that. there is zero percent chance it changes any time soon. (goes for both.)
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 6:15 pm
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13824 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:23 pm to
I think UAB having a football program in FBS is a wasteful expense only made more ridiculous every advancing year of NILball. It is an indulgence given to the City of Birmingham to justify their persistent sports venue ambitions that resulted in not even being able to keep a spring ball league and some 6-6 v. 5-7 type ESPN bowl.

I think the spin off of UAB into its own institution made a lot more sense before the internet. The largest city in the state did not have a public 4-year institution. For those who could not afford - either due to job commitments or money - to commute to Tuscaloosa, were underserved by the state higher education system.

However, that justification makes less sense today given remote learning being common even for those attending UA. It is a better overall arrangement for the prestige of the flagship university - which will have material impact on the quality of faculty and student it can attract - for the flagship to have all the schools a major state flagship university ought to have.

The current arrangement cheapens both and the only real expense is some faculty and administrators would be redundant. Though truthfully, I bet the redundancy would mostly be in administrators because you're not a modern university without faculty shortfalls.
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 6:24 pm
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
2582 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:44 pm to
On top of that auburn just giggles in glee to see UAB have any success. I personally think they pushed to get the football program reinstated when it was shut down.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13824 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:55 pm to
Auburn has nothing to do with UAB existing as a standalone campus best I can tell. However they totally outmaneuvered UA for the land grant in the 19th century despite having far fewer notable alumni at the time.
Posted by PuertoRicanBlaze
Book Board Admin
Member since Apr 2024
7807 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

On top of that auburn just giggles in glee to see UAB have any success. I personally think they pushed to get the football program reinstated when it was shut down.


Nobody clutched their pearls harder than boomer Auburn fans when UAB shut its football program down. It was genuinely the most embarrassing yet hilarious displays of fake outrage I'd ever seen. They were more devastated than the nine UAB fans were (eight if we're counting a pregnant UAB fan as one).

But ask those same Auburn boomers why they don't channel all that energy into helping AUM build a football program and, "NO, THAT'S DIFFERENT!!!!1"
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter