Started By
Message
re: Tide Hoops | Please Anchor
Posted on 12/6/21 at 8:58 am to mistaken4193
Posted on 12/6/21 at 8:58 am to mistaken4193
quote:
Iona is 60 in NET...So with our resume how the frick are we #15?
Yea, don't quite get it.
Oh well, whatever
Posted on 12/6/21 at 8:58 am to mistaken4193
Oh wow that’s higher than I thought… hmm I’m not sure. It will take care of itself if we beat Houston and Memphis. Also Colorado State is undefeated so far.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:00 am to mistaken4193
We currently have wins over
#8
#47
#68
#80
#87
#96
#123
Loss to #60
HOW TF ARE WE #15?
#8
#47
#68
#80
#87
#96
#123
Loss to #60
HOW TF ARE WE #15?
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 9:02 am
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:01 am to SummerOfGeorge
NET Rankings of OOC Schedule (#1 America)
#8 Gonzaga (W)
#47 Oakland (W)
#60 Iona (L)
#68 South Alabama (W)
#80 South Dakota St (W)
#87 Drake (W)
#98 Louisiana Tech (W)
#123 Miami (W)
#4 Houston
#6 Baylor
#27 Colorado State
#65 Memphis
#205 Jacksonville State
#8 Gonzaga (W)
#47 Oakland (W)
#60 Iona (L)
#68 South Alabama (W)
#80 South Dakota St (W)
#87 Drake (W)
#98 Louisiana Tech (W)
#123 Miami (W)
#4 Houston
#6 Baylor
#27 Colorado State
#65 Memphis
#205 Jacksonville State
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 9:02 am
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:05 am to SummerOfGeorge
So we're 6-1 in Q1/2 games against the toughest SOS in the country and that translates to 15th? This really makes me question NET to be honest.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:14 am to Robot Santa
George it’s time to run the real numbers
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:19 am to Crimsonite94
quote:
George it’s time to run the real numbers
I ain't got that in basketball
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:26 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Big takeaway from the NET ranking has to be that both the SEC and Big 12 have 9 teams in the Top-75 of the NET. That number is significant because most every road game in those leagues will be a quadrant one game.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:29 am to Chadaristic
quote:
Starting this season, the metric will slim down to just two components, rather than the previous five. The two remaining components are an adjusted net efficiency rating and the Team Value Index (TVI), which is a result-based feature that rewards teams for beating quality opponents, particularly away from home. Win percentage, adjusted win percentage and scoring margin are no longer used in the NET rankings.
This is why the NET rankings look a little different than expected.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 9:32 am
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:31 am to Chadaristic
quote:
adjusted net efficiency rating
KenPom - #9
Torvik - #8
Torvik (no-preseason info) - #9
ESPN BPI - #18
So maybe they just used BPI
quote:
Team Value Index (TVI)
ESPN SOR - #12
Torvik WAB - #3
ELO - #5
quote:
which is a result-based feature that rewards teams for beating quality opponents, particularly away from home
We arguably have the best one of these in the entire country to this point.
Yea, it doesn't really matter right now, but I'm pretty confused
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 9:33 am
Posted on 12/6/21 at 9:44 am to SummerOfGeorge
Yeah, it still seems a bit wonky, but it's early. Just win, baby.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 11:24 am to TideCPA
quote:
Wouldn't miss it. Will need a Red Bull for the drive home though.
That's brave to drive back afterwards. Definitely getting a room for the night so I can enjoy Houndstooth for a bit after the game.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 11:31 am to McGregor
Gonzaga loses 2 of 3 and plays a clunker against Tarleton State (who??) and only drops 2 spots. Wow.
I didn’t expect them to drop out of the rankings or anything, but from what I’ve seen, they’re talented but vulnerable this year.
I didn’t expect them to drop out of the rankings or anything, but from what I’ve seen, they’re talented but vulnerable this year.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 11:42 am to CaptainMorgan
quote:
I didn’t expect them to drop out of the rankings or anything, but from what I’ve seen, they’re talented but vulnerable this year.
They just need to figure out their rotations from what I saw. The talent is definitely there. I don't think Few knows how to use Holmgren just yet either, which is causing them some issues because I'm not sure he and Timme belong on the floor together. On offense it's fine because Holmgren can play like a wing, but defensively it limits them on the perimeter which is something we took huge advantage of.
Posted on 12/6/21 at 11:50 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
ESPN BPI - #18
BPI lowballs us every year relative to the other ratings. The memory is burned into my brain after years of bubble riding. It might be that way across the board for the SEC but Im not sure
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 11:54 am
Posted on 12/6/21 at 11:58 am to Glorious
quote:
BPI lowballs us every year relative to the other ratings. The memory is burned into my brain after years of bubble riding. It might be that way across the board for the SEC but Im not sure
Damn right they do
Posted on 12/6/21 at 12:06 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Alabama Athletics@UA_Athletics·3m
Blue Collar Mentality. Let’s go to work!
First 500 UA students will receive a hard hat this Saturday! Be there early!
#RollTide
Posted on 12/6/21 at 12:40 pm to Chadaristic
quote:
Starting this season, the metric will slim down to just two components, rather than the previous five. The two remaining components are an adjusted net efficiency rating and the Team Value Index (TVI), which is a result-based feature that rewards teams for beating quality opponents, particularly away from home. Win percentage, adjusted win percentage and scoring margin are no longer used in the NET rankings.
The thing that is really screwing us in NET is that Gonzaga was technically a neural site game. Not a road game.
Seattle is 280 miles from Spokane and still in-state for Gonzaga.
It's 2,500 miles from Tuscaloosa.
We all know it was actually a road game. But alas, it was "neutral" as far as NET, BPI, KenPom, etc. go.
This post was edited on 12/6/21 at 12:41 pm
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top



1






