Started By
Message

re: PSA regarding this months-long Golding debacle

Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
43124 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:10 pm to
I sort of regret advocating for your reinstatement to this board when you asked for people to do so on WoollyAL, not because I want you gone, but because you've become "abrasive" in your stances. I think that is what rubs us the wrong way. I believe you're smart and a person of good character, but I feel you are also contributing to the board being bogged down.
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 1:18 pm
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I feel you are also contributing to the board being bogged down.


Constructive criticism noted and I will endeavor not to do that in the future.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
43124 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Constructive criticism noted and I will endeavor not to do that in the future.

And look, I believe I owe you an apology if I came across as attacking your character (particularly in my post on WoollyAL). So if I came across as doing this, I am sorry. As stated above, I think you are a person of good character from what I've seen, I think you are smart, and I think you love Alabama football just like the rest of us. I just feel like your posting style lately sort of has an abrasiveness to it that can rub people the wrong way.
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 1:25 pm
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13349 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:27 pm to
We have used the mush rush as a means of rushing the passer when facing a mobile QB. While I see the reasoning for it (occasionally in my book), I don’t see it being effective too often especially when you have speed at LB(not this year) and DL capable of getting to the QB. JMO
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:36 pm to
The "mush rush" is not about rushing the passer. It's a method of playing the run by moving upfield, keeping the Olineman at arms length and controlling him, and playing both physical sides of the Olineman in the run game. It is not and never has been a pass rushing technique, although it has benefits in that regard.
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13349 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:40 pm to
Going to have to disagree there . It is to force the QB to stay in the pocket often with a spy on him as well

It was designed for mobile QBs . It was given that name by John Mitchell I think but Saban has alluded to this many times when facing mobile , elusive QBs
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 2:44 pm
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

It is to force the QB to stay in the pocket often with a spy on him as well


I don't disagree that it has this secondary benefit, but the "mush rush" is not a pass rushing technique at all and should not be called that. It's a technique to play the run, and the QB is certainly a runner.
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:46 pm to
I think we are violently agreeing. I am calling any "pass rush" technique a scheme to attack the QB who is in the process of throwing or wanting to throw the football.

I am saying that the "mush rush" by definition is not a scheme to get to the QB who is passing, but a scheme to play the run, and the QB is certainly a runner. It also has the added benefit of uniformly collapsing the pocket around the QB.

This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 2:48 pm
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13349 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:49 pm to
I can go along with that

Put me in the corner of not liking it though . When the QB picks us apart in that D, it makes me say ugly things
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:50 pm to
My point in the original example was to illustrate that any poster why was screaming about the mush rush being a bad way to get to the QB quickly has no idea what they are talking about, as it's not a plan to do that at all by design. It's a plan to have overlapping gap responsibility for the front 7 in the run game while having the benefit of collapsing the pocket around any QB, including a running one.
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Put me in the corner of not liking it though . When the QB picks us apart in that D, it makes me say ugly things


I hear you, but it's responsible for us knocking down a silly amount of balls a number of years back. And we've stopped the run with it effectively, even after going away from monster NTs, as the 2-gap technique eliminates the necessity of the NT demanding a double team. When done right, it works.

I did hear a DC talk on a podcast a few weeks back that the 2-gap is quickly becoming a thing of the past, and so I'm interested to see if that is true for Alabama. (Edit: it wasn't a DC, it was the new head coach for Arkansas in his first presser - Sam Pittman).

Honestly, how many teams on our schedule really want to run the football anymore? 3?
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13349 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 3:02 pm to
My point is it was used by us primarily on passing downs so the run gap fits really didn’t apply. Having been a HS OC fir 16 years and a DC for 6, I know about Schemes . Adding to your point , I hope we do get away from it. I have always felt teams use that against us in recruiting DL
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

My point is it was used by us primarily on passing downs so the run gap fits really didn’t apply.


I disagree in 2 ways:

1) We used this technique on traditional downs, when the chance of run or pass was equal. It only looked like a "mush rush" when the offense decided to pass. When they ran, it looked like we played "normal" run defense.

When it was an obvious passing down, we frequently put in our rabbit rusher package and pinned our ears back, abandoning 2-gap completely.

2) Even if we run this technique on obvious passing downs, each and every Dlineman is scanning both sides of his man for a ballcarrier and not trying to get upfield at the expense of losing 2-gap responsibility, and so he is most definitely playing the run. The QB being the runner changes nothing.

And so my point remains, the "mush rush" at no point in time was a means to pressure a passing QB quickly, but rather a way to play all types of run game, QB included, while collapsing the pocket around the QB. And so any poster insulting the DC or player for not getting upfield faster in pursuit of a sack has no idea what they are talking about. It is a controlled upfield push playing run first, pass second - with every dlineman maintaining 2-gap responsibility.
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 3:41 pm
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 3:28 pm to
Also, Bear, I have really enjoyed our discussion. Many thanks.
Posted by Cobrasize
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2013
49682 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 3:34 pm to
Bear is a good guy and knows his stuff
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 3:36 pm to
Bear, you seem to know your stuff. If you want us to go away from 2-gap, and we obviously can't go back to having 360lb NTs, what scheme is your preference for what we do out of the 3-4 in the future. I'm thinking of doing a deep dive into the different options, but would enjoy getting your take in advance.
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13349 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 4:06 pm to
I am fixing to catch a plane to Vegas for 5 day stay so can’t get into much but love talking X’s and O’s. Still a baseball coach ( gave up football last year) and AD nearing retirement and trying to give up baseball too in a short version which I will get back later , I hope we implement some elements of the 3-3 stack. Very versatile D
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 6:43 pm
Posted by MrMojoRisin
Udûn
Member since May 2014
7049 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 6:26 pm to
You must have angered some people or have a stalker. I noticed every post you make in this thread gets downvoted at least twice, no matter what you say.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 6:34 pm to
There appears to be only a couple of posters willing to upvote any of his posts, but it's a situation he's caused himself. I actually upvoted one recently -- prevatt33b's best post ever, imo.
This post was edited on 3/7/20 at 7:13 pm
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

gets downvoted at least twice, no matter what you say.


Yes, it's been that way for a few years. I call those people my "fans". I've tried to tell them that I literally couldn't care less about up- or downvotes and every second they waste doing it is a second of their life they won't get back, but they're dedicated. I'm actually quite honored in the end, that I'm always in the forefront of their mind at all times.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter