Started By
Message

re: Official Fall Camp Discussion Thread - Who Wants to Wear Out That Trojan arse?

Posted on 8/19/16 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24297 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Oh, for frick's sake
Posted by stomp
Bama
Member since Nov 2014
3771 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

correlation does not imply causation


It doesn't, but the trend does exist.

It'll be interesting to see who the team responds to
Posted by Bamafan4evr12
Member since Jul 2014
2299 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:04 pm to
i wonder if the kids coming up behind Bateman are starting to get to him some, and he's thinking too much rather than just playing. I mean he struggles with deep throws sure but the others he's not bad. I'm just wondering if he's thinking too much
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18206 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:13 pm to
well he sure wouldnt be the first player to get scared of the competition this summer.
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11868 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:15 pm to
If we're playing with last year's offense, I agree, Bateman starts the season and we stay conservative and feed King Henry about 34 times and walk out of Dallas with a W, albeit an unimpressive one.
If we do that this year, we're taking a much larger gamble. Unproven RBs running behind an OL with a new center, new right tackle and very little experience together and a green QB to boot. And with Cooper's scouting report,if you're SC, you load the box and take your chances over the top with your corners on an island.
This post was edited on 8/19/16 at 8:17 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

If we do that this year, we're taking a much larger gamble.


I disagree. With our Oline being monsters who need to gel, running downhill should be what they're best at early in the season. Concordantly, USC's biggest weakness is their Dline (and maybe front 7 as a whole). Our gameplan should be to run it.

All. Day. Long.

Seriously, USC's Dline should be the worst unit we see all year amongst our Power5 foes. We should throw only to keep them from seriously stacking the box, and that ain't much. As a matter of fact, of all of our neutral site openers under Saban, this is the game where being run-heavy is the lowest gamble.
This post was edited on 8/19/16 at 8:25 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:27 pm to
Actually, I expect our gameplan to be frustratingly boring against USC. And very effective.
This post was edited on 8/19/16 at 8:27 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

And with Cooper's scouting report,if you're SC, you load the box and take your chances over the top with your corners on an island.


I don't care if Brandon Avalos is the QB: stacking the box as your default gameplan to stop Kiffin and this group of WRs is just stupid.
Posted by Cobrasize
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2013
49884 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:30 pm to
I expect a lot of read option no matter who is back there. The left side of our OLine is just nasty.
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11868 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:31 pm to
Pre att, if that's true about USCs DL, then Bateman gets the start no matter how good or bad he looks tomorrow and the other two guys are just playing for #2. We can't go through our whole schedule successfully with that strategy though.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

And with Cooper's scouting report


This drives me nuts. Why do so many fans think that the only way to prevent a D from "stacking the box" is to throw deep balls? You know what prevents a team from stacking the box? A 13-yard curl. A 10-yard out. Slants. A 15-yard cross. A TE drag.

All of these routes Bateman is very accurate on. His only knock is the DEEP ball. Deep balls only take the top off the D and back up the safeties. Short routes thrown accurately prevent stacking the box very effectively.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 8:39 pm to
I agree that Bateman probably starts against USC. I also believe we'll be run-heavy (by our standards). And no, we cannot beat other teams with this strategy.

However, when has Saban showed his offensive hand before the start of SEC play? We're always super boring and conservative in openers. It's a great tactic if you can get the W doing so.

And, yes, USC's Dline is atrociously bad. Simply put, it was their weakest unit BY FAR going into Spring ball with respect to both playmakers as well as depth. And then they were DECIMATED by injuries.

We should have 400 yards rushing in this game.
This post was edited on 8/19/16 at 8:40 pm
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
90031 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:21 pm to
Conservative, run heavy offense....sounds like a great opportunity to get Hurts' feet wet
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16161 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Pre att, if that's true about USCs DL, then Bateman gets the start no matter how good or bad he looks tomorrow and the other two guys are just playing for #2.


The more I think about it, the more I disagree.

If you think you can beat them by lining up and just blowing them off the ball, that is the perfect time to start a young QB. The pressure won't be on him and you can bring him up slowly all the while building his confidence.

Of course, I'm still waiting on Nick to ask me my thoughts on the matter so I'm not certain that my opinion matters too much......
Posted by MrTide33
Member since Nov 2012
4358 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Nobody should be hoping a Bama player stinks it up. I'm hoping they all have great days but someone - and I don't care who - just shows themselves to have that extra little something that elevates them from good to great.


I think that the sentiment comes across differently than it is intended. I think everybody wants all three QBs to be great, but I think some of us are concerned that if Bateman performs passably while the other two show out, Bateman will still get the nod because he's a more conservative option.

The people who are saying that they hope he stinks it up on Saturday are probably saying that under the conditions that:

1) Barnett and/or Hurts show out again and can be dynamic starters for us if given the chance

and that:

2) Bateman is legitimately flawed in such a way that starting him would put the team in a worse position.

Until we lost to Ole Miss last year, I felt like we had been playing games not to lose most of the time for the last few years. Even in 2012 we sort of played that way, even though we won a national championship in the end. If Bateman can play ball, great. But if he's just the conservative option, I feel it sets the wrong attitude for the program.

Full disclosure: I didn't think Bateman played all that poorly last season, especially in the short passing game. His deep throws are concerning though, and it would be nice if we had a QB who could make the safeties respect the deep ball.

Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73343 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:11 pm to
Four downvotes? Damn there are some haters.
Posted by FleshEatingSalsa
Floating down the Anduin
Member since Dec 2009
12319 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Four downvotes?


It wouldn't let me downvote it more than once.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73343 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:19 pm to
I don't upvote my own posts (but I though about it), but I am not trolling. I truly am behind Bateman. I just don't get the hate for him. This QB race is ten fold worse than the two previous, in terms of the fans.
Posted by remaster916
Alabama
Member since Oct 2012
13042 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

The more I think about it, the more I disagree.

If you think you can beat them by lining up and just blowing them off the ball, that is the perfect time to start a young QB. The pressure won't be on him and you can bring him up slowly all the while building his confidence.

Of course, I'm still waiting on Nick to ask me my thoughts on the matter so I'm not certain that my opinion matters too much......





The important thing running the ball like that is getting the right call and making sure everyone is lined up right. That would favor a QB who has been in the system the longest, which would be Bateman.

I would be very surprised if Bateman didn't start against USC.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
7879 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:35 pm to
We will be improved at QB this year no matter who starts. I'm looking forward to that.
first pageprev pagePage 47 of 114Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter