Started By
Message
re: Charles Bediako Suing NCAA for immediate Eligibility.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 8:14 pm to dirtsandwich
Posted on 2/6/26 at 8:14 pm to dirtsandwich
Wouldn’t surprise me one bit if it comes out tomorrow morning he is not eligible, even on a Saturday.
1
Posted on 2/6/26 at 8:36 pm to A-TOWNUAFAN
Wouldn’t shock me.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:38 am to dirtsandwich
when are we expected to get our next ruling on this? today?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:39 am to bamabenny
Likely today sometime this afternoon
Posted on 2/9/26 at 4:29 pm to Panthers4life
Wonder why this decision is so tough to make. Shouldn't be taking this long. The law is black and white. Even if he wants to ban Bediako, I really think the law says he has to play. NCAA did this to themselves with wishy washy decisions.
I really think he is just trying his best to justify NOT allowing Bediako to play, and cant find it. He really doesnt seem to like the UA athletic department.
I really think he is just trying his best to justify NOT allowing Bediako to play, and cant find it. He really doesnt seem to like the UA athletic department.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 4:29 pm to Panthers4life
The judge when all the arguments were turned in
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:13 pm to Sandkhan
Bediako Denied. At least the circus is over.
Need Bristow back.
Need Bristow back.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:18 pm to mistaken4193
This sucks. Ceiling just got a lot lower. None of this hypocritical shite makes sense and this is going to drive people away from college sports.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:19 pm to Sandkhan
Bediako had a negative +/- in 4 of the 5 games he played in.
Need Bristow back and we will be OK. And Noah and TBB gotta step up
Need Bristow back and we will be OK. And Noah and TBB gotta step up
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:22 pm to mistaken4193
He was also just working his way back in to the college game/our system. His impact was palpable and he’s our only big man with any above the rim threat.
Bristow plays hard but is a 0 offensively. Like 4 on 5 offensively.
Bristow plays hard but is a 0 offensively. Like 4 on 5 offensively.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:25 pm to Sandkhan
Im sorry, I do not understand the difference legally from what's Charles was doing vs Nnaji and the others. They've all signed similar contracts.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:26 pm to mistaken4193
quote:
Bediako had a negative +/- in 4 of the 5 games he played in. Need Bristow back and we will be OK. And Noah and TBB gotta step up
No matter how it is spun, one isn’t like the rest
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:27 pm to VaBamaMan
The difference is our local judge is a try hard and they all got judges that didn’t give a frick.
Judge is an absolute cornball for this.
Judge is an absolute cornball for this.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:28 pm to A-TOWNUAFAN
and Bristow isnt going to play again. Nate said he is out for the year. We basically only have Sherrell and Williamson now.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:29 pm to Sandkhan
quote:
Judge is an absolute cornball for this.
He has to hate the athletic department
good grief we are going to get reamed by the media for playing him even more now.
I assume this can be appealed?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:29 pm to mistaken4193
quote:He's not playing again this season.
Need Bristow back.
Oh well. Maybe make a S16 if things fall right.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:30 pm to VaBamaMan
Qualifying closed a week ago and the judge is unopposed. Would’ve been nice to send his arse home.
Sankey can get fricked
Sankey can get fricked
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:31 pm to mistaken4193
Thanks for a good final game Chuck. Sure would be nice if all the pros would start becoming ineligible again.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:32 pm to Bryant91092
why the frick did the first judge give in to the recusal request? His coworker just made him look like a piece of shite too.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 5:33 pm to VaBamaMan
This was inevitable. I think Charles had a decent case but his attorney is not super impressive.
Page 17 of 22
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News