Are conference title games soon to pass? Ohio State rather than Big 10 winner

Nope. The $$$ speak louder than the playoffs

quote:

---

.it sets a precedent that favors Alabama going forward

---

Ironic that the LSU vs Alabama rematch is often cited as the impetus for the playoffs. A lot of people, including Ohio State fans, complain to this day about Alabama playing in that one despite not having won the conference.

"You shouldn't play for a National Championship if you don't win your conference." — Urban Meyer, 2006

When, not if, we go to 8 teams in the playoffs, the most logical thing to do would be to get rid of the 12th game they approved a few years ago as most of them are just an excuse to schedule an FCS school and collect a check. Then the number of games remains the same but you aren't killing what is a de facto playoff game in many instances. One that generates much interest and a lot of money at least in the SEC. The rest of these conferences should be ashamed of theirs with the give-away ticket prices and empty stadia.

quote:

---

"You shouldn't play for a National Championship if you don't win your conference." — Urban Meyer, 2006

---

FWIW, ESPN interviewed him and he didn't really back down from that sentiment. He said that winning the conference is huge and something that they work for. It's the goal the team works forward and it should be a huge part of the CFP process. I thought he handled the interview perfectly.

Well sure it does. As long as they are in place the committee will place on emphasize on it but it's not THE deciding factor as we just saw with OSU

quote:

---

When, not if, we go to 8 teams in the playoffs, the most logical thing to do would be to get rid of the 12th game they approved a few years ago as most of them are just an excuse to schedule an FCS school and collect a check.

---

There will be 127 FBS teams next year. 119 are not going to give up the revenue their school makes from that 12th game just to let 8 teams have a playoff.

quote:

---

There will be 127 FBS teams next year. 119 are not going to give up the revenue their school makes from that 12th game just to let 8 teams have a playoff.

---

Exactly, the 12th game is guaranteed revenue. The Championship game is a moneymaker but it isnt guaranteed.
If an 8team playoff happens, I see the championship game being done away with

I don't think they will ever go away completely. Conferences are too big now and they will want some sort of final game to determine the winner of the leagues.

My guess is any future discussion of expansion in the playoff will include P5 conference champions, making those games play-in games (like the basketball tournaments). So, you'll have the five P5 champions + 1 G5 + 2 wild cards.

Something along those lines.

Then something's gotta give. I don't think the school presidents and others will allow student athletes to go to a 16 game potential schedule. I still say the 12th game will be a bargaining chip. The 4 higher seeds in the playoffs won't lose anything as it is almost a guarantee, if you expand to 8, round one will be on campus. A huge payday, sellout. The idea has been floated you use the additional TV revenue from the extra round to compensate schools for the lost 12th game revenue. I'm not sure the numbers work, but that is what has been proposed.

You could also envision a scenario where the end of the conference title game could lead to the breakup of some conferences. Why have divisions if you don't need them? and if you combine divisions as the SEC does in baseball and basketball, 14 teams becomes a bit cumbersome for scheduling, especially if it's not geographically compact. Why should Miami and Syracuse remain in the same conference if they never face each other and it doesn't benefit them over say, joining the SEC and B1G respectively? No conference title game almost dictates the dissolution of the mega-conferences. I'm not saying it would happen, but it would damn sure put some added pressure on some of them. You think West Virginia likes traveling halfway across the country to their nearest conference foe? And vice-versa? Suddenly, 8-10 members, especially the right ones from a TV perspective, is a lot more sensible. What if the SEC decided that Missou, Arkansas, Mississippi State and South Carolina just weren't bringing enough to the table to sustain their place? You're back to 10 schools, all in reasonable proximity, with most of the TV sets still accounted for, and the big time brand names intact and they can play each other almost every year. I could see any or all of the Big 5 splintering and/or realigning again. Be careful what you wish for, ESPN, you may get more than you bargained for.