Favorite team:South Carolina 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:80
Registered on:9/8/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
They could always do a split screen for 30 second timeouts and post-kickoff/pre-offensive snaps, similar to what I’ve seen for NFL games. However, that makes too much sense.
(The Original) USC:

My three biggest areas of concern
1. RBs
2. Loggains’ playcalling potential (I think it’ll be much better than Shatterfield’s, especially if the offense is like it was the last three games)
3. Front seven on defense

That said, they’ll probably win a game or two they shouldn’t, and lose a game or two they shouldn’t - much like last season (beating Texas A&M, UT and Clemson and losing to Mizzou).

7-5
I know it’s not finalized yet, but SC without UGA on the schedule is like peanut butter without jelly. It doesn’t make sense.

It does take away a near-certain loss most years…
I wouldn’t mind seeing a 4-4-1 format but I don’t think each school would have a neutral site close enough to accommodate attendees.

UGA and UF have Jacksonville; OU and TX have the Cotton Bowl. Alabama and Auburn used to play games at Legion Field but that complex was crumbling and located in a bad area. Ole Miss and MSU had games in Jackson, usually against each other but also against LSU (at least in the case of the former). SC has played games in Charlotte but that’s usually against non-conference opponents (I think they play the other Carolina there to start the upcoming season). There’s probably other examples that I can’t think of atm, but does every school have that opportunity?
Correct. SC was a later entry into the SIAA, and an earlier entry into the SoCon (about a year after the conference began operations). The SEC began operations during the Depression; I’m guessing economic conditions of the time (and the fact its main rivals were also east of the mountains) kept the ‘Cocks east. They would become charter members of the ACC in 1953, but I’ll leave the reason that they left to someone that has more knowledge on the subject (I do know that the NC schools played a part in that, and that Clemson would have left as well if they had any backbone).
That’s the one thing I’d like to know about before any development takes place - what will be done to mitigate the risk of flooding as much as possible? IIRC, that’s one of the factors that killed the Green Diamond project - and I think I was still in college when this was discussed (early 2000’s).

ETA: if the school already has the funding for it, bra-vo! I’m surprised that this was kept a secret for this long…

re: 9 Game Format Problem

Posted by miked237 on 2/10/23 at 1:17 pm
There are a few schools that have neutral-site games (WLOCP and RRS come to mind). The remaining schools would have an issue securing enough attendance for a neutral site game, even if there’s large enough stadia within a shorter distance. My guess is that for those schools that don’t have neutral sites readily available, it’ll be 5H/4A one year, then 4H/5A the next (alternating each year) - similar to how the NFL allocates home/away with a 17-game season.

ETA: the 5th game - in theory - would be against a school outside of the 3 rivals.

re: According the The Athletic

Posted by miked237 on 2/10/23 at 11:06 am
quote:

USCe gets UGA, UK, UF


If true, this isn’t bad at all. Should be competitive most years, with the current exception of UGA.

quote:

A&M gets tu, LSU, State


This’ll be fun… I’ll get the popcorn ready!
Both true and false. The competition in the SEC will be tougher than it was in the B12 even if they’re both natty contenders (which they’re not, at least for now). The exposure they’ll receive in the SEC will ensure that attention will be given to them. NIL also plays a huge part in this, especially for Texas. Only question for each school is do they have the coaching required to compete with the likes of Saban, Kirby and (to an extent) Kelly while also holding off potential up-and-comers like Heupel and Beamer.

For non-football sports, they should fit in nicely, especially for baseball (for Texas) and softball (for OU). Men’s BB will also become a bit more legit IMO.

re: Historical SEC Rankings

Posted by miked237 on 1/10/23 at 12:50 pm
quote:

The east and west go in cycles, the east had the head to head this season, this isn’t 2015 anymore


The east was also beast in the 90s with Florida and UTk, and that was with UGA being down. Of course, Bama was on probation for a good portion of it; same with Auburn IIRC. LSU was a coaches’ carousel during that time as well.

ETA: how many teams won the west in that decade? I know Arky and MSST won at least once each.

re: Bama with 5 OL in the portal…

Posted by miked237 on 12/6/22 at 2:01 pm
quote:

Come on to SC we need those


I concur, along with an OC that can utilize his playmakers properly…
Until then, we’ll just point and laugh.
For starters, SC and…


…Vandy! :lol: :lol: :lol:

re: LSU vs Purdue in the Citrus

Posted by miked237 on 12/4/22 at 2:16 pm
Purdue is technically the B1G runner-up and the Nuts are in the CFP. Seems legit.

re: We deserved the 3 seed.

Posted by miked237 on 12/4/22 at 11:46 am
In OT, no less…
tRant would require that Sandstorm be played in the stadium every commercial break.

re: Jumbo Fisher buyout by year

Posted by miked237 on 10/23/22 at 8:36 am
That’s to make up for the previous screwup who will not be named…
quote:

Neither does Texas


3-8 lifetime against Vandy