Started By
Message

re: UGA Season Long Basketball Thread (18-15, 7-11); Georgia to decline NIT bid

Posted on 2/18/18 at 9:18 am to
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10065 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 9:18 am to
quote:

most on here are always impressed with how well Fox has “coached up” the mediocre talent we’ve had


It's the in-game coaching and motivation (or lack thereof) in games we need I think that constantly gets people pissed.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36728 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

We do have a top 100 player coming in this year and 2 top 50 commitments for next year. I would agree with you, but I just don’t know what happens to the 2 top 50 players if Fox leaves

i tend to agree with this but you also definitely cant be afraid to make program changes because a couple of 18 year olds may possible sorta be good one day
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

i tend to agree with this but you also definitely cant be afraid to make program changes because a couple of 18 year olds may possible sorta be good one day


Exactly... keeping a coach because of recruits is a losing proposition 10/10 times. Yante was a top player if not THE best player in the league this year... it isn't enough to offset poor coaching decisions.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
11384 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:57 pm to
Yante maten was also a 3 star and not even in the top 200. 2 top 50 players is a little different.

But if we bring in a good coach that should make them want to come even more. Problem is, the Ad won't hire a top coach. He will hire some cheap young guy and then we will be back to where we were with Felton.
This post was edited on 2/18/18 at 7:05 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45718 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:59 pm to
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say I think we won last night because Mike Edwards only played 2 minutes.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

Yante maten was also a 3 star and not even in the top 200. 2 top 50 players is a little different.


Yeah... one of them is a proven commodity in the conference, the other we are *hopeful* will have the same level of impact.

quote:

But if we bring in a good coach that should make them want to come even more.

Exactly.

quote:

Problem is, the Ad won't hire a top coach. He will hire some cheap young guy and then we will be back to where we were with Felton.


I don't have any more faith in McGarity than you do, but at this point, I think the "McCheapskate" talk is getting loud enough that he may be forced into a corner a bit... maybe the only positive to comeout of the debacle that was raising the ticket prices in football. When there are articles outright calling him a lame-duck AD, I would think if he could land a high quality basketball coach in addition to Kirby Smart in football, that could literally re-write his "legacy".
Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2365 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say I think we won last night because Mike Edwards only played 2 minutes.


This....that guy should never see the floor barring massive injuries to the guys in front of him. A total liability in every respect.
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26398 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 10:09 pm to
quote:


i tend to agree with this but you also definitely cant be afraid to make program changes because a couple of 18 year olds may possible sorta be good one day



This isn’t football....2 Top 50 players in the country ((including #8) can completely change the landscape of the program and recruiting moving forward.

It isn’t the same as a football player needing development...a top 10 basketball prospect can single handily take a team to the promise land. That is worth the wait.

Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 12:55 am to
quote:

This isn’t football....2 Top 50 players in the country ((including #8) can completely change the landscape of the program and recruiting moving forward.


Ok... so throw out the rankings for a moment and let's just *pretend* that these 2 top 50 recruits are immediately elite impact players in the SEC and highly productive. Then let's think about 2016-2017... UGA had 2 of the best players that we've ever had on our roster and 2 of the most productive players in the SEC on the roster, and we not only didn't make the NCAA tournament, but lost in the first round of the NIT.

Even if I assume that the 2 recruits that are only *committed* to UGA, actually come, I have to also assume that they offer significantly better production as freshmen than the combination of JJ as a senior and Yante as a junior together - in order to not only offset Fox as a coach but also to account for the general improvements we've seen within the league in the past year. While it's certainly possible, it is a hell of a leap to make when you consider Fox's in game decision making and general approach to the game. The second part of that, the improvement in the league, is one of the reasons many of us felt that last year was the time to make that move... the league is improving one way or the other... Fox does not seem to have the impetus to drive our growth at a pace faster than the "rate of inflation" if you will.

Secondarily, you're making the assumption that if you replace Fox with what would be viewed as an objectively better coach, that those recruits would then *not* come to UGA (even though most of their remarks have been about doing something special close to home, and a coaching change doesn't necessarily negate that). I recognize that the better coach is a leap of faith as well... because let's face it, McGarity doesn't have a lot of credibility in that arena... however... for those of us who think it's not just time, but past time to move on from Fox, we're also advocating that we should be targeting an objectively BETTER coach... no one is saying we should can Fox and then go target George Ivory (HC of Arkansas Pine Bluff)... If my option is keep Fox or go try and grab a bargain basement head coach with next to no track record, fine... keep him for one more year and then let the new AD make the decision... but then we're making the assumption that McGarity is also gone at the end of this contract... which I think most of us *hope* is true, but who knows...

If we're to assume that 2 solid recruits can make a team good enough to offset a coach's deficiencies, wouldn't those same 2 recruits be better with a better coach?

In that regard, you're right... it's *not* like football at all. Instead, if those 2 players are in fact good enough as freshmen to have JJ/Yante level production, then we're in effect keeping Fox for what will amount to potential lottery picks after their Freshman or Sophomore seasons, whereas in football, you're at least guaranteed 3 years if you can keep them out of trouble and eligible academically (no different than basketball on that caveat)... And yet, Fox has not recruited at that level with any consistency, so anticipating him to follow that class with 2 *more* top 100 players even is probably expecting a bit more than he can bite off.

It's fair to acknowledge that Fox has probably run his course here and that someone else could pick up where he left off to advance the ball without saying that he's been some kind of abject failure. You also can't really consider it a great hire either though, when you compare it to the other hire made essentially at the same time using the same search firm - Tony Bennett at UVA. They were not terribly dissimilar candidates at the time... longer track record on Fox, Bennett at a larger program and had a sweet 16 run but had just lost in the first round of the NIT in the previous season. We got Fox for the bargain price of 1.3M compared to Bennett at 1.7M...

The team essentially has no identity under him at this point... independent of his maddeningly frustrating decision making, substitution patterns, or "offensive philosophy" (if you can call it one), the team flat out doesn't consistently show the level of hustle/effort required to win consistently with his "style" of basically poor man's "defense first" basketball. Not to mention that we continue to find ourselves poor at things like ball handling/passing, limiting turnovers, and/or breaking press coverage - all things that should be more or less "coachable".

KCP was also an elite recruit (#12 nationally), who played very well for us... but was not a sign of things to come on the recruiting front nor continued success after his 2 seasons with the Bulldogs... And that was while the era of newness around what Fox could bring to the program was quite real. As opposed to year 9 and either stalled out or moving backwards slightly seeming to be the "direction" of the program.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
11384 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:02 am to
Frazier was also not a top 200 player. I think you are misunderstanding the magnitude of having 2 top 50 players.

Not saying we should keep Fox but this is a big deal.

We can't frick this up.
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 1:12 am
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 3:00 am to
quote:

Frazier was also not a top 200 player. I think you are misunderstanding the magnitude of having 2 top 50 players.

Not saying we should keep Fox but this is a big deal.

I think *you're* misunderstanding... the idea that they are a top 50 *recruit* doesn't automatically make them a top player in the SEC from a *production* standpoint... and the only thing that will actually matter on the court is exactly that.

So you've got a few issues with the idea that Fox should be retained due to recruits:

1) He already had a roster with essentially 2 top 5 players in the conference and couldn't make it to a tournament, let alone win in it...

2) They are simply commits at this time... there is nothing that says that we retain those commitments even if we keep Fox. Oh... and unless one reclassifies for 18, they won't be here until after another full season. So you're not just talking about keeping Fox through next season, but probably extending him through 2 additional seasons just to see how he manages to get on with 2 elite freshmen...

and 3) A good hire could easily retain them... Top 50 guys are going to get drafted... period. Nothing about Fox's history could really be giving them a ton of inspiration in his ability to get them prepared for the NBA in short order, so it would seem that their comments about doing it "close to home" might actually carry more weight than the coach.



It's an important hire to make, to be certain, but then again, it is the same with firing any coach for anything other than cause... we've seen verbal commitments fall to shite with much better coaches securing them... there's just no sense in counting on the recruits as a reason to keep Fox around. The right coaching hire should more than makeup for losing them *if* we lose them at all... and if it's not the right coach, we literally can't win fewer games in the NCAA tournament with them than we did with Fox up to this point.

All of this may be moot... maybe Fox wins out, wins a few in the SEC tourney and even a first round matchup in the big dance... at which point, whether I think he should have been gone will be irrelevant... but I do believe we've more or less seen what Fox is capable of, and it's not what most of us would define as palatable success for the long haul.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 7:33 am to
I just heard about Fox’s whiny press conference where he accused the media of hating players and not, you know, just critizing his mediocre tenure.

I’m with Fib on this, he may get these players in here but nothing leads me to believe he’ll do anything more than a 1st round tournament loss

Additionally, those worried about McGarity blowing the hire. In my opinion I want to know now if McGarity is willing to commit. As someone else said, the eyes seem to already be on him. If he makes another mediocre hire and continues to only be able to point at football as his success then we have yet another piece of evidence that he also needs to be removed. It’s riskier and it puts the basketball program in harms way but I’d rather see them reduced to Felton levels if it leads to a better Athletic Director and basketball bal coach in the end, even if it’s Fox’s replacement’s replacement.

It’s easy to say that now but I guess I can’t see Fox being more than what he’s shown and McGarity making a worthwhile hire unless the same boosters who forced him to hire Kirby come back in.
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 7:39 am
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14054 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 8:22 am to
May as well stick it out with Fox until we get a new AD. Anyone worth a shot isn’t gonna settle for coaching the SEC team that’s at the bottom on spending for Men’s BBall.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:37 am to
Yea I agree. I guess my thought process is that even though our athetlics aren’t in a great place overall that you’d need Basketball to really tank along with baseball to get him ousted if the football program is on solid footing.

My idea is that only way Greg gets booted is if

A) he doesn’t support the football program and it becomes Kirby and/or boosters vs McGarity and his staff or

B) baseball and basketball erode to the point that everyone realizes that pretty much all of our sports are in lulls and McGarity can’t hide behind football any longer
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 11:39 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89796 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:40 am to
I disagree with it entirely. And the people thinking/wanting greg to be fired, his contract ends summer of 2019 so he aint going anywhere until then, when he likely retires.

With Fox it's been 9 years, you know wtf you have. There aren't any surprises anymore, he is what he is. So yes I want to make a change regardless how much our AD cares or what scandals are out there or anything else. Because best case we improve (which any coach we bring in would be almost impossible NOT to be a better in game coach), or worst case we continue not making the NCAAT, which we already don't anyway. So what's the worst case scenario here honestly? We don't even make the NIT instead of losing in the first round of the NIT? So what? Nine years is ridiculously too long for him to be here and if he isn't fired it's a total slap in the face to people who actually want to see the program succeed.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45718 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:56 am to
Right now, Lunardi has us as his 8th team out. Honestly, we probably need to win every game to put us in the field, or win 3 out of 4 and then get two Conference Tourney wins.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89796 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Right now, Lunardi has us as his 8th team out.


LOL the life of a UGA fan under fox in mid February. I've seen this movie before, many times actually.

"Well, if we had only won those 2 games earlier against shite teams we should have beat we'd be a solid 8 seed. But forget that, we've still got a chance! We just need to win out, and have 3 other teams lose half their remaining games, then that one small mid-major we beat in November win their conference to boost our RPI, then win 2 games in the SEC Tourney...and we're in!!!!"

Same thing every year. We aren't making the tournament. We don't deserve to make the tournament. We will probably make the NIT and will get bounced in 2 games or less. Same as it ever was with fox.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14054 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 12:40 pm to
Outside shots at the tourney has been UGA for most of my years as a fan. That’s not a Fox thing.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89796 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Outside shots at the tourney has been UGA for most of my years as a fan. That’s not a Fox thing.


Understood, but nothing is keeping it a UGA thing other than our unwillingness to go get the best coach we can. It damn sure aint fox, so we really have nothing to lose by making a change.

I know you've been around a lot longer than I have, but I first really started following the program around ~2000ish. I've seen our crowds in a rabid frenzy and us have a legit elite 8 caliber team. We currently have a better stegeman, better practice facility, and more money than we had back then. The only difference is the coaches. No reason we can't get back there.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10065 posts
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:15 pm to
I'm firmly with WG on this.

We have plenty of resources and if we have a great basketball program, fans will come.

We'll be as good a program as we damn well decide we'll be. Probably won't ever be Kentucky or Duke, but we can absolutely become what Florida basketball became. Nothing is holding us back from that.
first pageprev pagePage 49 of 71Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter