re: Tiger perspective

look how long his thumbnail is...classic wanker technique.

The shat we argue about over here. Did we really have a battle about 2 guys with 0 catches to their name replacing Sammy freaking Watkins?? Sammy may be the best WR since AJ & Megatron. Damare freaking Kitt ain't doing jack shat Saturday. Book it muthafarker.

quote:

---

Divin Tiger

---

A/S/L?

quote:

---

Cole reminds me of a polished Jacob Park without the arm

---

So...Hutson mason?

What is Clemson's record in Sanford Stadium?
























2-20.

quote:

---

We did lose a lot on the offensive side. I don't think any sane Clemson fan would argue that. I would argue that both defenses are a wash. We both have really good front 7s and questionable secondaries. The reason I'm think Clemson wins is that I think the passing game will be more important that the running game because it will be hard to run against either team.

That being said Gurley scares the crap out of me. I know that if he finds space it will be a long night for me.

---

Welcome to the board. Please excuse many on here. They go to TigerNet and complain that thye can't have a serious football discussion, then when someone comes here looking for serious discussion they do nothing but troll and flame. Go figure.

We are feeling pretty good about our secondary right now. we think it can be at least average, and hopefully a little better. Our thoughts are that Grantham was trying to run too complicated a defense last season and many of our players lined up unsure of what their exact responsibilities were. Pruitt is simplifying things a bit. With Stoudt not having much experience we think he will have a hard time. The thing you said that stuck out with me is that

quote:

---

I would argue that both defenses are a wash.

---

I can go with that. BUT, if that is the case, whose offense do you think is better? We have returned almost our entire receiver corps and all of our running backs. Plus, we have added two 5* running backs in Chubb and Sony Michel to improve our depth. Mason has started two games and played over a half in another (MAYBE a little under a half), throwing for 189yard in the shortened game, and 299 and 320 yards in the last two games. He threw for 320 against Nebraska, which had one of the better secondaries in the nation. So, we have a lot of confidence in his abilities. (Not to mention he set many passing records when he was in High School here in Georgia)

I think we will run the ball more than throw against you guys, but that is my opinion. I hink this because it will be early in the season with a lot of heat and humidity. With our depth at RB we will try to wear down your front 7.

Any way you slice it, it should be a good game...definitely very interesting.

You clearly have not seen that our entire O line is white.

Clemsun fuct.

quote:

---

Kneehigh

---

You know more about CU than 90% of their own fanbase does...

Hell at least you give some real info on their team depth & skills...

Ask a clemson fan why they'll win & all they can reply with is....

quote:

---

'cause..... we're the best & cole gonna beat your arse, ugay sucks...

---

fricking mouthbreathing, window licking, tractor driving, sister fricking, toothless freaks...

I made the unfortunate mistake of watching a Clemson tard video yesterday, the one where he's in Sanford. It was long so I basically watched a few seconds at a time and then kept skipping through for the whole way.

No joke, in just the few second snippets at a time I saw, at least FOUR times he mentioned that our players are going to fake injuries. dafuq? Where does that come from? If they were playing auburn, I'd get it. But that just doesn't make much sense to me. Or any, really.

They don't want none. I will tell you this... Watson will play around 8-10 plays, maybe more. They will try utilize him in short yardage situations operating the zone read. He's also not known as a mobile QB. The more I think about this game, the better I like our chances.