Started By
Message

re: Never change, TigerNet...

Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:53 am to
Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I can’t handle all the salt

I can’t handle all of the advertisements for Affliction tee-shirts and “the Secret to belly fat burning” on their threads.
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
23164 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 9:18 am to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
48543 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 10:16 am to
We had 3-4 guys missing from the travel roster who would have normally traveled. Not hard to figure out.
Posted by Griffindawg
Member since Oct 2013
8129 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 10:35 am to
Poor special teams? We pinned them on almost every punt. And the only reason that punt touched our player was clemsons punt was short as frick
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
48543 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 11:05 am to
Argument can be made that the punt that touched Kendall’s foot me touched the Clemson player’s foot first, too
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14024 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 12:34 pm to
It touched the Clemsons dudes leg first.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26046 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 12:47 pm to
The booth referee said that touching clemson first wouldnt matter as he was blocked into the punt.

I dont understand why it wouldnt matter for the punt team but being blocked into the ball affects the return team. But that is what he said.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14024 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 1:03 pm to
Hmmm. I um under the impression it is a dead ball regardless
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26046 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 2:31 pm to
Im clueless. Just passing along what the retired ref said.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

The booth referee said that touching clemson first wouldnt matter as he was blocked into the punt.

I dont understand why it wouldnt matter for the punt team but being blocked into the ball affects the return team. But that is what he said.

B/c when you have first touching by K, R can take it at that spot(where the beanbag is). But if R blocks K into the ball then that option is off the table. It all comes down to advantage/disadvantage.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

I um under the impression it is a dead ball regardless



It is dead once the kick ends. I.e..Possesion.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14024 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 5:37 pm to
Article 4 seems to be, in spirit, protecting the receiving team from being blocked into the ball to create a fumble .

Touching and Recovery of a Free Kick; Illegal Touching
ARTICLE 3. a. No Team A player may touch a free-kicked ball until after:
1. 2.
3.
It touches a Team B player (Exception: Rules 6-1-4 and 6-5-1-b); It breaks the plane of and remains beyond Team B’s restraining line (Exception: Rule 6-4-1) (A.R. 2-12-5-I); or
It touches any player, the ground, an official or anything else beyond Team B’s restraining line.
Thereafter, all players of Team A become eligible to touch, recover or
catch the kick.
b. Any other touching by Team A is illegal touching, a violation that, when
the ball becomes dead, gives the receiving team the privilege of taking the
ball at the spot of the violation.
c. If there is an accepted penalty for a live-ball foul by either team, or if there
are offsetting fouls, the illegal touching privilege is canceled (A.R. 6-1-3-I).
d. Illegal touching in Team A’s end zone is ignored.
Forced Touching Disregarded
ARTICLE 4. a. A player blocked by an opponent into a free kick is not, while inbounds, deemed to have touched the kick. (A. R. 2-11-4-I)
b. An inbounds player touched by a ball either batted or illegally kicked by
an opponent is not deemed to have touched the ball. (Rule 2-11-4-c)
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
14024 posts
Posted on 9/7/21 at 6:05 pm to
Also, there was no blocking. Both players were trying to avoid the ball and hit each other. At worst, it should still have been a live ball after hitting both, but the spirit of the rule is a dead ball when the Clemson guy touched it.
Posted by Griffindawg
Member since Oct 2013
8129 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:52 am to
Ah ha. I found it. Seems like this should be brought back to light in lieu of last Saturday’s events.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75704 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:46 pm to
Outstanding bump.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter