Started By
Message

re: Adam Anderson's attorney asks Georgia to reconsider suspension

Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:44 pm to
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

You mean it “wasn’t rooted in politics”, because it sure as shite IS now.



Well, roots don't change. Christianity is rooted in Judaism. That will never change; that doesn't mean Christianity hasn't evolved over time, of course.

But I do agree with the sentiment that the movement has changed over time.
Posted by GADAWG2017
Member since Jul 2017
518 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:45 pm to
This^^^^^^ is what is wrong with society. People denying the obvious to signal their superior morality. No one understands or could ever get what liberals do… we’re unable
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Let me guess….you voted for Brain dead Biden?


I didn't. But I don't see how political affiliation is germane to this topic.
Posted by Dawgy49
North Georgia
Member since Sep 2015
4851 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I didn't. But I don't see how political affiliation is germane to this topic.


Because it’s overwhelmingly supported more by democrats than republicans and you seem to be a supporter?

LINK /
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

This^^^^^^ is what is wrong with society. People denying the obvious to signal their superior morality. No one understands or could ever get what liberals do… we’re unable


I do not follow.
Posted by GADAWG2017
Member since Jul 2017
518 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:01 pm to
Doesn’t surprise me
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:09 pm to
Well can you elaborate then?
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6947 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Let me guess….you voted for Brain dead Biden?


You just politicized the discussion. What Dawgirl said is correct.
Posted by Dawgy49
North Georgia
Member since Sep 2015
4851 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

You just politicized the discussion. What Dawgirl said is correct.


You must have a problem with reading and comprehending?

This discussion was politicized when the MeToo movement was introduced.
Not sure what Dawgirl was correct about however I’ve read nothing she posted that I disagree with?
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49336 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:26 pm to
You seem to have a hard time understanding this, if a guy is sober and the girl is drunk then yes she cannot give consent and it would the exact same if the roles are reversed.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49336 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

understand how insidious and terrible the Left is after continually watching them hijack every fricking thing they can and make it a political tool in their weaponized arsenal of division and exploitation.

It’s truly amazing how you can say something right then just go full retard and fall arse backwards into political tribalism
Posted by Dawgy49
North Georgia
Member since Sep 2015
4851 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

You seem to have a hard time understanding this, if a guy is sober and the girl is drunk then yes she cannot give consent and it would the exact same if the roles are reversed.


This statement is true. What’s not known here is a lot. Was she drunk, says who? Was he drunk, says who? Is this a he said/she said incident or are there other persons with knowledge? What was their prior relationship? Did she give conflicting statements as his lawyer claims? How did she get to the house, how did she leave? Whose house is it?
We’re all just really in the blind to a lot of facts.
Posted by GADAWG2017
Member since Jul 2017
518 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 5:00 pm to
If you don’t understand the concept of virtue signaling, then you’re willfully ignorant and it’s a waste of time explaining it to you.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 5:02 pm
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 5:07 pm to
Which part did you consider to be virtue signaling?
Posted by GADAWG2017
Member since Jul 2017
518 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

The metoo movement isn't rooted in politics. It's just people talking about sexual assault they have experienced. What's it like to know that your chances of being sexually assaulted is extremely low? That must be a freeing feeling. I guess that's why there are a lot of cavalier attitudes around it. Not just here, but in general.


Then you went on to reference theology as an attempt to give yourself some moral authority. Better yet what have you posted on this subject that you weren’t assuming a morally superior posture?
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:02 pm to
I wasn't meaning to make a comparison from the metoo movement to religion as a basis for moral superiority; rather just using it as a comparison to clarify the meaning of the word "rooted." That's it. I'm not even religious nor do I consider myself superior to anyone else. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

It’s truly amazing how you can say something right then just go full retard and fall arse backwards into political tribalism
If you haven’t noticed by now, I hate both sides of the political dichotomy, think the 2-party system sucks and is at the core of our problems, and have a huge distrust in our entire government, the donor class, and the global “elite” in general.

The GOP are engulfed in cronyism and corruption and vying for globalism and big government control just as much as the Progs/Dems, but just feigning the “passive impotent do-nothing but talk big” path to it, compared to the Prog’s “in your face and we don’t give a frick” approach, and the Dems “we’re moderates we promise, but we just gonna approve every extreme insane fricking thing the Progs want because it’s actually our agenda at warp-speed, which we secretly love… but we promise we’re really moderates” bullshite approach.

I’m the furthest thing from tribal. But one very obnoxiously huge difference that anyone with a brain and an ounce of intellectual honesty and integrity can see, is the Left side of that tribal spectrum clearly, CLEARLY, tries to turn everything that exists into a political cudgel to use as a weapon or a wedge to sow division.

For frick sakes, a black guy running for governor in California was called a fricking white supremacist, math is now somehow racist, anyone who simply disagrees with ANYTHING is a “phobic”, the climate and white people are more dangerous than goddamn China and North Korea, burning down cities, doing billions in damage, and a few dozen murders is “peaceful protesting” while unarmed trespassing and $5000 in damage is a fricking “insurrection”, and if you don’t want your 5 year old who has a 0.000004% chance of dying from a virus to get injected with a drug that has ZERO longterm studies and doesn’t even fricking prevent acquiring or transmitting the virus, you’re an evil murderous anti-vaxxer enemy that doesn’t deserve a job, medical care, or to even be alive.

The Right aren’t saints and certainly have a ton of bad ideals too, but the Left and their acolytes are the fricking most horrible, depraved, dishonest, and insufferable human beings I've witnessed in my time on this god forsaken planet.

And one thing I’ve absolutely noticed too, is that Lefties simply cannot stop accusing others of precisely what they are really guilty of. The self-awareness is non-existent and the intellectual dishonesty and cognitive dissonance is beyond vast in them.

I mean, if you only understood why you’re so butthurt about what I’ve said, which I know you are, maybe you’d have an epiphany over this and become self-aware. But you won’t. Very very few Lefties can.

So wallow in your angst and denial and move on. You won’t accomplish a damn thing trying to contradict me.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 8:22 pm
Posted by RattletrapDawg
Valdosta
Member since Sep 2012
2056 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:17 pm to
You let him play until he is actually arrested.
Posted by lewis and herschel
Member since Nov 2009
11363 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:22 pm to
Polical parties are functionally binary. Very few places have sustainable 3rd parties.

So we are down to 1 party systems like the USSR, Cuba, China, Nazi Germany. This is what the left in the US is trying to create and the media is in the middle of it. It would be the end of the US.

Two party system has its flaws but is the ying and yang of human nature. Its not perfect but it is the more perfect way. Thank god for it as it is democracy.
Posted by Litigator
Hog Jaw, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2013
7536 posts
Posted on 11/7/21 at 6:27 pm to
I’ve been on both sides of these cases as a lawyer and they are tough ones. If the alleged victim consumed alcohol and was impaired some jurors (if it made it that far) are going to hold that against her, notwithstanding any alleged incapacity to give consent. Of course that will always figure into her credibility. If she can’t remember critical things that damages the State’s case to the point that possibly it cannot even be pursued. The other evidence (or lack thereof) comes into play. The defendant’s statements (if any), other witnesses, and scientific evidence all can be big and decisive. If the defendant made a statement he’s pretty much locked in to that and it is either (1) didn’t happen or the State can’t prove that it did, or (2) consensual sex.

Truth is very few people are privy to the whole story. The prosecutor will receive a case file from the law enforcement agency(ies) following the investigation and he and his office will have as complete a picture as can be and then the defense will get it through discovery. The prosecutor will review the case file to see if charges are warranted based on the evidence. Either it is there or it is not and I have certainly declined to pursue very serious alleged offenses if I didn’t think a jury would be convinced of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Remember the Kobe Bryant case as proof that these cases can take twists and turns. LINK

Until then there will be just lots of speculation on message boards, social media, and in the news media. That’s pretty much always the case if any people involved fall into the notable person category.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 6:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter