Started By
Message
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:04 pm to Rex Feral
Khalil Barnes a 3 year contributor at safety for Clemson has entered. From Athens and we need safety help.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 1:55 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
We are going up to 18? I have been aware we have been at 17? Either way Texas Ohio State Oregon and Texas Tech all led this year around 25 million and LSU is committed to that much next year.
Take them bitches to the water
Take them bitches to the water
Posted on 12/10/25 at 2:00 pm to Sleazy_PugLeazy
quote:
Oh they didn’t ? I read it wrong then I thought they did
He lays it out in his announcement on IG. He makes it sound like docs cleared him but NCAA rules do not allow it so he needs to transfer where he can play.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 4:05 pm to Brick67
Man…dudes got a heart condition and isn’t cleared by NCAA? Obviously it’s serious.
I think I’d just move on with life. If your heart goes while playing or practicing that’s it. No OT for that one.
I think I’d just move on with life. If your heart goes while playing or practicing that’s it. No OT for that one.
This post was edited on 12/10/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 12/10/25 at 6:22 pm to claydawg09
quote:
Khalil Barnes a 3 year contributor at safety for Clemson has entered. From Athens and we need safety help.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:24 pm to td01241
quote:
We are going up to 18? I have been aware we have been at 17? Either way Texas Ohio State Oregon and Texas Tech all led this year around 25 million and LSU is committed to that much next year.
I'm wrong a lot, but my understanding is that the programs can now directly pay players up to 18 million out of their own budget on top of whatever NIL money they can conjure up from donors and boosters.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:17 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
on top of whatever NIL money they can conjure up from donors and boosters.
For whatever reason, UGA seems to have de-emphasized the "collective" approach to fund raising. I'm fine with that, because it's obviously pay to play and not "NIL" in any reasonable sense of the term, but it may impact roster management. It's hard to see how any program can consistently maintain a top roster while paying lower salaries. Even if Kirby can do that, it probably won't last beyond his tenure at UGA.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:50 pm to wdhalgren
Lucid perspective but it might also be somewhat analogous to the life decision to settle for a lower paying job to be close to home vs taking the highest paying job wherever aka catering to the highest bidder.
Objectively we seem to be better off with 4 star players who really want to be at UGA vs 5 stars like Raiola and Fields who really didn't want to be at Georgia.
Objectively we seem to be better off with 4 star players who really want to be at UGA vs 5 stars like Raiola and Fields who really didn't want to be at Georgia.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:23 pm to GurleyGirl
quote:
Objectively we seem to be better off with 4 star players who really want to be at UGA vs 5 stars like Raiola and Fields who really didn't want to be at Georgia.
That's why I'm okay with Georgia's approach. I enjoy watching athletes who strive for something other than the bottom line. It may or may not be the way to maximize outcomes every year, but it's fun to root for kids who still play for team and school.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:49 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
That's why I'm okay with Georgia's approach. I enjoy watching athletes who strive for something other than the bottom line. It may or may not be the way to maximize outcomes every year, but it's fun to root for kids who still play for team and school.
What percentage of our players wouldn't bail if someone offered them $30,000 a month more? I don't know the answer which is why I'm asking, but I'd say most of them.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top


1






