Started By
Message
re: Worst new coaching search ever?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 1:13 pm to Masterag
Posted on 10/31/17 at 1:13 pm to Masterag
quote:
How is Pepsi still in business?
They make the superior product.
quote:
Who are all these Pepsi drinkers?
We are legion
quote:
I can’t name one person I know that drinks Pepsi.
Hurtful
Posted on 10/31/17 at 1:15 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Amazing how anyone doesn't know that MOUNTAIN DEW is a Pepsi product.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 1:36 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
If I had ANY confidence in our decision makers I might be excited, but the Sumlin contract ruined it.
Everyone here wants us to money whip a big name but is mad that we used money to assure that nobody would steal away our guy who was the hot name at the time.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 1:51 pm to Dr RC
No one else in the country had such a ridiculous buyout clause, or lack thereof in our case, for a coach who has never won a title.
Or have you forgotten the seasons immediately following guaranteed contracts for the previous 2 coaches (2005, 2008)?
Or have you forgotten the seasons immediately following guaranteed contracts for the previous 2 coaches (2005, 2008)?
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:01 pm to Dr RC
TAMU should do the unthinkable... Hire Rich Rodriguez and actually let him coach. If Rich Rodriguez was allowed access to TX quality recruits/athletes + not sabotaged by alumni, his teams would run wild
Put this in perspective, RichRod at UArizona, the trashcan of Pac12 football
- On pace next year to be #2 Winningest UZona coach since 1930 in only 6 years
- 2nd most 8+ W seasons in school history (assuming 2017 8+W)
- 2nd Coach to win 10+W in a season school history
Rich Rod is 42-31
Of those 31 L, only 2 were against teams who didn't make bowl games
19/31 L were against final AP top 25 opponents
Put this in perspective, RichRod at UArizona, the trashcan of Pac12 football
- On pace next year to be #2 Winningest UZona coach since 1930 in only 6 years
- 2nd most 8+ W seasons in school history (assuming 2017 8+W)
- 2nd Coach to win 10+W in a season school history
Rich Rod is 42-31
Of those 31 L, only 2 were against teams who didn't make bowl games
19/31 L were against final AP top 25 opponents
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:12 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Finish your post.
Didn't mean to hit submit. Finished now, My bad
RichRod has won consistently at Arizona at levels previously unseen by Zona football, while Pac12 FB has been at its best.
The only blemish on his career is his tenure at Michigan, where he was showing an upward trend even after multiple alumni sabotage attempts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:14 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
No one else in the country had such a ridiculous buyout clause, or lack thereof in our case, for a coach who has never won a title.
Supply and demand. The demand for Sumlin was pretty high after 2012. An African American coach with so much potential demanded a premium.
Had we not given him the contract, he would have left A&M for USC or the NFL. Then you would have started threads bitching about our cheap boosters and how we would never win due to our lack of financial support.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:15 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
But this time around many of the Aggies I know IRL aren't looking forward to this search at all. Most know it has to happen if the season plays out how it looks to play out, but without an obvious choice (except a Chad whose SMU career isn't as good as Sumlin's UH career was) and the fact we will have to compete with other (let's be honest more attractive) SEC programs for coaches this offseason means that any sort of dream hire like Chip Kelly is off the table.
Look, I know I come across as the major Morris pumper on this board but as somebody who probably looks like I've also given Sumlin way more slack than most I just think the bolded is not really a fair claim to make.
Sumlin was given a team on the rise that had already been built up by an up and comer and was primed to take off. Morris took over a bottom 5 FBS school that had been driven into the dirt by a lazy old coach who was just cashing checks.
Houston went 3-8, 6-6, 10-4, 8-5 (Briles did not coach bowl loss) in four years before Sumlin came in. Houston then went 8-5, 10-4, 5-7, 13-1 (Sumlin did not coach bowl win). This was all done in CUSA.
SMU in the 4 years before Morris went 8-5, 7-6, 5-7, 0-12 (JJ quit after game two 43-6 loss to North Texas) under June Jones. Jones last two seasons are when SM left CUSA for the AAC. Morris has gone 2-10, 5-7, and is sitting at 6-2 this season.
Briles was recruiting well for Houston and left Sumlin with players like Case Keenum.
Jones was so lazy when it came to recruiting that he wasn't even willing to leave the SMU campus to go see kids at area high schools and instead wanted them to contact him and send him tapes to prove they were interested.
Sumlin was at a state commuter school that can get anyone in academically and is so serious about improving their team they built a new stadium, new weight room/player's facility, and are finishing out a new indoor playing facility.
Morris is at a school that has donors who openly scoff at their HCs wanting them to build an IPF and is academically stringent enough that there is actually some worry about getting certain players in.
I could go on but long story short, Houston has a lot more advantages and was much further along when Sumlin took over than what was there for Morris when he got to SMU.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:15 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Hire Rich Rodriguez and actually let him coach
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:17 pm to Texas Weazel
quote:
That will never happen. Our boosters don't like to be kept in the dark. Rich Rodriguez would have to entertain them from time to time.
Alternatively, they could just buy into his coaching style. It's surprisingly fun to watch guys run up and down the field in open space. Who knew?
RichRod is just getting shafted. He is the Dan Mullen of the West Coast. Not in a position capable of winning much more while not ignored for his lingering stigma
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:19 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
No one else in the country had such a ridiculous buyout clause, or lack thereof in our case, for a coach who has never won a title.
Or have you forgotten the seasons immediately following guaranteed contracts for the previous 2 coaches (2005, 2008)?
None of that matters. You can't demand that we money whip a coach but then get mad the money was whipped out if the results don't meet your expectations.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:25 pm to Dr RC
I'd have rather paid Sumlin 7 mill a year with a normal buyout. The money whip isn't the issue, the ignorant setup is.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:31 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:is this really true? Yes, Florida is a better job and will have their pick before everyone else. But after that? I'm cool with where we stand compared to auburn, tennessee, Arkansas, or ole miss
and the fact we will have to compete with other (let's be honest more attractive) SEC programs for coaches this offseason means that any sort of dream hire like Chip Kelly is off the table.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:33 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
we will have to compete with other (let's be honest more attractive) SEC programs
I would say its damn near a wash. UT & UF are better all-time programs, but facilities, recruiting base (on par with UF), and pay favor us.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:42 pm to Texas Weazel
THE MONEY IS NOT THE ISSUE!! THE LACK OF A BUYOUT OR ANY LEVERAGE BY THE SCHOOL IS.
A buyout should never be more than 1 year's salary.
A buyout should never be more than 1 year's salary.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 3:08 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
There is no chance the next hire's buyout will be 1 season's salary or less. That's not the market. Some comparable programs that hired new coaches in the last couple of seasons.
tu/Herman - $5.25m annual salary (.25m annual escalation). Buyout terms are $5m/season remaining on contract.
LSU/Orgeron - $3.5m. $12m buyout decreasing by year
PSU/Franklin - ~$5.5m (+escalation). Buyout: current salary X years remaining on deal
Buyouts are just the price of doing business. You can not like it all you want but no good coach is coming to A&M without such guarantees.
tu/Herman - $5.25m annual salary (.25m annual escalation). Buyout terms are $5m/season remaining on contract.
LSU/Orgeron - $3.5m. $12m buyout decreasing by year
PSU/Franklin - ~$5.5m (+escalation). Buyout: current salary X years remaining on deal
Buyouts are just the price of doing business. You can not like it all you want but no good coach is coming to A&M without such guarantees.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 3:20 pm to tmc94
How many of those were given 6 year deals?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 3:23 pm to tmc94
quote:
You can not like it all you want but no good coach is coming to A&M without such guarantees.
Somehow coaches have made this a sellers market by screaming "market rate buyout" and AD uses same line as cover
Yes, the top coach each cycle has that type of leverage like Herman at tu / LSU bidding up price. For nearly every other up and coming coach though, the chance to coach at TAMU/competitive P5 program should make them price setyet
Think of it this way
Would the following coaches who only were pursued by 1 big name reject the HC offer at a top 15--25 program over smaller buyout? Would it be a deal breaker?
-AU Gus from Arky St
-LSU Coach YawYaw from the Goonies
-UF McElwain from ColoSt
-UGA Kirby Smart from Coordinator Ranks
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 3:37 pm to GenesChin
frick it. Let’s hire Les Miles or Gene Chizik
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top



1





