Started By
Message

re: 2017 vs. 2018 team stats comparison

Posted on 9/29/18 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

2017 defensive numbers don't add up


In our first 5 games last year, we only allowed double digit rushing yards once (Arkansas) and held South Carolina to 23 yards.
Posted by slacker00
Member since Mar 2011
588 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 7:54 pm to
He's saying there is a math error.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 8:09 pm to
Fixed. Not sure how that happened.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 10/7/18 at 1:29 am to
Halfway through the season.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 10/13/18 at 7:36 pm to
Better in every single category going into the bye except even on rush offense.
This post was edited on 11/20/18 at 9:09 pm
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/13/18 at 7:49 pm to
Good to note that we are running less plays per game, both on offense and defense.

Makes the offense look even better for the total yards, and the defense not as good.

The defense is really looking good though. Helps when you’re hardly on the field.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:30 pm to
Went ahead and updated.
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 7:44 pm to
5ppg is way more than marginal
Posted by NanosTacoRun
Member since Jun 2015
2983 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

5ppg is way more than marginal

87th to 34th. Way more than marginal.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter