Started By
Message
2017 vs. 2018 team stats comparison
Posted on 9/10/18 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 9/10/18 at 10:24 pm
Updated after 11 games.
Rushing Offense (Much better even with a weaker O-line)
2017 - 168.5 yards per game
2018 - 201.1 yards per game
Rushing Defense (Significantly better even without Armani Watts in run support)
2017 - 157.4 yards per game
2018 - 82.8 yards per game
Passing Offense (Better even without Christian Kirk)
2017 - 230.9 yards per game
2018 - 259.7 yards per game
Pass Defense (Worse, but that's to be expected without Watts)
2017 - 212.0 yards per game
2018 - 261.0 yards per game
Total Offense (Much better)
2017 - 399.4 yards per game
2018 - 460.8 yards per game
Total Defense (Better, but only marginally due to the terrible secondary)
2017 - 369.4 yards per game
2018 - 343.8 yards per game
Scoring Offense (Only slightly worse because we aren't finishing)
2017 - 32.0 ppg
2018 - 31.1 ppg
Scoring Defense (Marginally better only because we're terrible at forcing turnovers)
2017 - 27.2 ppg
2018 - 22.1 ppg
Turnover Margin (worse on all counts)
2017 - 19 forced, 12 lost (+7 overall, +0.63/game)
2018 - 8 forced, 16 lost (-8 overall, -0.72/game)
Rushing Offense (Much better even with a weaker O-line)
2017 - 168.5 yards per game
2018 - 201.1 yards per game
Rushing Defense (Significantly better even without Armani Watts in run support)
2017 - 157.4 yards per game
2018 - 82.8 yards per game
Passing Offense (Better even without Christian Kirk)
2017 - 230.9 yards per game
2018 - 259.7 yards per game
Pass Defense (Worse, but that's to be expected without Watts)
2017 - 212.0 yards per game
2018 - 261.0 yards per game
Total Offense (Much better)
2017 - 399.4 yards per game
2018 - 460.8 yards per game
Total Defense (Better, but only marginally due to the terrible secondary)
2017 - 369.4 yards per game
2018 - 343.8 yards per game
Scoring Offense (Only slightly worse because we aren't finishing)
2017 - 32.0 ppg
2018 - 31.1 ppg
Scoring Defense (Marginally better only because we're terrible at forcing turnovers)
2017 - 27.2 ppg
2018 - 22.1 ppg
Turnover Margin (worse on all counts)
2017 - 19 forced, 12 lost (+7 overall, +0.63/game)
2018 - 8 forced, 16 lost (-8 overall, -0.72/game)
This post was edited on 11/20/18 at 4:30 pm
13
Posted on 9/10/18 at 10:46 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Total Defense
2017 - 446.0 yards per game
2018 - 332.0 yards per game
If Elko can keep this up, with how thin we are, he needs a really nice bonus.
Posted on 9/10/18 at 11:24 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 9/10/18 at 11:32 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Good summary of the improvement we've seen, and good observation in the similarity in schedules from year to year.
It's been really impressive how the staff and players have handled the transition, starting out at full speed. Almost every time a school goes through what we're going through, it's pretty ugly at the start.
It's been really impressive how the staff and players have handled the transition, starting out at full speed. Almost every time a school goes through what we're going through, it's pretty ugly at the start.
Posted on 9/10/18 at 11:49 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Can I get a TOP?
Posted on 9/11/18 at 1:05 am to Farmer1906
Time of Possession
2017 - 32:42
2018 - 35:43
Here's a stat we need to get much better at.
Turnover Margin
2017: +1.00 (13 Gained, 7 lost)
2018: -1.17 (2 Gained, 9 lost)
2017 - 32:42
2018 - 35:43
Here's a stat we need to get much better at.
Turnover Margin
2017: +1.00 (13 Gained, 7 lost)
2018: -1.17 (2 Gained, 9 lost)
This post was edited on 10/7/18 at 1:37 am
Posted on 9/11/18 at 7:21 am to CGSC Lobotomy
We’ve lost 3 in 2018. Vernon’s fumble, nicks fumble, and quartneys fumble.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 7:24 am to CGSC Lobotomy
I forgot the exact number but we are way down on number of plays defended from the past couple of years. I think Clemson only ran like 57 plays against us. I think that was a huge part of us being able to get Clemson off the field defensively in the 4th quarter. I also think it's going to cut down on injuries over the course of the season.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 7:53 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Wow, after the Arkansas game we should then have a really truly accurate comparison. I’m excited to see the update after the Arkansas game
Posted on 9/11/18 at 9:00 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Wow, after the Arkansas game we should then have a really truly accurate comparison. I’m excited to see the update after the Arkansas game
2018 Arkansas < 2017 Arkansas
2018 Alabama = 2017 Alabama
2018 Kentucky > 2017 Florida
2018 South Carolina <= 2017 South Carolina
2018 Mississippi State >= 2017 Mississippi State
2018 Auburn < 2017 Auburn
2018 Ole Miss < 2017 Ole Miss
2018 UAB > 2017 New Mexico
2018 LSU <= 2017 LSU
Posted on 9/11/18 at 2:14 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
So you're saying we did better against Clemson than when we had one of the biggest blown leads in college football history?
Posted on 9/11/18 at 2:19 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
So you're saying we did better against Clemson than when we had in the biggest blown lead in college football history?
FIFY
Posted on 9/11/18 at 3:08 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
FIFY
Last year was not 2006 Northwestern (led Michigan State 38-3 and lost 41-38)
Posted on 9/16/18 at 12:14 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Bama is going to wreck these stats next week. They’re on another level than Clemson.
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:27 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Alabama barely put a dent in our stats. Still IMMENSELY improved from last season and we haven't even played a terrible Arkansas team yet.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 7:21 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Numbers look good.
I would expect a 30 point win vs Pig is not more.
I would expect a 30 point win vs Pig is not more.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:33 am to Farmer1906
That rushing defense though, if we just had a couple average SEC corners this team could be great. Hopefully recruits are seeing the same thing.
Posted on 9/29/18 at 7:45 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
2017 defensive numbers don't add up
Page 1 of 2
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News