Started By
Message
re: SEC QB Recruiting
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:41 am to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:41 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I liked Chryst the best
He's my favorite as well and would be my #1 if I was doing a ranking.
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 10:42 am
0
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:44 am to crimsonian
quote:
You can't be that stupid to think that is how they do it. Ok genius, if you think that is how it is done, then why is he 5th on composite Mr. 2.33?
It's obviously not how they do it, but what's so unfair about listing the kids by their average ranking? If we do that, seems like Allen would slide into the 2 slot or 3 at worst, right?
Regardless, he's about to emerge as the undisputed best. He stole the show at the Rivals challenge and will probably do the same at the Elite 11.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:07 am to TheCheshireHog
You should have just listed the QBs without the rankings 
this one went off the rails almost immediately
The offenses are going to be fun to watch in the future. I don't know if it will change the perception but the SEC is definitely moving away from the grind it out style
this one went off the rails almost immediately The offenses are going to be fun to watch in the future. I don't know if it will change the perception but the SEC is definitely moving away from the grind it out style
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:10 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Rafe Peavey - (247) 4*, #8 Dual QB
And getting a big bump next update.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:23 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
You should have just listed the QBs without the rankings this one went off the rails almost immediately
No kidding. Not even one post in and it was done.
I mistakenly assumed that everyone would want to know how well we were all doing in the form of numbers. I'll know better next time.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:34 am to TheCheshireHog
I'm pretty sure they go by star rating. Example: 93 rating 4-star, higher than 90 rating 4-star. Where you rank in position doesn't matter.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 12:08 pm to DMagic
quote:
Twist what exactly? These rankings are inherently flawed anyway because guess what retard THEY AREN'T A PREDICATOR FOR SUCCESS.
Lol, you're the kid with no toys who says the other kids toys suck.
What the hell does your point have to do with their main purpose being the evaluation of talent? With your ignorant/stupid/idiotic point of view there would be absolutely no point (or money made) in discussion recruiting or paying for information about it.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 12:27 pm to parkjas2001
quote:We absolutely need a QB. 2 of our 4 QBs have already proven they're worthless, and the other 2 have proven nothing (and 1 only has 2 years of eligibility)
I dont think AU needs a QB in this class.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:07 pm to YStar
quote:
Lol, you're the kid with no toys who says the other kids toys suck.
That doesn't make any sense in any capacity.
quote:
What the hell does your point have to do with their main purpose being the evaluation of talent? With your ignorant/stupid/idiotic point of view there would be absolutely no point (or money made) in discussion recruiting or paying for information about it.
What the frick are you talking about? I was pointing out how stupid it was that we are having the discussion when Cheshire was trying to post a diplomatic thread and you and crimsonian shite all over it.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:24 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
I mistakenly assumed that everyone would want to know how well we were all doing in the form of numbers. I'll know better next time.
I appreciated it for one whole post.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:28 pm to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:37 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:DUDE, PARK SHOULD BE RANKED HIGHER. DON'T USE COMPOSITE YOU SUCK!!
TheCheshireHog
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:39 pm to TheCheshireHog
I actually liked the purpose of this thread but some idiots made it go in the completely wrong direction. But, yes I think it's impressive how much top tier talent the SEC is pulling at the QB position. That's what 7 National Titles in a row by a conference will do for ya.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:43 pm to TheCheshireHog
I'm sorry for arguing all up in your thread.
On topic:
If we don't land Doss(sounds like it) then I don't think we will take a QB.
On topic:
If we don't land Doss(sounds like it) then I don't think we will take a QB.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 1:51 pm to DMagic
No worries, you didn't start it.
Any talk of playing Liggins at QB if you need one?
Any talk of playing Liggins at QB if you need one?
Posted on 6/15/13 at 2:31 pm to TheCheshireHog
I highly doubt that Liggins ever plays QB here. He's just too large
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:45 pm to DMagic
quote:
you and crimsonian shite all over it.
Good thread idea, dude. Too bad others feel the need to measure e-peens.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:01 pm to TheCheshireHog
Thanks for the thread.
Bunch of dickheads in this thread, apparently.
Bunch of dickheads in this thread, apparently.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:24 pm to gatordmb89
Doss is likely to pull the trigger tomorrow. Not clear yet though whether he's being recruited as a QB.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 11:45 pm to gatordmb89
Thanks!
Just an obscene amount of talent committed right now and there are still a few more actively looking.
Just an obscene amount of talent committed right now and there are still a few more actively looking.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News