Started By
Message
re: SEC QB Recruiting
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:48 am to crimsonian
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:48 am to crimsonian
good lord, it's fine.
0
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:48 am to Maroon Flash
quote:
Do some research. Listing Kyle Allen as the #5 Pro Style prospect is screwed up
The guys who get paid to do the research say he's the #5 Pro style QB
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:49 am to Maroon Flash
quote:
Do some research. Listing Kyle Allen as the #5 Pro Style prospect is screwed up.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:49 am to parkjas2001
We had better get a QB this year. Auburn hasn't had a functional QB in a while other than Cam.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:49 am to crimsonian
quote:
By the way, most use just 247.
I agree 247 is the best but most use composite when posting about a player because its the least biased way of doing it.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:51 am to crimsonian
quote:
By the way, most use just 247.
That's probably why I'm a member of 247.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:53 am to Weagle25
quote:
most use composite when posting about a player because its the least biased way of doing it.
True story.
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 9:54 am
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:54 am to Weagle25
I disagree. Composite just adds in the horrible sites of Scout and ESPN, destroying the actual value of the recruit.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:58 am to crimsonian
Only an Alabama fan would restrict composite usage to rivals and 247. I WONDER WHY
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:59 am to crimsonian
quote:
I disagree. Composite just adds in the horrible sites of Scout and ESPN, destroying the actual value of the recruit.
I didn't say it was the best way to do it. I said least biased.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:59 am to DMagic
I don't like Rivals either, but they are better than Scout and ESPN.
Who do you think are the best evaluators?
Who do you think are the best evaluators?
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 10:01 am
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:02 am to crimsonian
There are good guys at a lot of sites that do a decent job evaluating talent. I prefer 247's layout and ranking system far above rivals or scout.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:05 am to DMagic
I am only talking about rankings, not your team guys or articles. The way I see it, if you think 247 is the best at ranking players, then if you go by composite, you like your rankings watered down.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:06 am to crimsonian
And yes the SEC has great QB's. 
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:06 am to Weagle25
quote:
I said least biased.
Considering on the first page alone you have a Bama fan upset that it isn't 247's rankings and an A&M fan upset that it isn't Rivals rankings, it seems blatantly obvious why you would use the composite ranking on a website such as this.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:08 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Considering on the first page alone you have a Bama fan upset that it isn't 247's rankings and an A&M fan upset that it isn't Rivals rankings, it seems blatantly obvious why you would use the composite ranking on a website such as this.
That's my point. I think 247 is best but since its so varied on here, the best one to post is the composite.
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 10:09 am
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:08 am to TheCheshireHog
You forgot to mention the 247 ranking of Allen was better as well, so once again Scout and ESPN bringing them down.
As in #4 QB.
As in #4 QB.
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 10:12 am
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:09 am to Weagle25
He was agreeing with you
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:11 am to crimsonian
quote:
You forgot to mention the 247 ranking of Allen was better as well, so once again Scout and ESPN bringing them down.
Cornwell is the #1 QB on ESPN.
Kyle Allen is the #1 QB on Scout
Posted on 6/15/13 at 10:12 am to TheCheshireHog
And those mean absolutely nothing. They suck.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News