Started By
Message

re: 2013 Auburn Recruiting Thread: Commits, Visits, Hot Prospects, etc...

Posted on 7/24/12 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92794 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

It's probably because the NCAA didn't even investigate PSU. All they had to do was come up with the sanctions.
Penn State must've been doing some illegal shite, because you're right. NCAA didn't even investigate and PSU was OK with the sanctions. It could've gotten much worse, IMO.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
14220 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

I forgot about Miami. How'd PSU get an NCAA ruling before they did?
The NCAA and Emmert does what they want. I guess the FBI had enough evidence that the NCAA didn't have to investigate.
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 9:48 pm
Posted by TheSandman
Waffle House
Member since Nov 2010
19515 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

I guess the FBI had enough evidence that the NCAA didn't have to investigate.

This.

The NCAA decided that the Freeh Report (being an internal investigation) was enough evidence to proceed with and didn't bother with a hearing. They made PSU sign something saying that they were okay with it and waived their right to appeal.
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17231 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:13 pm to
They had like a full report of what happened. The PSU board hired an outside party. There was pretty much no need for an investigation. That's why they acted so quick.
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41869 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

It's probably because the NCAA didn't even investigate PSU


Probably because the Freeh Report did all the investigation for them.
Posted by kage
ATL
Member since Feb 2010
4068 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Penn State must've been doing some illegal shite



quote:

I guess the FBI had enough evidence that the NCAA didn't have to investigate.



Seriously? Have you not paid any attention to this whole thing?

In short, Penn St didn't actually even break any NCAA rules. The NCAA said the issue at hand was so one a kind, for lack of better words, that they felt they had to do something. I thought they should have stayed out of it all together, because it's a criminal issue, and the NCAA has never enforced any kind of penalty for a criminal issue, but that's an argument for another thread.

They didn't do an investigation. The info they went on was from the Freeh report, which was done by Louis Freeh, who used to be the head of the FBI from 93-01. From what I've read, it's been speculated that the NCAA wanted to give them the death penalty, but Penn St said we'll agree to whatever penalty you give us, and not protest the decision, if you don't do that. The current Penn St president said it was unanimous amongst the Penn St administration and trustees, but some trustees have said they had no input. Needless to say, it's pretty bad situation for everyone involved in this whole thing.


back to cruitin...
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 10:21 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108528 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:25 pm to
Frick Penn St, and that shithead joepa.

I am excited about our 2013 class.
Posted by Autiger4lyfe
Bama
Member since Jun 2009
1137 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:29 pm to
I was more of a bobby bowden fan myself
Posted by Stanky Legg
Member since Sep 2010
4052 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

In short, Penn St didn't actually even break any NCAA rules


You could argue, and probably rightfully so, that they violated 10.01.1: Ethical conduct. It's fairly ambiguous and is written in a way that they can consider anything unethical.

Bottom line, they didn't do what they should have done. They didn't do it because they didn't want the negative attention and any fallout for the football program. By insulating themselves from a problem they SHOULD have dealt with, they gave themselves an unfair opportunity to recruit players who might have otherwise not considered them.

It's a dotted line and definitely indirect, but they have no one to blame but themselves.
Posted by kage
ATL
Member since Feb 2010
4068 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

You could argue, and probably rightfully so, that they violated 10.01.1: Ethical conduct. It's fairly ambiguous and is written in a way that they can consider anything unethical.

Bottom line, they didn't do what they should have done. They didn't do it because they didn't want the negative attention and any fallout for the football program. By insulating themselves from a problem they SHOULD have dealt with, they gave themselves an unfair opportunity to recruit players who might have otherwise not considered them.

It's a dotted line and definitely indirect, but they have no one to blame but themselves


I won't argue against the fact that they completely failed to do what they should have done, but I personally don't think they violated the spirit of the rule. It went far beyond just the football team, imo.

I, and many other folks, think the precedent they've now set where they have ruled on something criminal, which they've never done before, is a little scary. I just think the NCAA overstepped their boundaries.
Posted by Stanky Legg
Member since Sep 2010
4052 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

I, and many other folks, think the precedent they've now set where they have ruled on something criminal,


The ruling wasn't based on the crime of child molestation.

It was based on covering up the crime to benefit the football program.

Big difference.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44216 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:46 pm to
Don Jones, the NCAA attorney out of Montgomery, basically said all the same things the other day on Fbaum. That guy nailed the Cam Newton case and he seemed to nail this PSU stuff too.

Saw something about Ricky Seals-Jones. What's the deal on that kid? We have a legit shot?
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108528 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:48 pm to
Auburn has made a push for him and he might come visit AU. Long shot at best right now. Coaches are working this one though.
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 10:55 pm
Posted by AMM AU9893
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2011
13789 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Penn State must've been doing some illegal shite, because you're right. NCAA didn't even investigate and PSU was OK with the sanctions
Well how bad would it sound for Penn St to say, "No, we shouldn't get sanctions for allowing children to be molested." Part of it is PR, it looks terrible to argue against any ruling. They want to move past this whole thing
Posted by AMM AU9893
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2011
13789 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Saw something about Ricky Seals-Jones. What's the deal on that kid? We have a legit shot?

He has a top 3 of Texas, aTm, and LSU. We contacted him and want him to visit. It's a long shot IMO
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92794 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Saw something about Ricky Seals-Jones. What's the deal on that kid? We have a legit shot?
quote:

He has a top 3 of Texas, aTm, and LSU. We contacted him and want him to visit. It's a long shot IMO
I read that he didn't look very special at the latest camp, IIRC. Either way, I doubt Auburn is on his radar.
Posted by AMM AU9893
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2011
13789 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

I read that he didn't look very special at the latest camp
From The Opening:
quote:

Like Treadwell, Ricky Seals-Jones proved to one of the best big receivers on hand. While he may not ultimately play wide receiver, he showed the ability to dominate on high-point, 50-50 balls, and the open field speed to maximize receptions. Texas, Texas A&M and LSU are in contention for the talented Texan.
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 11:17 pm
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92794 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:20 pm to
I'm going to have to dig, but I definitely heard he wasn't as impressive as his ranking.

I've never seen film on him or anything, so I can't say what I actually think of him. I just know he's a big, big kid. He was orginally commited to Texas, correct?
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4557 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

quote:
It's probably because the NCAA didn't even investigate PSU


Probably because the Freeh Report did all the investigation for them.



Didn't Yahoo do all the investigation for the NCAA for the Miami case?

Make no mistake, the PSU stuff landed with the quickness purely for PR matters.
Posted by AMM AU9893
Auburn, AL
Member since Feb 2011
13789 posts
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

I've never seen film on him or anything, so I can't say what I actually think of him. I just know he's a big, big kid. He was orginally commited to Texas, correct?

Yeah, he was. Maybe you're thinking of Tyrone Swoopes, the QB/ATH committed to Texas who really struggled in camps this summer. But you should check out RSJ's film, he's a HS Vince Young running the ball
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 11:28 pm
first pageprev pagePage 464 of 601Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter