Started By
Message
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:00 pm to TexasAg13
If you actually learned anything you could clearly see. Yall need to recruit better especially at db and tailback, yall secondary sucks, you need a better tailback rotation, and yall o line needs to hit the weight room. Jimbo is recruiting better so far than Sumlin but can he keep it up to stack the talent? Talent and depth is huge in winning big, Saban even stressed that...
This post was edited on 9/23/18 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:01 pm to TexasAg13
quote:
Show continued progress under Jimbo, prove we can stop the run, but have a result that will hopefully continue the SEC’s national reputation as the top conference. Whether we like it or not, Bama represents all of us and we need them to continue carrying the flag
Son, I don't believe I'd of said that outloud.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:01 pm to TexasAg13
quote:
No way A&M has the ability to hire someone like Jimbo without the SEC revenue, which has been directly tied to Bama’s success
But I thought aggy was the world's most valuable college football program?
Or was that based on a flawed study that's simplistically focused on one-time revenue and false "profits" from a major fundraising drive to rebuild a stadium? Not even considering that the aggy AD chief financial officer said you really broke even, or lost a little money, either.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:04 pm to Smart Post
quote:
Or was that based on a flawed study that's simplistically focused on one-time revenue and false "profits" from a major fundraising drive to rebuild a stadium? Not even considering that the aggy AD chief financial officer said you really broke even, or lost a little money, either.

Don’t look now, but your Randolph Duke is showing.
So salty.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:07 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
can be happy about not getting thrashed
Bama was up 30 or so when they pulled their starters in the 3rd. They probably would have won by 45 if they had left Tua in.
I would hate to see the Aggie definition of a bad loss.
If AU loses to bama like Aggie did yesterday the AU melt will be a Cat 5.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:07 pm to randomways
LOL
Playing a tough half? What the frick is wrong with you people? Idiots, I swear.
Playing a tough half? What the frick is wrong with you people? Idiots, I swear.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:08 pm to EKG
It's all true, honey. NCAA accounting standards allow counting the stadium contributions as revenue, but not as an expense, thus inflating profit.
Jeff Toole said without those one-time contributions, your AD broke even, "or maybe lost a little."
Jeff Toole said without those one-time contributions, your AD broke even, "or maybe lost a little."
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:09 pm to TexasAg13
keep reminding yourself that ya'll owe him 75 million !
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:09 pm to TexasAg13
Beat the spread baby steps
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:10 pm to Smart Post
this is hilarious, coming from a fan of the program that uses the erwin center and several govt accounting methods all so that they can claim the mythical revenue title every year
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:11 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Tua is just that good. Bama already has playmakers but when you add a qb like tua it just makes it even harder. Ohio state is the only team i can see giving bama fits. Uga is too young this year. OSU is the only safe bet.
This post was edited on 9/23/18 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:12 pm to TexasAg13
Shiny hook, hook is shiny
and still caught a few

Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:12 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Bad loss = losing in Jordan-Hare or to South Carolina...thing we simply do not do.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:14 pm to Smart Post
Your patronizing tone, while noted (/headpat), is wasted on me.
It’s a message board, Randy.
Don’t forget to breathe a little while tilting at those maroon windmills.

It’s a message board, Randy.
Don’t forget to breathe a little while tilting at those maroon windmills.

Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:15 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Well we covered the spread and played better against them than anyone else they've played all year. So I wouldn't call it a bad loss. Especially since we all expected to lose.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:16 pm to TexasAg13
WTF are you writing. The result was predictable, not ideal.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:17 pm to Uncle Gunnysack
quote:
this is hilarious, coming from a fan of the program that uses the erwin center and several govt accounting methods all so that they can claim the mythical revenue title every year
We all use the same accounting reporting methods, dumbass.
Any link to this claim, by the way?
Here's mine, linked.
quote:
When schools borrow money to build or refurbish athletics facilities, the NCAA currently requires them to count annual debt service payments — the amount of principal and interest they repay in a given year — as an operational expense. Cash spending on facilities is supposed to be counted, and reported, separately from annual operating expenses.
As a result, contributions to Texas A&M’s athletics program that were made in 2017 and spent on facilities projects that year are being reported as operating revenue while most of the corresponding spending on those projects is not being reported as an annual operating expense.
The Texas A&M athletics department’s chief financial officer, Jeff Toole, told USA TODAY Sports that when the facilities-related contributions are removed from consideration for 2017, “we are basically break-even, maybe a little less than break-even, for the year.”
LINK
This post was edited on 9/23/18 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 4:22 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
RA: Randolph Duke spam
LOL, you're a putz.
Back to top
