Started By
Message

re: would you revamp college overitme.

Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by WeagleEagle
Folsom Prison
Member since Sep 2011
2462 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:24 pm to
I like # 2.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 7:26 pm
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21167 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:25 pm to
its kind of like that for the playoffs starting this year if team A kicks a FG then team B gets a chance, but if team A scores a TD then game over.
Posted by sharpSee
Hail Statement
Member since Oct 2011
6098 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Im not a fan of the score first in the NFL.


I thought they added a rule so that the other team has a chance to score if they have yet to have possession of the ball.

ETA: nm that's just post-season play.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 7:27 pm
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66899 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

start at the 50.

So, on 4th and 10 from the fifty , you must go for it?
Posted by WeagleEagle
Folsom Prison
Member since Sep 2011
2462 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:26 pm to
Just for the playoffs...I think
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:28 pm to
didn't surprise me and i was fine with the idea, but the execution was horrendous. he is getting a good bit of heat here now and rightfully so. they have really fricked this year up and i hope they enjoy julio because they mortgaged our future on the 2nd best WR with brick hands and a propensity to the IR. he's jerrious norwood but this time we paid so much more. fricking idiots.
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6870 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:28 pm to
I wish each team got the ball at the 50. Would make it a little tougher to score
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28147 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:29 pm to
Yeah I'd rather have a full 8 minutes of play with 4th qtr rules in effect.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:29 pm to
nah id just move it back to the 35. going back to ties is fricking retarded and might be one of the dumbest ideas i have ever seen.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101052 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:33 pm to
I'd like to see it from the 50.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:34 pm to
Start on the 10, require 2 pt conversion after 1st overtime.No first downs.. one chance to score and win it in OT.

If tied after two overtimes.. borrow a page from hockey.

Each kicker gets a kick, starting from the 15. If both make it, the next kick goes from the 20. If both make that, the next moves another 5 yds back, and so on and so forth until there is a winner. Might even do this after one overtime. Might make folks go for 2 to win then.
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 7:37 pm
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28147 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Each kicker gets a kick, starting from the 15. If both make it, the next kick goes from the 20. If both make that, the next moves another 5 yds back, and so on and so forth until there is a winner. Might even do this after one overtime. Might make folks go for 2 to win then.


Very interesting...
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:37 pm to
would maybe prevent teams from having injured players from being on the field so long and punishing them for the next game for having to play so long.
Posted by GumpsRus
Alabama
Member since Oct 2010
271 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:43 pm to
How bout going back to the way it use to be. A Tie.
Posted by akahogfan
DC
Member since Nov 2010
243 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

borrow a page from hockey.

Could just have a two-point conversion shoot out. After the 1st overtime, start at the 3. One play to score then move to defense.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:47 pm to
that'd work too. Just figured would make ST's a bigger factor, since both offenses and defenses had 4 qtrs to get it done, and it'd be less wear and tear on skill players and they wouldn't go into the next game too worn down.
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3933 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 8:03 pm to
Leave it as is, except start from the 40.
Posted by RT58
Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
4224 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 8:16 pm to
I don't see a problem with just adding 15 minutes to the game,extra quarter. Whoever is ahead then.If at end of 15 minutes the game is still tied,then makem start at the 50 and earn the shite.
Posted by Crbello4Hiceman
Lurking
Member since May 2011
502 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 8:28 pm to
I'm ok with it the way it is. At the most extreme, move teams back to the 50. The only problem with that is the first team to play would not have pressure on them to get a TD since they are alot more likely to even keep a team out of field goal range IMHO.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter