Started By
Message
re: Would you like to see an IB rematch in the MNC?
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:58 am to TreyAnastasio
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:58 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
TreyAnastasio
Of all the tears yours have been the sweetest.
0
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:59 am to Tigerfan53
quote:This.
Nope Bama doesn't need a mulligan every year
Win the conference, play for a MNC.
It was a mistake the last time.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:59 am to omrebelfan20
frick no
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:01 am to Crimson1st
quote:
Alabama proved that aside from a once in a lifetime sequence of freakisms they basically beat AU.
Never go full gump.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:06 am to dante
quote:
I'd take AJ in the clutch against anyone based off of all the times he has stepped up for us.
Nick Marshall has more clutch drives this year than AJ has his entire career.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:08 am to RandySavage
While true, I would attribute this to AJ typically being out of the game by halftime.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:10 am to NashvilleTN
quote:Fast forward 370 days. You don't think the committee would see Alabama as one of the top 4 after the championship games?
This.
Win the conference, play for a MNC.
It was a mistake the last time.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:11 am to BamaDoc14
quote:
While true, I would attribute this to AJ typically being out of the game by halftime.
Which is what happens when your defense allows about 7 points a game.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:14 am to Diamondawg
quote:I think the committee will HEAVILY favor conference champions. Otherwise why do away with the computer rankings and just use the top 4 in the BCS standings.
You don't think the committee would see Alabama as one of the top 4 after the championship games?
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:17 am to RandySavage
quote:
Which is what happens when your defense allows about 7 points a game.
AU 38.6 pts/game
UA 38.8 pts/game
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:19 am to dante
quote:Then this stupid system will be 8 teams within 2 years.
I think the committee will HEAVILY favor conference champions. Otherwise why do away with the computer rankings and just use the top 4 in the BCS standings.
So Duke could play for the national championship?
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 11:21 am
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:20 am to boddagetta
quote:
Alabama proved that aside from a once in a lifetime sequence of freakisms they basically beat AU.
quote:
Never go full gump.
LOL! I didn't go FULL gump. I gave Auburn credit for the win and congratulated them as well...of course a true dyed in the wool gumpster wouldn't allow themselves to say/type those words!
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:23 am to Diamondawg
quote:Not likely, BUT if they beat FSU they would be the ONLY team to beat the #1 ranked team on a neutral site. Hmmm.
So Duke could play for the national championship?
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:32 am to allin2010
quote:
When the first game is close then Rematches heavily favor the loser..... Would rather play FSU
The 2003 and 2010 SEC Championships show that the team that won the first match can crush their opponent in a rematch.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 12:18 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Californians wouldn't know what the frick hit them with those two fanbases walking around.
Holy shite, I hadn't even thought of that aspect.
Holy shite, I hadn't even thought of that aspect.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News