Started By
Message
re: Would Bama have beaten LSU's non-Bama opponents?
Posted on 12/22/11 at 12:47 pm to Adam Banks
Posted on 12/22/11 at 12:47 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Meh I think our best win is oregon. Just because yall played a shitty schedule doesnt mean yall are better. They are actually a division and conference champion.
I hate it when people say Bama isn't better just because they didn't play anyone OOC other than Penn State, which isn't much. Bama would've destroyed every team LSU destroyed. Look at margin of victory against similar opponents.
3
Posted on 12/22/11 at 12:57 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
The Oregon speed and tempo might have given bama more trouble than it did LSU because LSU is faster at LB and rotates more depth in the defense. I don't think it is a given that bama wins this game. It's not a good matchup for bama.
I would pick 'Bama by three in that matchup on a neutral field; The Ducks were the only team all year that matched up with LSU's speed, though in the end they were a half-step slow.
Posted on 12/22/11 at 1:56 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
I hate it when people say Bama isn't better just because they didn't play anyone OOC other than Penn State, which isn't much. Bama would've destroyed every team LSU destroyed. Look at margin of victory against similar opponents
Yall match up terribly with oregon. Oregon would expose yalls large slow linebackers.
Posted on 12/22/11 at 6:56 pm to bama1989
quote:
quote:
Here is a more relevant comparison. Head to head results between LSU and Bama.
In the last 15 meetings between these teams, LSU has 10 wins against the Crimson Tide.
You're like AU fans. You go back just far enough where the data suits you. The only statistic historically that has meaning is the total wins/losses between our 2 great schools. The all time record Bama leads LSU 45-25 with 5 ties.
You go back as far as you like and keep hoping against hope you beat us soon. The last 15 years is very relevant to me personally because it's the beginning of sharing LSU football with my 4 children
Posted on 12/22/11 at 6:59 pm to bama1989
quote:
quote:
Here is a more relevant comparison. Head to head results between LSU and Bama.
In the last 15 meetings between these teams, LSU has 10 wins against the Crimson Tide.
You're like AU fans. You go back just far enough where the data suits you. The only statistic historically that has meaning is the total wins/losses between our 2 great schools. The all time record Bama leads LSU 45-25 with 5 ties.
You go back as far as you like and keep hoping against hope you beat us soon. The last 15 years is very relevant to me personally because it's the beginning of sharing LSU football with my 4 children
Posted on 12/22/11 at 10:12 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Bama would've destroyed every team LSU destroyed
Deserves repetition of this post.
quote:
How quickly you gumps forget your 1st game of the season.
Yea, I can see gumps destroying UO with 4 INTs, and a fumble, along with the shitty ST play.
You had 7 TOs in 1st 3 games and beat your chest thinking you were on LSU's level?.
gtfo with your delusional bs.
Posted on 12/22/11 at 11:33 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
Would Bama be favored against these opponenets?
Oregon - yes
Northwestern - yes
MSU - beat 'em worse than Lester did
WV Mountaineers - yes
Kentucky - LOL
UF - softened 'em up for Lester
UT - pounded 'em
AU - pounded 'em
WKU Hilltoppers -
Ole Miss - heppin' Nutt pack
Arky - beatdown
UGA - yes
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.
All you folks who want to act like LSU is some conquering army which headed into the Hinterlands to pillage all challengers, while Bama just barely squeeked by an easy schedule can suck it.
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten...not 1.
Could they have beaten all of them? Probably. As convincingly, especially Oregon? Doubtful. I highly doubt that Bama would have doubled the score on the Ducks in the final minute of the game.
Now, let's flip this and see what LSU would likely have done to Bama's OOC opponents...
Kent State, North Texas and Georgia Southern? Child, PLEASE.
Penn State? By the time that the Tigers D was done with them, those fellas would felt like they'd spent a day in the shower with Sandusky.
If only you hadn't lost on November 5th...tsk tsk
Posted on 12/23/11 at 12:35 am to FTBLFN
quote:
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten...not 1
Please rename this thread to "The Bama insecurity thread"
Beating three teams with winning records gave you that much confidence?
Posted on 12/23/11 at 1:04 am to FTBLFN
LSU Actually played those games. You played patty cake with the autistic kids.
Enjoy your experience in New Orleans.
We certainly will.
Enjoy your experience in New Orleans.
We certainly will.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 4:13 pm to faxis
It doesnt matter if you think you would have beat our opponents cause ur schedule sucked ,you gave up 21 points to Ga southern and 14 to auburn .Get real and keep drinking that Bammer Jammer Kool-AidFool 
Posted on 12/23/11 at 4:16 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
FTBLFN
you are possibly the worst fricking Alabama poster on this site. You probably suck at life. I bet your mother wishes she had agreed to swallow.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 4:17 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Look at margin of victory against similar opponents.
ours was better you retarded frick.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 5:16 pm to FTBLFN
but didn't they lose to LSU at home?
Posted on 12/23/11 at 5:21 pm to FTBLFN
LSU would have beat every team on the schedule of every BCS champion since the BCS began and are, therefore, as good as every one of them.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:03 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
FTBLFN
poor human
This post was edited on 12/23/11 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:05 pm to EastBankTiger
quote:
Penn State? By the time that the Tigers D was done with them, those fellas would felt like they'd spent a day in the shower with Sandusky.
too soon.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 7:40 pm to coolmonk
quote:
but didn't they lose to LSU at home?
They don't live in the same reality as the rest of us. They have a better loss than LSU; that's really all that matters.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 9:51 pm to FTBLFN
With your soft arse schedule, we only have a guess. All we really know is (1) Bama could beat Kent State, North Texas, and Georgia Southern and (2) couldn't beat LSU at home.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 10:01 pm to dunkelman
The updykes really prefer the "eyeball test" instead of actually scheduling teams with a pulse.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 11:11 pm to drexyl
Lol stupid op is stupid
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News