re: WLOCP or Iron Bowl

quote:

---

That's easy, the WLOCP is leaps and bounds better than the iron bowl. Location, atmosphere, camping all week, split stadium, everyone has all their teeth etc......

---

I've said ti once and I will say it again. They are both great rivalries and have great traditions.

We (Georgia and Florida) will always prefer WLOCP and they (Auburn and Alabama) will always prefer the Iron Bowl.

It's hard to go wrong with either.

quote:

---

He did say a winning record, though.

---

He wasn't implying 1-1 either. He was being dishonest, and many of the dumb fricks here will buy it. Just like the Vanderbilt narrative guys like him like to vomit. We've lost 2 games to Vanderbilt since 1955. Those two losses belonged to a coach who would be fired that same year.
Our 5 losses in a row to the east were to #5,#10,#5,#2 teams, UGA being three of those. No excuse for the UT loss.

quote:

---

BOTH teams have played for multiple National Championships in the last 10 years? So, you are saying that Auburn has played for multiple National Championships in the last 10 years? Hmm. I must have missed some of them.

---

Check out this moron...

quote:

---

He wasn't implying 1-1 either. He was being dishonest,

---

Always a possibility. I tend to take people at their word until it is plain they are trolling. That makes me dumber, not smarter, by the way.

quote:

---

Just like the Vanderbilt narrative guys like him like to vomit. We've lost 2 games to Vanderbilt since 1955.

---

See? Obvious troll. I doubt anybody would take it seriously that Vanderbilt is a better football school than Auburn, though.

quote:

---

Our 5 losses in a row to the east were to #5,#10,#5,#2 teams, UGA being three of those. No excuse for the UT loss.

---

The Tennessee loss was a tough one. Shoot, we let South Carolina get us last year. I hate playing teams that are struggling. Fans, players and coaches tend to take them lightly, and then they sneak up on you.

quote:

---

Check out this moron...

---

English a second language? I already gave the definition of multiple, and it means more than two. Go ahead and look it up.....moron.

ETA
Since you probably don't know what a dictionary is, let me help you.

mul·ti·ple
/'m?lt?p?l/

adjective

1. having or involving several parts, elements, or members: "multiple occupancy"

Note it says several parts? Lets look up "several" now.

sev·er·al
/'sev(?)r?l/

determiner

1. more than two but not many:

Wait! What does it say? more than two?

Moron.

ETAA

I'll go one step further. He also said Multiple national Championships. Moron.

I don't attack unless I am attacked. I may be a lot of things, but I am not a moron.

quote:

---

AU is 1-4 in Bryant Denny since 2010. The average score is 43-21 in favor of Alabama so the guy who said Bama by 3 TDs is not far off.

---

Could it happen? Definitely yes. I'm sure Alabama would love to get some payback after last year. But I would never count Auburn out. It is a huge mistake to ever assume a win against Auburn. Also, I wouldn't count on past games to give any kind of hint to what a current game will look like. I've never understood the thing about "I have averaged the past 10 games scores up and that means we will win by......"

I am pretty sure that is not the way football works.

quote:

---

I already gave the definition of multiple, and it means more than two. Go ahead and look it up.....moron.

---

Webster seems to be fine with the “more than one” definition.

Fine. We will go with your definition, then. (Even though multiple is the more correct when talking about 3 or more imo, because you would typically say "a pair" or "a couple" when talking about two.)

Now explain away the multiple National Championships that Auburn has had in the last 10 years.
And we can use your definition if you would like.

ETA
I should say that I have no problem with you, Nino. At least you didn't enter a conversation by calling me a moron. (And, no. I don't want to know what you were thinking about me.)