Started By
Message
re: Will Saban kick Cam Robinson off the team?
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:18 am to 14&Counting
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:18 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Drugs - a little weed Guns - a ghetto piece
Agree on the weed, but it's still a drug charge.
About the gun, do you know what kind it is? Does it really matter what kind it is? If he stole it, and he can shoot and kill someone with it, it's kinda of a big deal.
If you don't think it is, why don't you prove it's no biggie by standing 5 feet away from the barrel end, while Robinson pulls the trigger?
If it was not effective, while steal it and keep it under his car seat?
1
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:23 am to ChexMix
quote:
Will Saban kick Cam Robinson off the team?
Hell no. That's why Saban enforces the buddy system during the offseason. That way when they frick up, there's a fall guy. In this scenario, Hootie is the the guy to take the fall. He's known his job since he was recruited.
Thank you Hootie for your contribution. You'll be greatly missed.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:26 am to ChexMix
quote:
you wish. Bama lost waay too much this year not to feel it. I wouldnt be surprised if USC beat yall right out of the gate
Ahahahhhahahahhahaha
You're clearly moderately challenged. Keep posting.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:31 am to ChexMix
Cam? 
Hootie - processed
Hootie - processed
Posted on 5/18/16 at 8:22 am to ChexMix
At least they didn't steal an EMPTY safe, right??
Posted on 5/18/16 at 8:45 am to NFLSU
quote:
Stolen gun taken across state lines
Knowledge of it being stolen is the burden of proof on the state. This will get plead down to a misdemeanor, probation, yada yada. He will sit a few games.
It's shady and sucks, but that's what will happen.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 8:54 am to sawfiddle
quote:This is about right.....barners and coonasses, get over it.
Knowledge of it being stolen is the burden of proof on the state. This will get plead down to a misdemeanor, probation, yada yada. He will sit a few games.
It's shady and sucks, but that's what will happen.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 8:58 am to sawfiddle
quote:
Knowledge of it being stolen is the burden of proof on the state.
No, it's not...
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:04 am to ChexMix
quote:
Personally, i doubt it. Maybe a two game suspension at most.
Probably not if the charges are plead down to a misdemeanor and he didn't actually steal the gun.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:10 am to SammyTiger
Nah man.. A ghetto piece
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:11 am to StopRobot
For the billionth time- it doesn't matter if he stole it or not if he was in possession of it.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:13 am to Shakita Bonita
It does matter.. not by the definitions of the statute, but as to how the DA proceeds.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:17 am to sawfiddle
thats so vague he's in possession of a stolen firearm, the DA will proceed accordingly
he's in possession of a stolen firearm, the DA will proceed accordingly Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:21 am to Shakita Bonita
Yeah, it's vague. That's how these things work. Ambiguity is the backbone of the American legal system.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:22 am to Shakita Bonita
quote:
Shakita Bonita
Why are you melting so hard over this?
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:25 am to sawfiddle
For the millionth time, ignorance as to its stolen status is an AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. The DA does not have to show that he knew it was stolen, CRob has to show that he didn't know it was stolen.
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 10:26 am
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:26 am to Shakita Bonita
quote:
he's in possession of a stolen firearm, the DA will proceed accordingly
Nahhh...he didn't know it was stolen....honest mistake anyone could make...and little weed? c'mon man.....DA has better things to do.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:27 am to Shakita Bonita
quote:You done broke out into a sweat over this, bruh!..this is no melt, it's a sizzle.
thats so vague he's in possession of a stolen firearm, the DA will proceed accordingly
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:28 am to sawfiddle
quote:
Knowledge of it being stolen is the burden of proof on the state
Yep, it's the state's burden.
To obtain a conviction for illegal possession of a stolen firearm, the State has to prove that the defendant intentionally possessed the firearm, that it was the subject of a robbery or theft, and that the defendant knew or should have known that the firearm was the subject of a robbery or theft. State v. Powe, App. 4 Cir.2014, 145 So.3d 583, 2014-0137 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/16/14).
* full disclosure - I don't practice criminal law...only civil.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:28 am to wdeagle
Not much will become of this. He will say he didn't even know the gun was there. Who's car were they driving?
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News