Why not just roll with the BCS computer rankings

G5 schools get butthurt that it’s based off of facts and not feelings

Less drama and less money. That’s why

Its interesting how it turns out exactly like DEI- a "seat at the table" turns into being held to a lower set of standards and getting fast tracked over more deserving teams.

I dont know how anyone could have listened to the show on espn yesterday where everyone on there was complaining how james madison and tulane were unfairly getting into the playoffs and not instantly think about how the same logic applies to what corporations have been doing with hiring minority candidates.

quote:

---

Its interesting how it turns out exactly like DEI- a "seat at the table" turns into being held to a lower set of standards and getting fast tracked over more deserving teams.

---

Last year it gave us Boise as a freaking 3-seed with a bye (which gave Penn State an easy win in round 2).

Now this year we get two group of 5 teams. At least it prevented ND from waltzing in with their trash schedule.

From a prior post on this, I was told that all the computers used in the past measured different categories.

But I agree with the idea that they replace the “opinion factor” with math.

G5 needs their own playoffs. Midweek games in the Holidays that matter.

quote:

---

Less drama and less money. That’s why

---

So, you enjoy all the arguing over “who’s better than who”?

quote:

---

And let the chips fall where they may? And in doing so, eliminate the two pie in the sky DEI slots, also.

---

The NCAA is a notoriously pro-DEI slanted institution because it is governed by insufferably woke member institutions' Presidents as a voting body.

The ADs, when they do have any say so, (which is rarely), are instructed how to plan and vote by their Presidents and Boards and, at times, even their State's governors if the States are providing any funding whatsoever.

That how it was first established that most flagship and other major universities within a given state are now required to schedule one in state lesser subdivision program each season (where such programs exist) providing those schools with major paydays.

It is, in essence, socialism and redistribution of wealth.

That's why the playoffs were approved ... provided the non-P5 conferences were awarded/afforded slots.

It's all very counterproductive.

Yep 12 teams is a good number if we get rid of DEI autobids

Let's go to 16 teams and NO AQs, at all. 8 first-round home games and no byes. If a G5/6, or ND is in top 16 of CFP Rankings, they get in, but just take the top 16!