Started By
Message

re: Who are the Blue Blood football programs?

Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:31 am to
Posted by Faurot fodder
Member since Jul 2019
6597 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:31 am to
I normally do not condone smugness, but when that smugness is directed towards other smug folk, I'm fine with it. Carry on.
Posted by rtr23242526
Member since Dec 2022
3295 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:34 am to
Spot on
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15729 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Screaming about recent national championships just shows you don’t know what the phrase means.



Correct. Blue Blood has no recency bias
Posted by AulderMagee
Dallas
Member since Mar 2024
3087 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:38 am to
quote:

What are the qualifications?


Not being Missouri is a good start.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Screaming about recent national championships just shows you don’t know what the phrase means.


Texas claims 4 championships but really it's 3 and 1 co-championship. LSU has 4 championships. (Their was nothing "co-" about 2003 )

LSU also has more Heisman winners.

quote:

LSU was not at the table when the badges were given out, but you’ve done well lately and we’re proud of you.


It's really about win %. LSU had a bad 80's and 90's. Texas had a great run through the 50's, 60's & 70's. It's not even a question if LSU has been more relevant in college football in the last 25 years.

Losing seasons since 2000:
LSU - 1
Texas - 5
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Correct. Blue Blood has no recency bias


What officially makes one a blue blood?
Posted by Archibald
Member since Apr 2024
1979 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Their was nothing "co-" about 2003
quote:

Their
quote:

It's really about win %. LSU had a bad 80's and 90's. Texas had a great run through the 50's, 60's & 70's. It's not even a question if LSU has been more relevant in college football in the last 25 years.
Texas was the winningest power conference program in the 2000s. Try again.

This topic seems to really upset you
Posted by TN Tygah
Member since Nov 2023
7837 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:46 am to
Yes, the blue blood conversation is dumb. I've never understood why Texas is included on that list. 1 natty in 42 years is embarrassing. That's like pre-Saban LSU. It seems like media coverage / regional vs national appeal has more to do with it. It also helps if they made a movie about your team (Rudy).

Michigan is a blue blood mostly because they're rivals with Ohio State.

Nebraska shouldn't even be in the conversation anymore.

LSU was actually ranked higher on that list than I thought we would be. But honestly, since 2000, other than LSU I think only Bama has 3 or more championships.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15729 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:48 am to
quote:

What officially makes one a blue blood?



Program wins and/or national titles across multiple decades.

This post was edited on 7/9/24 at 10:51 am
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Their was nothing "co-" about 2003

I ain't changing shite.

quote:

Texas was the winningest power conference program in the 2000s. Try again.


Right. Win %. And then 1 championship. That's what I said.
Posted by SoonerKA1999
T-Town
Member since Aug 2021
1435 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I will say this for Texas, you ushered in the beginning of the end of the big red machine, when you upset them in the inaugural Big XII championship game in St Louis. Good work.


Oh so OU knocking them out in Red October in 2000 and in multiple Big12 Championships years after wasn't the true beginning of their downfall? Think harder.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Program wins and/or national titles across multiple decades.


Which brings me back to Texas. They won titles in '63 & '69. The '70 title was a UPI co-championship in a season where they played 2 teams with winning records.

They racked up wins in the shitty SWC:
Baylor
Houston
Rice
SMU
A&M
TCU
Texas Tech

Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
60706 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Who are the Blue Blood football programs?


1% of D1 would be good sign
#1 in their region would be a good sign

USA / East = Notre Dame
South = Alabama
Midwest = Ohio State
Southwest = Oklahoma
West = Notre Dame

Utx is #3 behind #1 Oklahoma and #2 Nebraska
Utx has 4 MNC's, about6 the same as Georgia Tech and nobody calls the Bumbles a Blue Blood
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
14222 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:06 am to
Do you not know how to use an internet search browser?
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
25054 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:07 am to
I don't think USC should be #1 as they are weighing a lot of things post college to get there.

I don't think Pro Bowlers or HOFers should matter much in the discussion of who is a college blue blood.

USC and ND would be there anyway but probably lower
Posted by Archibald
Member since Apr 2024
1979 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Utx is #3 behind #1 Oklahoma and #2 Nebraska
Nebraska is not located in the southwest
quote:

Utx has 4 MNC's, about6 the same as Georgia Tech and nobody calls the Bumbles a Blue Blood
Probably because Texas leads that school in a shite load more than just national titles? Food for thought
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
16900 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:11 am to
You can debate whether or not Nebraska is a blueblood, but from that population they are certainly the program furthest away from performing at a blue blood standard in current times.
This post was edited on 7/9/24 at 11:12 am
Posted by FluffyBunnyFeet
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2014
3632 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:14 am to
quote:

frick you and you wanna be Blue Bloods status you’re living off the past. Texas hasn’t done shite in almost 20 years except run their mouth, Lately Texas fricks up everything they touch …some blue blood lol

LOL! Swampy nouveau riche crybaby isn't getting the love he deserves!!
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:17 am to
quote:

What are the qualifications?


When you have a losing record in 5 seasons the past 15 years playing a dog shite schedule like tu, it’s a label to make you feel important and ease the pain.
Posted by FluffyBunnyFeet
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2014
3632 posts
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Utx is #3 behind #1 Oklahoma and #2 Nebraska

Nebraska. Who we beat 9 out of 10 times until they finally ran yelping to the B1G. Another brilliant contribution from Cheese Tits.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter