Started By
Message
re: Who from the SEC will join Oklahoma State in faliure to meet APR guidelines
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:13 pm to TigerNick23
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:13 pm to TigerNick23
quote:
2012 SEC APR Scores:
10Texas A&M -- 946
11.Auburn -- 943
quote:
Below is a rundown of the latest multi-year Academic Progress Rate scores for the 14 SEC football programs:
10T. Ole Miss 944
12. Kentucky 943
why did you bold these when they are all over the required APR number?
quote:
10T. LSU 944
ohhh.... now its more clear.
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 12:15 pm
1
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:14 pm to arrakis
Losing one full day of practice during game weeks is much more significant than it sounds. Usually coaches have players watch film on Sunday, light practices on Mon-Tues, and game preparation Wed-Fri. This could certainly alter how coaches plan for games if it carries over into the season, and not limited to fall practice.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:15 pm to ProjectP2294
I'm a man! I'm 4.0!
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:15 pm to arrakis
from story
It just doesn't say what score gets you in bowl ban area.
quote:
The Cowboys avoided a more damaging postseason ban.
It just doesn't say what score gets you in bowl ban area.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:16 pm to Dr RC
quote:
not really. money and exposure are probably far more important to schools in the long run
You think having 20% less prep time than their opponents won't affect their bowl eligibility?
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:17 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Maybe the rumors that so many were getting suspended are true and the NCAA panicked b/c they knew that would make it nearly impossible for the bowls to have enough teams.
That's actually an upside for me.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:17 pm to scrooster
Tennessee had better hope for nearly a perfect score this year otherwise, UT will be looking at some problems.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:20 pm to TigerNick23
Wow...print the shirts!
Mizzou athletics replaces Vandy at #1 ranking for APR in SEC!
M I Z
Z O U
Mizzou athletics replaces Vandy at #1 ranking for APR in SEC!
M I Z
Z O U
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:22 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
I'm sorry, can someone actually post an official link showing Kentucky is in trouble with the APR? Seems like the athletic program as a whole is doing wellLINK
Oh, can Dipshit Nick link how the Mizzou BB team is doing with the APR
Oh, can Dipshit Nick link how the Mizzou BB team is doing with the APR
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:26 pm to Bogie00
quote:
I would hope the missed practice is replaced by required study time, tutoring, etc.
It does, mandatory study hall replaces the practice time.
In basketball you first lose a scholarship for a year, then you lose practice time and have a post season ban.
If you lose practice time in football then turn in another below min score, you are looking at a bowl ban and further sanctions.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:27 pm to TigerNick23
Actually, here are the two figures that will be in the four-year calculation for each program:
AU - 943; 950
LSU - 964; 944
MSU - 959; 967
UAT - 970; 978
UAF - 936; 938
UF - 972; 968
UGA - 970; 968
UK - 951; 943
UM - 933; 944
USC - 966; 966
UT - 931; 924
VU - 978; 973
Based on those numbers, it doesn't look like any SEC schools are in danger of going below the 930 four year average. The database doesn't have 2012-13 or 2013-14, so I guess it's still possible though.
AU - 943; 950
LSU - 964; 944
MSU - 959; 967
UAT - 970; 978
UAF - 936; 938
UF - 972; 968
UGA - 970; 968
UK - 951; 943
UM - 933; 944
USC - 966; 966
UT - 931; 924
VU - 978; 973
Based on those numbers, it doesn't look like any SEC schools are in danger of going below the 930 four year average. The database doesn't have 2012-13 or 2013-14, so I guess it's still possible though.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:30 pm to WildcatMike
979 APR For Mizzou men's basketball
LINK
ETA Don't you look like a stupid frick
LINK
ETA Don't you look like a stupid frick
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:35 pm to TigerNick23
Yet, the one and dones did better then Mizzou.
You dolt, UK is not close in trouble with the APR.
You dolt, UK is not close in trouble with the APR.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:37 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
You think having 20% less prep time than their opponents won't affect their bowl eligibility?
To a degree, sure but not enough to stop them from making one. They are still pretty much a lock to win 6 games with their schedule and overall talent.
I still think the bowl exposure and (more importantly) money that comes from the bowl is more important long run.
FSU (Arlington)
Missouri State
UTSA
Texas Tech
Iowa State
@Kansas
@TCU
WVU
@KSU
Texas
@Baylor
@OU
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:37 pm to WildcatMike
quote:THAN
then
quote:followed by
dolt
quote:
is not close in trouble with
My favorite.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:38 pm to ProjectP2294
I'm sure Vandy will have a problem meeting those guidelines.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:43 pm to ColtonH
Yea. not my best work. On iPhone and squeezing work in between is not a good way to make a point on this site. Oh, 
for pointing it out 
for pointing it out 
Posted on 5/14/14 at 12:47 pm to Dr RC
My guess is Mizzou
We're accused of living in the past all the time. Well, almost all ranters are living in the recent past with regard to UT. We're going broke, we're flunking out, our stadium's falling down. Mike Hamilton and Derek Doolander are gone. My advice to everyone else is focus your attention on whoever's cheating for you - there's your problem, it ain't us.
We're accused of living in the past all the time. Well, almost all ranters are living in the recent past with regard to UT. We're going broke, we're flunking out, our stadium's falling down. Mike Hamilton and Derek Doolander are gone. My advice to everyone else is focus your attention on whoever's cheating for you - there's your problem, it ain't us.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 1:21 pm to TigerNick23
Tennessee is close. Not that a bowl ban means anything to them of course.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News