Started By
Message
re: where in these rankings is bama SOS rewarded?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:20 pm to Raoul_Duke
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:20 pm to Raoul_Duke
I can't even count. Oklahoma education
So we have 50% of the top 12 and people are bitching and moaning
So we have 50% of the top 12 and people are bitching and moaning
1
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:20 pm to JamalMurry27
quote:
JamalMurry27
Shutup
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:21 pm to JamalMurry27
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:23 pm to GeauxBurrow312
You’re so stupid. Ban this cat. He’s a Big 10 homer
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:25 pm to Raoul_Duke
quote:
AND 1 non-conference P4
We have to have those because it’s the only way to get any reasonable sense of comparable strength between the conferences.
Right now we have zero idea if Oregon or IU are any good. The eye test says yes, but outside of that we won’t know until at best the B1GCG.
Its rediculous.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:25 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
Bama's schedule doesnt look that much more impressive than the 3 teams ahead of them based on how they ranked teams
I have no problem with Alabama being ranked where they are. But they do have a decently more difficult schedule than the other 3 last I looked.
If it was a 0 loss team they'd be #1, instead it's the highest ranked 1 loss team.
Seems fine to me.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:26 pm to castorinho
I don’t believe margin of victory matters anymore. OU is one spot behind Texas, do you think you should be ahead?
And no I don’t think 2 road victories against below average to bad teams matters in the grand scheme as they are Ws.
And no I don’t think 2 road victories against below average to bad teams matters in the grand scheme as they are Ws.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:27 pm to tide06
Exactly, the BIG is laughing their arse off at the SEC.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:30 pm to castorinho
But they have to give auto to conferences and G5 which takes extra spots. An sec team could be 10 and the g5 and ACC champ gets automatically in, which is bs
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:38 pm to TexasWranglers
quote:
And no I don’t think 2 road victories against below average to bad teams matters in the grand scheme as they are Ws.
Agree with this. Just get the W. It’s the NFL model
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:52 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
You’re so stupid.
Gumps gonna get their arse whupped this weekend
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:53 pm to 3down10
quote:
I have no problem with Alabama being ranked where they are. But they do have a decently more difficult schedule than the other 3 last I looked.
If it was a 0 loss team they'd be #1, instead it's the highest ranked 1 loss team.
Seems fine to me.
Agreed. The loss to a 1-4 ACC team wipes out their best win (UGA), and they are left with 3 wins over currently ranked teams, 2 of which will not be ranked at the end of the year.
#4 is a fair ranking for the gumps, for now. Next weekend they drop to 10
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:54 pm to JamalMurry27
quote:
where in these rankings is bama SOS rewarded?
The part where there are the highest ranked 1 loss football team, despite being out gained and out first downed by South Carolina just a week or so ago.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 8:55 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News