Started By
Message

re: When does Ole Miss have to respond to NCAA?

Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:57 pm to
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:57 pm to
quote:


Actually they do. Penn State ring a bell?


They interjected themselves into a situation that was completely and totally outside their jurisdiction there too.

They've removed virtually every single sanction they put on Penn State. Restored the vacated wins and restored the scholarships and ended the post season ban way earlier than scheduled.

Both Penn State and Baylor are criminal and civil court matters that have no business being addressed by the NCAA.
Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:22 pm to
Did they give back the money?
Posted by Insideradvantage
Member since Oct 2014
6891 posts
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Is the general consensus 2 year post season ban and anywhere from 24-30 scholly reduction over 4-5 years?

You would be amazed at how many OM people think the self imposed 1 year bowl ban is all that will come from it.




Yeah, you are right, I would be amazed. I'm an OM fan and haven't spoken with another single OM fan who feels the least bit confident it will be just one year.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 12:52 am to
Never they are using POTUS example and pleading alternative facts
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47795 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 1:54 am to
State caused your program to cheat repeatedly?
State is some bad arse mofos then.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10384 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 5:46 am to
quote:

The NCAA wound up reversing all the sanctions against Penn State, apparently feeling they didn't have that authority. I still maintain PSU should have gotten the death penalty

One interesting thing that came out of the investigation at PSU:

About two years before this broke, the Board of Trustees sent two members to Paterno's house to tell him it was time to retire. And that they wanted to allow him to announce it himself as his idea.

He told them to get fricked. And that he would stay on until he croaked. And that he would go public and fight to keep coaching if they didn't back off. So, they backed off.

Now, you can't tell me that isn't Loss of Institutional Control. When the fricking football coach is telling the Board what to do, rather than the other way around.

My guess is that Alabama could face a similar situation. It's a dangerous dynamic.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42349 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 7:38 am to
That doesn't meet the NCAAs definition of a lack of institutional control.

That type of situation happens at every school all the time, the coach like Paterno or Bowden who built thief programs and was there for ever have leverage over the boards at their schools, rarely are they flat out fired, often steered towards retiring before they want.

Lack of institutional control happens when several programs are caught cheating under the authority of the same administration. No way has ole miss not met this definition by the NCAA.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter