Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:07 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Bama fans can not comprehend.
That is a relief... bama fans are in charge of the voting. This should be a lock then.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:07 pm to biglego
quote:
I hope the sport of college football suffers for this, I honestly do. Maybe that woudl force a change.
If you go back and check out the last 10 years, you'll find the BCS has been very good to LSU.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:07 pm to eman65
quote:
PurpleandGoldmotown you and most Alabama fans have no class.
You're right. Every team deserves a crystal ball like a participation trophy.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:08 pm to ApexTiger
quote:I don't think this game will draw the numbers the first one drew. Nearly every comment (from non-SEC) on every article I read after the first game was about how boring the game was or how they flipped channels around 2nd, 3rd quarter. Much of the rest of the country doesn't appreciate great defense.
he fans across the country spoke loud and clear today. 81%!
they don't want a rematch for many reasons Bama fans can not comprehend.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:08 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
What kind of backlash is going to happen Monday and forward if Bama
gets in?
Backlash against who? Even if every SEC fan wanted this to happen, the rest of the country could have voted differently. People need to take it up with the voters if they have a problem. I could see both sides...
If it's the two best teams, then Bama should be in. If you want a conference champ and no rematches, then it's OSU. Either way, LSU always plays their best ball in January.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:09 pm to Clockwatcher68
BCS backlash = 
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:09 pm to razthecat
razthecat[quote]So what now, are you going to start the 81% movement? Occupy BCSNCG?
We already have residency, your the one with your nose sticking threw the fence begging for a hand out.
We already have residency, your the one with your nose sticking threw the fence begging for a hand out.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:09 pm to ApexTiger
1) couldnt care less about "backlash". It will be toward system not Bama (though wldnt care if directed at Bama).
2) bcs isnt a fan vote system. It is a system that no LSU fans bitched about in '03 or '07, so why are you so worries about it noe?
2) bcs isnt a fan vote system. It is a system that no LSU fans bitched about in '03 or '07, so why are you so worries about it noe?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:10 pm to NewGuy01
quote:
If you go back and check out the last 10 years, you'll find the BCS has been very good to LSU.
Very true, especially when you consider what happened to Auburn in 2004.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:10 pm to ApexTiger
If the BCS stays (ie: no playoff), it sorely needs a "+1" format, IMO.
Pair up #1 vs #4, #2 vs #3 in the bowl games... the winners of those two games go to the BCSNC game.
No one, or not many, would argue that their #5 ranked team should have a shot at the NC.
Pair up #1 vs #4, #2 vs #3 in the bowl games... the winners of those two games go to the BCSNC game.
No one, or not many, would argue that their #5 ranked team should have a shot at the NC.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:10 pm to ApexTiger
I suspect they will cancel the game.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:10 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
2) bcs isnt a fan vote system. It is a system that no LSU fans bitched about in '03 or '07, so why are you so worries about it noe?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:10 pm to TigerTattle
quote:
I don't think this game will draw the numbers the first one drew. Nearly every comment (from non-SEC) on every article I read after the first game was about how boring the game was or how they flipped channels around 2nd, 3rd quarter. Much of the rest of the country doesn't appreciate great defense.
looks like we need to amend the bcs... the fans enjoyment of defensive games definitely needs to be factored in. Screw the two best teams, we need to figure out what they "want" to watch.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:11 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
You're referring to eight hundreths of 1% of the US's population?
Whatever the percentage is, I bet it's die hard CFB fans that took time to vote
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:11 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Accurately kept a team who lost to a 6 and 6 Iowa State from being a give-me win to LSU
Sadly that is not the issue. Okie State proved they can put points on the board against a good team. You really believe Bama can win if we play again? You are delusional. It won't happen. No one wants to see Bama get beat again. If that's what it is gonna be #1 vs #2*, then so be it. You will lose twice in the same year to a much better team.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:13 pm to NewGuy01
quote:
If you go back and check out the last 10 years, you'll find the BCS has been very good to LSU.
Yes, they have respected the SEC champ almost every year
Just never seen a none SEC champ team get in the National title game
really strange to me
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:13 pm to biglego
quote:
I hope the sport of college football suffers for this, I honestly do. Maybe that woudl force a change. Maybe if we dont get a playoff, we'll at least get special rules in place for Bama, since the normal rules dont currently apply to them.
wait. please tell me what special rules apply to alabama? there are several components that make up the bcs formula. which rule has alabama, as a team, broken?
looking forward to your special interpretation of the alabama special rules.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:13 pm to Lynyrd
quote:
You really believe Bama can win if we play again? You are delusional
agreed, lsu definitely outmatched bama in the first one... wasn't even really close.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:13 pm to breeze
quote:
breeze
quote:
looks like we need to amend the bcs
First rule: if you lose to a team who doesnt have a winning record you dont get in over a team who lost to the #1 team in overtime.
Second rule: If your team trys to campaign to play that weak arse team who just lost to a 6 and 6 team then you are ineligible for being a bunch of pussies.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News