Started By
Message
re: Welcome to the SEC, Nobodies
Posted on 8/9/12 at 9:29 am to OldSulRoss
Posted on 8/9/12 at 9:29 am to OldSulRoss
I agree. We most definitely suck. Its embarrassing that the SEC let us in. I'd be fricking pissed if I was a longtime SEC fan.
0
Posted on 8/9/12 at 9:31 am to OldSulRoss
quote:
Ha! The Johnny Drama description is apt, especially considering that UT-Vince had one blockbuster movie and then squandered his talent at the hands of a talentless director and a debilitating coke habit. Does that make the LHN Medellin?
So Vince Young IS Queens Boulevard? 
Posted on 8/9/12 at 9:32 am to Sherwood Brotron
quote:
A&M has won the last 5 out of 6 against LSU
yea, twenty yrs ago. your best era; our worse era. even tho i tend to agree with your premise, your stats used to prove it are bogus, misleading and frankly, dishonest. are you a politician?
Posted on 8/9/12 at 10:39 am to GeauxBigOrGoHome
quote:
Welcome to the SEC, Nobodies
Yet another tired piece going on and on about how A&M and Missouri will get kicked around by the SEC.
I would really like to know one thing. How successful would one of these teams have to be to demonstrate that all the "you gonna get raped" hype was wrong? Surely, they don't have to win the SEC Championship in year one to prove they can compete, do they? If not, then what DO they have to do?
My prediction is that both teams will win about half their SEC games and finish around the middle of their divisions, although Missouri's easier road in the East may well lead to a better result than that for them. Would those results convince people that they are legitimate in the SEC?
Posted on 8/9/12 at 11:05 am to Nuts4LSU
+
Makes the SEC,
This post was edited on 8/9/12 at 11:06 am
Posted on 8/9/12 at 11:36 am to GeauxBigOrGoHome
quote:
mediocrity
quote:
the states of Tennessee and Mississippi
quote:
average
I'll take average and mediocre when I can get it!
Posted on 8/9/12 at 12:36 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
I would really like to know one thing. How successful would one of these teams have to be to demonstrate that all the "you gonna get raped" hype was wrong? Surely, they don't have to win the SEC Championship in year one to prove they can compete, do they? If not, then what DO they have to do?
My prediction is that both teams will win about half their SEC games and finish around the middle of their divisions, although Missouri's easier road in the East may well lead to a better result than that for them. Would those results convince people that they are legitimate in the SEC?
Just gotta laugh, shrug, and move on
Even if A&M or Mizzou were to win the conference in year 1, most people would just assume the SEC had an uncharacteristic down year or something. It is what it is--the newest members getting a little (mostly) good natured hazing. And that's ok in my book
Posted on 8/9/12 at 12:56 pm to TXARTiger
quote:
Don't Tell us what you did yesterday, tell us what you did today.
My point was that football is cyclical. Cocky LSU fans just assume they will stay on top forver and A&M will continue to suck. Even Bama (LSU's daddy) has had some pretty f-ing bad years in the last decade.
Two bad coaching hires in a row can really f your program up.
Posted on 8/9/12 at 4:41 pm to bpfergu
quote:
Lots of butthurt Aggies and Mizzous up in this thread.
I don't know about the Aggies, but for most Mizzou fans, the only butthurt we experience is passing some of that tough wildhog out our arse.
Pork is whats for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Posted on 8/9/12 at 4:49 pm to GeauxBigOrGoHome
quote:
Welcome to the SEC, Nobodies
Wow, Never heard any of that before. Is there an echo in here or is it just me?
Pfffffttt, what a joke.
Pease tell me this guy doesn't get paid for this. 
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News