Started By
Message

re: WCWS Final | Thursday - Texas Tech 4 Texas 3

Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
2858 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
13591 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:07 pm to
Agree
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
18347 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:10 pm to
Great play/AB by the Texas catcher.

Ole Miss hit a walk-off HR against Auburn in a similar situation. Wasn’t the National Championship, though.
Big time play
Posted by CaliHorn
Los Angeles
Member since Apr 2025
658 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:13 pm to
If you’re going to float one right over the plate…

They won’t make that mistake again.
Posted by BigBro
Member since Jul 2021
19540 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:24 pm to
The play at second base..

I understand those that I’ve said that they followed the rulebook, and that’s fine, I’m not going to argue that side either way. It’s a stupid rule, but if it’s a rule, so be it.

My question is..

What is the shortstop supposed to do in that situation? She had to move to catch the ball and because of that the runner slid into her.

The runner was tagged out before her legs even had the opportunity to be blocked.

Are you only allowed to stand behind the bag and put the glove on the other side of the base? I legit don’t understand.

Should the shortstop do a front flip after she catches the ball and tag her as she is flipping over the player or would that also be obstruction?
This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 10:25 pm
Posted by n64ra
Member since Jul 2024
2024 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:24 pm to
I've never seen a team lose the lead on an intentional walk before!
Posted by TX Tea
Member since Sep 2023
586 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

They could have if they ignored the rule.

The slide was initiated before the ball was in glove. There was no "out by a mile" option.

As I've said, I didn't like the call but it, by rule, was correct.


Obstruction is just what it means. But when you tag somebody out way before they even get close to the base that's not obstruction. They got way too technical looking at the fine print instead of seeing the actual play and why the obstruction rule should not have applied for this play.

Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
18347 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

The runner was tagged out before her legs even had the opportunity to be blocked.


So, the play would have been legal with a poorer throw.
I know that’s not the rule, but that’s how it played out
Posted by umop sujoH
Member since Jul 2021
415 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 3:05 am to
The obstruction rule, as written, is idiotic and needs to be changed again. Teams get screwed with it all the time.

When it happens to your team, you're furious. When it happens to your opponent, you think, "Well, that's still fricking stupid...but it's just payback for when it happened to us two weeks ago."

I hate it, as I assume most everyone does, but when the umps/review monkeys call it by the letter as they're supposed to, this is what you get. The Tech coach would have been negligent to not ask for a review.

They also need to use the double bag at first to avoid that whole other can of interference horseshite...and for safety of course.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10238 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 6:16 am to
quote:

She obstructed the base path between first and second. It’s a straight line. I realize that might offend you during pride month. I do not care.


It's pretty obvious this Tech coach will take any cheap challenge or tactic he can muster. And it will cost him the NC. Just pissed off Goliath.

And keep your calendar to yourself. Go be proud, or whatever yall do.
Posted by Wishbone85
Member since Nov 2024
1728 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 6:24 am to
The obstruction rule is the targeting of college softball.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10238 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 7:07 am to
quote:

The obstruction rule is the targeting of college softball.


I don't follow softball religiously but that sounds like a default go-to challenge whenever something doesn't work out on the baseline. Odds are very good that a defender had a foot somewhere in order to make the play.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
1979 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 8:39 am to
I place much of the blame for the Atwood single on the catcher. Looking at her stand right behind home plate and open her glove as a target right behind the plate is bad. She should be holding her right hand extended out as a target for Canadey and then stepping over to catch the ball well outside the strike zone. Go look.
Posted by N0T SURE
Member since Dec 2023
1739 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 8:53 am to
I saw the same thing....wondered why she didn't just set up extremely outside...and if the ump is worried he could just get way outside behind her....by far the best most ballsy play I've seen in a situation like that, then to drive in 2 on top of that.
Posted by N0T SURE
Member since Dec 2023
1739 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 8:55 am to
My last few posts have double posted....apologies
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 8:56 am
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
20301 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

The obstruction rule is the targeting of college softball.


I don't know how they even overturned that call. As much as I dislike Chelsea Clark, she was in position to see where Goode's foot was and never stuck her arm up. Just a horrible call on the review teams part.

I will say if Chelsea Clark is behind the plate tonight get ready for some bad calls. She has no business calling balls and strikes. I watched Arkansas catcher question her on a obvious strike she called a ball and Clark went full karen mode and looked like a first class winch.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10238 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:18 am to
quote:

She should be holding her right hand extended out as a target for Canadey and then stepping over to catch the ball


I think she tried that on the first one but Miss Million wouldn't throw it out there. Why I have no idea. So for the next ones the catcher just stood up and caught the ball. You can't step over to catch a ball that ain't there.

It's like wonder pitcher had no idea how to walk a batter, or how it works.
Posted by mortgageman82
Austin. TX
Member since Jul 2021
339 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:18 am to
Is Glasgo as goofy and clueless as he sounded in that post game presser or was that really just the shock of the moment all over them facing the questions from the media?

His demeanor and answers throughout that entire presser were just bizarre. It felt like some new coach, not a seasoned one. It’s a tough coaching moment but I don’t think he did anything there to instill confidence for his team going forward.
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10238 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Is Glasgo as goofy and clueless as he sounded


Thank you. I'm tired of people pumping this guy. He should be driving a clown car. And he also appears to seek the cheap way out - he was challenging every stupid little thing. He'll take a backdoor win with no ounce of shame.

Texas Tech is a pedestrian team with a bought pitcher and the 3rd Stooge as Head coach. The fact that one player can carry them this far makes the sport a joke.
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
20301 posts
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:

It's like wonder pitcher had no idea how to walk a batter, or how it works.


They said on the broadcast it was her first intentional walk of the year. Maybe she got pissed that Glasgo wouldnt let her pitch ti Atwood.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 11:29 am
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter