Waiting for the New Rule: 1 Team Per Conference in playoffs

quote:

---

it really only makes sense to expand to at least include all conference champions

then there is no bitching

---

Until a 7-5 conference champion gets in over a 12-1 non champion

quote:

---

Until a 7-5 conference champion gets in over a 12-1 non champion

---

then you make the 12-1 non champion the at large pick

quote:

---

win your conference and you are in

---

Problem is that not all P5 conferences are created equal. Alabama, UGA and Auburn would have gone undefeated in the PAC12, for example. As "weak" as people claim the SEC is this year, more than a couple of them would have destroyed some of the other conferences.

at beginning of committee existence they brought the media in to do a mock of 2011 season and that mock put bama at number 4 in 2011. so the media was fully aware this was going to happen and I don't remember them saying anything bad about it during that introductory reveal of the playoff committee when it started.

quote:

---

Problem is that not all P5 conferences are created equal. Alabama, UGA and Auburn would have gone undefeated in the PAC12, for example. As "weak" as people claim the SEC is this year, more than a couple of them would have destroyed some of the other conferences.

---

then get rid of the conference championship games, or don't take them into account altogether

quote:

---

then get rid of the conference championship games, or don't take them into account altogether

---

Bitch Bitch Bitch bitch




Lol
Bitches

We will see 8 teams. You want to know why? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

They could just stick to the criteria.

Let's start there and see where the current system goes.

I think it's a mistake to rely so heavily on the conferences ...