Started By
Message

re: WAC commisioner calls out SEC officials

Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:52 am to
Posted by Dobermann
Member since Sep 2008
2032 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:52 am to
quote:

“It’s nice to see the review process works.”


I can't believe Les said this
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19742 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:53 am to
Confident that Jarret Lee would drive us down the field? No. But we'll never know.
Posted by jesterJ
Near the Northern Lights
Member since Nov 2009
892 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Jarrett Lee still has to drive 65 yards for a TD. Are you confident he would do that, considering what he had looked liked in the game already. Not to mention, no Charles Scott.


heck, if it would have come down to that, I would have had less faith in our H.C. and his O. staff to make the right calls than the kid.
besides that is all over regardless ,so let sleeping dogs die and stop pounding your chest until you put the Crystal Ball away on a level playing field in front of the Whole World. And with officials from a conference that will not represent neither of the teams conference playing in the BCS game.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72275 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:54 am to
Posted by TexTgrTed
Parker County, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
5830 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

WAC commisioner calls out SEC officials


Sounds about right, since the SEC office is for the most part an apologist organization for the SEC refs.
Posted by LooongTimeATiger
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2008
151 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:25 pm to
Whether or not anyone thinks that Lsu could have or should have beaten alabama is not the point. The point is that Lsu was deprived of an opportunity to try to score, an opportunity that they clearly earned on the field of play but was denied them by an inept, or possibly biased official that could not see what millions of others saw. And add that to at least 4 other calls/no calls in alabamas favor, and any fair minded person has to admit that the officiating could have influenced the outcome of that game.
Posted by BigDogGambler
The Ship
Member since Oct 2009
997 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Maybe LSU should join the WAC.


Maybe Bama should join the WAC so you can win a conference championship. When was the last, 1992?
Posted by DB2
Member since Jan 2008
1126 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:23 pm to
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Whether or not anyone thinks that Lsu could have or should have beaten alabama is not the point. The point is that Lsu was deprived of an opportunity to try to score, an opportunity that they clearly earned on the field of play but was denied them by an inept, or possibly biased official that could not see what millions of others saw. And add that to at least 4 other calls/no calls in alabamas favor, and any fair minded person has to admit that the officiating could have influenced the outcome of that game.

Bama-LSU. Baton Rouge. 2004. Non-call in LSU's favor. We were deprived of the chance to go up two scores.

I'd say it evened out.

Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52849 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:56 pm to
people on the tiger rant were throwing a fit over that "no call" but it looked like a clean hit to me. He leads with his arms, and then there facemasks hit. How is that illegal?
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 5:57 pm
Posted by Bradford
Member since Jun 2008
184 posts
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:57 pm to
Helmet to helmet?
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter